Core gamers clearly prefer traditional boxes(whether PC or console) with 3rd party support. That isn't limited to Neogaf. This thing doesn't even seem appealing to casuals so it must be made for the people who bought the 3DS.
Why do people keep talking like Nvidia it's the X1 or X2? It's more than likely a custom chip based on one or the other. Nintendo usually has a heavy hand in their own chip design.
Who is 'most people'? Most people don't care about Nintendo, or don't care about them enough to trade Nintendo over what they already have in PS4, XB1 or PC, which are a majority of the market. So why should Nintendo care about running after what everyone else does?
This is supposedly the only NX unit. There is no 'console version' according to Eurogamer's first leak
I don't know what's worse, the comment or that the comment was upvoted 25 times
So does this line up with the rumors that the CPU is more powerful than PS4? Just curious as that rumor was widely believed to be true on Gaf.
It's clear on GAF. GAF isn't anywhere near the general consumer base.
I think there are a lot of people who still don't understand this is the handheld
Handheld at about Wii U level is about what we expected just from historical precedence.
Core gamers clearly prefer traditional boxes(whether PC or console) with 3rd party support. That isn't limited to Neogaf. This thing doesn't even seem appealing to casuals so it must be made for the people who bought the 3DS.
True enough. The general consumer base is even less likely to buy a dedicated handheld gaming device, judging by trends.
Is this a dedicated handheld gaming device?
I'd say just take this out of your post TBH. That's extremely disrespectful and we don't need to put it on display for others to read.
I can see them getting a decent deal on Tegra X2. Nintendo will sell FAR more NX devices than Nvidia would sell Shield devices. Having it billed as "the most powerful handheld device ever" would be a nice thing to say.
So it would be a win win for both of them.
And I am convinced its an X2 in there. Why else put a overclocked Tegra X1 in their with a loud fan?
Would this be as expensive as the Nvidia Shield or is there some fundamental differences?
And mine too, unless he knows something I don't see the point of criticizing DF for reporting what their sources told them.
They clarified that the X2 comment was 100% speculation on their part.
Good question, the info on the CPU is basically the most solid info we had prior to this info. Would the CPU in a overclocked Tegra X1 (which seems to be the dev kit) be more powerful than PS4's CPU? Yeah probably would, Jaguar's quite a poor CPU.
Yes. It very much is.
Right. and it's a handheld. I don't understand how people are expecting ps4 graphics and getting disappointed.
That and the potential for less heat and a better battery. X2 just makes more sense.
True enough. The general consumer base is even less likely to buy a dedicated handheld gaming device, judging by trends.
The reason for their speculation, however, really only leaves a 16nm option or X2. You're not shipping a consumer component with overclocked, active cooled parts in a handheld.
Just an FYI that google uses the X1 in their flagship tablet. Look at the resolution of that screen(2650x1800), then look at all the reviews where they praise the performance.
https://store.google.com/product/pixel_c
http://www.cnet.com/products/google-pixel-c/
This gives me great hope for the NX.
I think they leave it as speculation because only had one source for the active cooled part.
I actually prefer Youtube comments over anything else. I know it can be very toxic, but at least there is no one there telling you what you can and can't say. There aren't any mods or admins playing favorites to companies and certain users.
I actually prefer Youtube comments over anything else. I know it can be very toxic, but at least there is no one there telling you what you can and can't say. There aren't any mods or admins playing favorites to companies and certain users.
Exactly, and they care about power consumption and efficiency. Going with the 16nm option lines up better in their hardware philosophy.Yeah but we are talking about Nintendo here.
My question is, i don't understand why people hype themselves up only to be disappointed later.
At this point, its not even Nintendo making bad decisions, but a player base who can't accept that Nintendo's focus has not aligned with theirs for a while.
Active cooling is hard to miss. This isn't some small component of a machine.
X1: 20nm process Maxwell architecture
X2: 16nm process Pascal architecture
Even if it's a custom chip it will be based in one of these 2 configurations.
Who is 'most people'? Most people don't care about Nintendo, or don't care about them enough to trade Nintendo over what they already have in PS4, XB1 or PC, which are a majority of the market.
I did some research about the Pascal Tegra called "Parker" and looks like the GPU side will be a Pascal core with 512SPs.
512SPs @ 1300Mhz = 1.33 TFs
512SPs @ 1500Mhz = 1.54 TFs
Making a comparison with actual consoles these specs are better than Xbone and possible PS4 (at least on pair with PS4).
It is not that bad like some guys are saying.
I did some research about the Pascal Tegra called "Parker" and looks like the GPU side will be a Pascal core with 512SPs.
512SPs @ 1300Mhz = 1.33 TFs
512SPs @ 1500Mhz = 1.54 TFs
Making a comparison with actual consoles these specs are better than Xbone and possible PS4 (at least on pair with PS4).
It is not that bad like some guys are saying.
Still hoping that curved screen with the tapable buttons is there. Ok so we know clickable scroll wheels are there too so this sounds interesting. The local cloud compute is also possible. Regardless its got a good chip, I wonder if they'll ditch the 3D screen.
You were the one who broke the Wii U bad news on here, right?
I did some research about the Pascal Tegra called "Parker" and looks like the GPU side will be a Pascal core with 512SPs.
512SPs @ 1300Mhz = 1.33 TFs
512SPs @ 1500Mhz = 1.54 TFs
Making a comparison with actual consoles these specs are better than Xbone and possible PS4 (at least on pair with PS4).
It is not that bad like some guys are saying.
Nintendo will go 3rd party in 2018-2019 confirmed basically.
I perma ban bet that Nintendo will NOT go third party within 20 years.
Them's fightin words. You don't like a specific community, you don't have to actively engage in it. If you wanna be a troll, there are plenty of other places to do it.
Mobile Tegra Maxwell runs at 1000Mhz already... Pascal will run higher.Mobile NX aint going run at those clocks.
Mobile NX aint going run at those clocks.
No offense, but GAF has been wrong about a LOT of things before. The general consensus was that the Wii would tank and that the Vita would ascend to the heavens as the greatest video game device ever.
Neither was even close.
"That isn't limited to NeoGAF" doesn't say anything.
So you want another GameCube. Because third party support is not something Nintendo can just plan to add to their new console. They always want third parties onboard. And I really don't think this stuff you're talking about is as objective data as you think