Just trying to be clear here, when you say varied 4K offerings, you are saying different types of rendering techniques like checkboarding etc?
They didn't have to promise 4K for every game in order have embarrassing marketing John. Don't defend that.
Had we had less of buzzwords and more down to earth ads, people would not be reacting like this(of course with the Pro's fauxK mocking, maybe not)
MS has no control what devs do with the power of the X. Do you seriously want Phil to watch over every single game. You are being silly.
Indeed. This is just silly. The implementation is fantastic and genuinely looks native in most situations. The hate in regards to this type of rendering baffles me. It's a good way to get solid results with a reduced performance cost. MS never promised native 4K for every game - it's up to devs.
Wait till you show everyone how much better Xbox One X looks over the pro
NBA 2k17 went from 1080p on PS4 to native (not checkerboard) 4k on PS4Pro.. You may want to edit that post.
Of course he has no control over it, just the choice of wording against the other team, in hindsight, doesn't make sense when its happening on their box as well.
Talk is gonna talk, that is never gonna change, whether you got Phil taking a dump and using True 4K terms, to Jim 4 da kids & BC sucks talk. I'm just saying that Phil's choice of wording/marketing is, just based off this 1 game alone, unfortunate that is all.
Which 900p ps4 game reached 2160c on Pro?
I'm pretty sure my argument is that there is no such thing as true X resolution console designation for any console ever, tried to use Xbox One and PS4 with 1080p games as an example but you kept insisting on going with this "true 4K" nonsense. In fact i said this to you in that thread.Your reason was that the PS4 Pro was also a "true 4K" console, so don't give me that shit.
So big budget games aren't always more often than not a lot prettier than their lower budget, more indie title counterparts? Are you saying AAA titles don't exist now?
Yeah, I'd agree that the X1 isn't a true 1080p console. If anything you've just solidified my point haha.
No, big budget games aren't always the prettiest. There are lots more beautiful low budget games than big budget games because of art style. No i do not agree that Xbox One is not a 1080p console just because you make up an arbitrary narrow criteria to fit some narrative of what a true 4K console is. There has never been a true X resolution console designation for any console ever. There have however been certain common capabilities that defined a given generation like 8bit, 16bit, 32bit/3D polygon era etc. Last gen was considered HD and majority of console games were 720p or less.
You are however free to call whatever console you like true 1080p or 4K console if that makes you happy.
Why are you posting false statements?
Some 1080P PS4 games are native 4K on PS4 Pro
Huh? Again, Phil can only control his own games, not every devs games. Again, hes said many times it's up to them. Every game is different so what are you so angry about?
Of course he has no control over it, just the choice of wording against the other team, in hindsight, doesn't make sense when its happening on their box as well.
Talk is gonna talk, that is never gonna change, whether you got Phil taking a dump and using True 4K terms, to Jim 4 da kids & BC sucks talk. I'm just saying that Phil's choice of wording/marketing is, just based off this 1 game alone, unfortunate that is all.
it is the truer 4k system
So you are saying Phil is lying when he says it's up to the devs how to use the power? I mean have you watched the video? Game looks and plays amazing and it's in Alpha. Enjoy.
Yup.For the people who are disappointed/shocked by this, well, prepare yourself, as there will be more games in the future that will not be native 4k and will use checkerboard instead. I think the question that needs to be asked here is would you rather have native 4k in Assassin's but lower visual fidelity or increased visual fidelity but that uses checkerboard to get almost native 4k quality. I think I would pick the latter, if visual fidelity is what matters most to you.
I'm angry at the marketing of the XBX, phils annoying statements like "Pro is aiming for Xbox One S", and the buzzwords they are using to try and artificially create hype.
My irritation doesn't have anything to do with what the XBX actually puts out.
Lmao, give me a fucking break. The goalposts for this system have been moved so much they are now in another stadium.You know what I find quite funny on here is most people who actually intend to buy this console are saying, this is fine, we knew this all along. I know I and others said that we'd prefer 4K checkerboard for higher settings.
Then you get the people who clearly have no intention of buying this are like LOLOLOL TRUE 4Kinda.
Everyone knew since this thing was announced that it was only 1st party games which would be running at 4K.
Its also a bloody alpha build.
What the poster is trying to say is that Phil is bullshitting when Phil claimed XboneX did not use similair techniques as Pro to reach 4K and thereby where not competing.
When in actuallity they very muchly use the same ways.
The checkerboarding is no problem in itself, it is a great solution on all fronts.
.Lmao, give me a fucking break. The goalposts for this system have been moved so much they are now in another stadium.
What the poster is trying to say is that Phil is bullshitting when Phil claimed XboneX did not use similair techniques as Pro to reach 4K and thereby where not competing.
When in actuallity they very muchly use the same ways.
The checkerboarding is no problem in itself, it is a great solution on all fronts.
I feel like this is bait lol but yes, they've stated that the type of rendering will include checkboard, dynamic and native depending on the developer. Only their internal titles will absolutely be native.
You know what? I need a witness or better yet The Witness!
it went from 900P on PS4 to having a native 4K option on PS4 Pro
What happened to 4K 60FPS no compromises
Try another planet. It's been a fun ride though haha.Lmao, give me a fucking break. The goalposts for this system have been moved so much they are now in another stadium.
Mostly HD remasters from last gen and smaller indie titles
Lmao, give me a fucking break. The goalposts for this system have been moved so much they are now in another stadium.
You can state that until you are blue in the face. Hundreds of more posts will still question it.Again, Phil also said it's up to the devs of how to use the X's power. Funny how everyone bypasses that. Phil can't control what the Dev sees what's best for their games. If anything we should be happy it's up to the devs.
Artificially create hype? How do you live a daily life? What company doesn't want to create hype. I'm not understanding. Chill out and watch the video. It's beautiful.
Mostly HD remasters from last gen and smaller indie titles
Not a single game on Pro made a jump this big in resolution from the base console.
So you are saying Phil is lying when he says it's up to the devs how to use the power? I mean have you watched the video? Game looks and plays amazing and it's in Alpha. Enjoy.
The person I was replying to said
Yup.
Checkerboard with bells & whistles, all day! Especially for these mid-gen consoles.
The payoff in taking the time to implement proper checkerboard rendering is a lot bigger imo than chasing that native res for these machines.
If they are being misleading and cringy with their buzzwords, of course i'm going to be irritated when they keep on doing it.
That's pretty much it.
YupGame will look beautiful running on my x.
I expected checkerboard but it really makes Phil's whole "true 4k" speech look bad.
For the record, I think checkerboard 4k looks great on my PS4 pro but Microsoft needs to clear their damn messaging up. It seems like every year, shortly after their conference we find out that they just straight up lied about one thing or another.
Nice that the first DF XBX analysis features a game that doesn't have the Full Best Pixels Native 4K Not Bad Like What The PS4 Pro Does presentation.
You are being ridiculous. This thread ties into the other thread because they are about "true 4K" and what Phil Spencer said. There has been no disupute that Xbox OX is more powerful than PS4 Pro, there has also been no dispute that Xbox OX would have better effects and high settings than PS4 Pro because 4TF < 6TF. This conversation has been about Xbox marketing team's insistent on marketing Xbox OX as the first true 4K system. With Phil going as far as saying PS4 Pro is a competitor to Xbox One S. This argument has never been about Xbox OX running games at higher settings.What an argument on another thread has to do with what's being discussed on this thread? This thread is about people telling what people say it's a lie.
Which 900p ps4 game reached 2160c on Pro?
Again, Phil also said it's up to the devs of how to use the X's power. Funny how everyone bypasses that. Phil can't control what the Dev sees what's best for their games. If anything we should be happy it's up to the devs.
I feel like this is bait lol but yes, they've stated that the type of rendering will include checkboard, dynamic and native depending on the developer. Only their internal titles will absolutely be native.
Okay, save yourself the energy and don't buy the X. Problem solved.
And I charge 50 an hour for counseling.
True 4k.
lol