We have actual facts here we don't need no claim of insiders or no more articles.
Pie and Beans - is there anything controversial about that? Edit: maybe I didn't read the entire Edge article, as I'm at work and only skimmed... but what would be the lie here? Sony's titles will be extremely consumer-friendly, and they're on side with gamers in that regard.
Sony has learned a lot since the PS3 unveil. The PS4 is proof paid to that. Stop this shitty thought process.Lets remember something here.. Sony isn't known for being very truthful in their claims during E3s... (PS3 Killzone ring a bell)
Yes, it'll be up to me. Buy or don't. I'm cool with this.a quick simple solution to this is not support the publishers implementing DRM, as long as Sony themselves is not implementing it at the system level then it shouldn't be much of a problem.
Publishers are free to make their DRM as they want it. Is that such a controversial claim? They did the same thing this generation, but many of them will be employing less consumer-friendly DRM this upcoming round to protect their IPs further. If they want to make their game operate with network-play-only, they are free to. Hell, they can do that now. But is there something controversial about more publishers considering such tactics? It's employed on the OS level of MS' console, certainly, by Microsoft. Here the onus would be on pubs.
Don't insult me. Use yours. All Edge is saying here is that at the end of the day when you purchase a typical third party game that it will be the same or similar on either console. It's not really as sensationalistic as many claim.
Has this been posted?
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/PS...s-Even-From-Third-Party-Publishers-56656.html
No 3rd party online passes are allowed either apparently.
I think they are still allowed but he said devs most likely wont use them.Yet nobody will take this into account and debate about things that do not exist will continue.
This deserves its own thread because it uses official source with extremely strong notion about something that is very important for the perception and outlook of one of the platforms.
Has this been posted?
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/PS...s-Even-From-Third-Party-Publishers-56656.html
No 3rd party online passes are allowed either apparently.
Yet nobody will take this into account and debate about things that do not exist will continue.
This deserves its own thread because it uses official source with extremely strong notion about something that is very important for the perception and outlook of one of the platforms.
The way I read it is that Edge is claiming that publishers will employ the same policies across both consoles.So I see you're still not using your brain. Any DRM "solution" that publisher comes up with on ps4 can also be used on ps3, 360, and wiiu. This piece is sensationalist garbage. It is FUD. The type of DRM MS is employing is physically incompatible with how the ps4 or any other console operates.
So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
The way I read it is that Edge is claiming that publishers will employ the same policies across both consoles.
With Xbox One they don't have to do anything, they just have to submit to Microsoft how their title should be handled.
With PlayStation 4 they have to implement their online authentication themselves.
So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
Ok I am done now.So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
Yes, which is why they call it a PR play.That hypothesis runs counterpoint to every word that has come out of Sony on the subject.
The way I read it is that Edge is claiming that publishers will employ the same policies across both consoles.
With Xbox One they don't have to do anything, they just have to submit to Microsoft how their title should be handled.
With PlayStation 4 they have to implement their online authentication themselves, make everything be behind an online-pass and make the online-pass cost the full price of the game, made a deal with GameStop to give players a new online-pass for the used copy if you trade it in. Then you have effectively disallowed used game sales for private owners like on Xbox One.
They wrote something just as nonsensical, that's my point.
DRM outside of online passes is physically incompatible with how the ps4 works as described by Sony.
how is this argument still happening
things remain as they are
no online check in restricted console period.
want to be online play online you could possibly need a code. to do things you'd be online for anyways.
So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
Yes, which is why they call it a PR play.
In the part you quoted me it says"Required login" =/= used games DRM
Yeah. It's completely insane if true. If they were planning of doing the exact same thing as Microsoft anyway, then the path they are currently on is completely the wrong way to go about this. They could have used the negative press of Microsoft and said "we have the same, because we must, but at least our hardware is more powerful and we're cheaper." not portraying themselves as the consumer-friends.There's a difference between a PR play and saying the absolute opposite of what you're actually doing.
So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
...Never questioned?So before the consoles were revealed Edge's rumors were never to be questioned, but now that they say something negative they are clearly wrong?
So you want more claims and more articles? ....and no we don't have actual facts, just what Sony is currently saying.
If you forget about key coded DLC unlocked parts of modes of games
Ok I am done now.
Yes, which is why they call it a PR play.
So before the consoles were revealed Edge's rumors were never to be questioned, but now that they say something negative they are clearly wrong?
So before the consoles were revealed Edge's rumors were never to be questioned, but now that they say something negative they are clearly wrong?
So before the consoles were revealed Edge's rumors were never to be questioned, but now that they say something negative they are clearly wrong?
...Never questioned?
In the part you quoted me it says
"With PlayStation 4 they have to implement their online authentication themselves, make everything be behind an online-pass and make the online-pass cost the full price of the game, made a deal with GameStop to give players a new online-pass for the used copy if you trade it in. Then you have effectively disallowed used game sales for private owners like on Xbox One."
Maybe they are talking about digital items since it sounds like those will be locked down with DRM? We can only go by what Sony is telling us so far and leave it at that. I'd be really surprised if they went back on those policies after the reaction they received.
Of course, but there was still a good amount that also said they probably don't have good MS sources compared to Sony, that they got info from Superdae, that they just misheard 'always online' and had no idea what they were talking about. It wasn't unanimous acceptance at all.IIRC, anytime anyone doubted Edge rumors, people claimed they would never put their rep on the line by putting out something false and had a clean track record of rumors.
It is the same. What publishers decide on is different is what's being claimed.Nintendo saying that Wii U supports used games is a PR play
Microsoft saying 360 supports used games is a PR play
Sony saying PS3 supports used games is a PR play
Argue against any of those statements. Go.
It is the same. What publishers decide on is different is what's being claimed.
Gamasutra just published that Online Passes will be disallowed on PS4.
That means my plan to call it an online-pass can not work.
Now every game needs to be a service-based game not a traditional singleplayer/multiplayer game.
This. I don't get the issue here.Unless Sony is actively lying, what they say is the closest we can get to facts.
Get prepared, you're going to hear this all gen.It was clarified again and again people will NOT be satisfied for unknown reasonless.
I already said that this will happem because sony tends to adapt to the industry.
Have a look at the ps3:they stripped a lot of functions during this generation....