brandonh83
Banned
A sequel to a demo... lol.
It's not, though.
A sequel to a demo... lol.
A sequel to a demo... lol.
...
Every day my opinion of Japan decreases by just a bit. No one should care but just saying...
...
I have to ask, why does Tabata or anyone at SE need to justify Cidney being sexy? This whole argument seems like it's extremely overblowing something that really shouldn't be an issue.
I have to ask, why does Tabata or anyone at SE need to justify Cidney being sexy? This whole argument seems like it's extremely overblowing something that really shouldn't be an issue.
A sequel to a demo... lol.
I can't wait until S-E signs another promotional deal, this time with AutoZone and then they dress Cindy up in the greasiest, manliest uniform possible and she gives you terrible customer service instead of being bubbly.
![]()
Pictured: The internet cheering for interesting character design.
They really shouldn't have to change their design to appeal to western ideals...that is the whole part of the Jrpg that I like...it is from a different culture and point of view.
Its really funny that Square and other companies got shat on hard for chasing that Western money and yet here we are and people are passive aggressively asking for the same shit.
The design is sexy and out of place in reality yes and the reasoning is a bit silly (come on son....we all know it is meant to be sexy...and thats ok) but jesus christ guys...it is really hard to read any Japanese Game thread with out the discussion going to the same shit and how people seem to want every game to be this homogenized, safe game that appeals to everyone and no one at the same time because pandering is bad.
I understand the sentiment but I can't say I am not tired of hearing it in every thread. We all want equallity and a better industry and all that jazz but holy shit, it really feels closer to "my way or the highway or at least I will passive agressively call you names and look down on you until you agree".
and again Cidney, a side character with very little importance to the plot, is really the least of the games worries...and yet...
I have to ask, why does Tabata or anyone at SE need to justify Cidney being sexy? This whole argument seems like it's extremely overblowing something that really shouldn't be an issue.
They really shouldn't have to change their design to appeal to western ideals...that is the whole part of the Jrpg that I like...it is from a different culture and point of view.
Its really funny that Square and other companies got shat on hard for chasing that Western money and yet here we are and people are passive aggressively asking for the same shit.
The design is sexy and out of place in reality yes and the reasoning is a bit silly (come on son....we all know it is meant to be sexy...and thats ok) but jesus christ guys...it is really hard to read any Japanese Game thread with out the discussion going to the same shit and how people seem to want every game to be this homogenized, safe game that appeals to everyone and no one at the same time because pandering is bad.
I understand the sentiment but I can't say I am not tired of hearing it in every thread. We all want equallity and a better industry and all that jazz but holy shit, it really feels closer to "my way or the highway or at least I will passive agressively call you names and look down on you until you agree".
and again Cidney, a side character with very little importance to the plot, is really the least of the games worries...and yet...
A sequel to a demo... lol.
I have to ask, why does Tabata or anyone at SE need to justify Cidney being sexy? This whole argument seems like it's extremely overblowing something that really shouldn't be an issue.
In that case I have no interest in enjoying media that comes from such a culture. If I'm a prudish nun for wanting a mechanic to dress properly for work then so be it. The problem here is that developer or marketer fails to understand why this is a problem and then the Marketer calls us hypocrites for wanting a female member in the group because female member apparently implies she has to be sex-pot despite previous games proving otherwise.
I would rather they went full Micheal Bay and have slow-mo closeups of Cindy's boobs rather than pretend she doesn't exist mostly for titillation
If I may make a few assumptions about why this complain keeps happening, I think it's a combination of
1) Final Fantasy historically having some western appeal beyond a super niche audience like say, Neptunia.
2) Final Fantasy sporting a more realistic (though stylized) aesthetic than some more niche JRPGs. What I mean is that it just sticks out more when a game has a more realistic design then a completely unrealistic looking, cartoony game.
This isn't meant as a "group A is right" or "group A is wrong" statement, mind. It's just an observation as to why this particular incident of a pandering design is getting a lot more attention/scrutiny.
Cause Japan is the only country in the world that sexualizes women? You yourself just listed Michael Bay an American as an example. Are you gonna boycott American culture now? lol
They don't need to. They should ideally be open and say, "Yes Cindy was designed for the boys, you can pose her and ogle her all you please" but instead they act all embarrassed and say she's not meant to be erotic
Are you saying Cindy covered head to toe in oil and grease wouldn't be sexy?
Having her crawl out from under a car all sweaty and mucky is more appealing than what we got
In that case I have no interest in enjoying media that comes from such a culture. If I'm a prudish nun for wanting a mechanic to dress properly for work then so be it. The problem here is that developer or marketer fails to understand why this is a problem and then the Marketer calls us hypocrites for wanting a female member in the group because female member apparently implies she has to be sex-pot despite previous games proving otherwise.
I would rather they went full Micheal Bay and have slow-mo closeups of Cindy's boobs rather than pretend she doesn't exist mostly for titillation
I remember someone asking Kamiya if he's ever apologized for Bayonetta and his exact response was "Apologize? No fucking way!".
So are we looking at new content, or just changes to the system and mechanics? I think some new enemies would be cool.
Confirmed Features
AXB enhancements
Camera and targeting system enhancements
Additional combat actions / overall re-balancing and bug fixes
More joint attacks (the current demo has one) and in terms of triggering it, it might be different currently available one.
Possible dodge roll inclusion.
The range of actions for each weapons has been improved.
MP recovery and usage has been adjusted, like not using MP for perfectly timed evades.
Titan bug will be fixed.
Under Consideration
Individual quests – These are quests where all four party members may not partake in. The mechanics are already in place and working, so Tabata thinks it’s possible to implement along with the quest data. For example, when the player decides what to do in the morning after camping, depending on the choice, Noctis and Prompto will be paired for that day. Or three of the party members might go together. Those days might have different conversations because the number of party members are different from usual. In battles, there will be situations where all four members aren’t present, so it’ll bring out different situations. Then, at night everyone gets back together to camp, and each character might bring what they acquired, or something like that. The final release version will be much more in-depth.
Frame rate stabilization – Not sure if this one can be added, as they’re still reevaluating data allot-age and how objects are being rendered. A decision will be made once they get a better sense of timing.
and that is your own point of view.. Stop trying to force it on everyone else by making yourself sound all high and mighty.
The sweet thing about being a human is that not all of us feel the same way and that's ok. I jump the gun a bit in this thread since it is technically on topic but in others it gets tiring reading through post after post of dudes/dudettes telling you that you should be outraged over a design and if you aren't you obviously are sexist (or a pedo). Again I am more than ok with people not liking the design, feeling it to be gross and I also agree that they should just admit it is a sexy design made to be sexy because there isn't anything wrong with that. I stop being ok with it when it starts to dominate threads not about it, people start putting down whole cultures and people, and generally start acting like some better than thou type jerkoff (not you btw). It is really hard to have a legit discussion of anything if one person is approaching it as if they are this superior being for not fucking liking a design.
This has bee gradually getting worse over the whole forum as of late. And I know I know, if I don't like it...then leave but still I just want people to know how irritating it can be to go into a thread and see the same arguments and no one respecting the other side making it more pointless.
This is what's on the table for 2.0
http://gematsu.com/2015/04/final-fa...full-report-episode-duscae-2-0-coming-mid-may
So are we looking at new content, or just changes to the system and mechanics? I think some new enemies would be cool.
Hah. If someone at Square does that, people (mainly GAF) will eat them alive for it.
Either way, too bad to see that this thread became mainly this... Guess I'll have to stop visiting FFXV threads too.
I don't care though, I've seen that they will be shitting all over the game's systems due to fans, so that's more than enough to kill a lot of my hype and make me go look somewhere else =X
So are we looking at new content, or just changes to the system and mechanics? I think some new enemies would be cool.
It's not like it is a first time such exaggeration is used. Watch this video - it does have some "mechanics" that even less dressed than Cindy.Like, there's nothing wrong with a female character being sexy, like, ever. Or males for that matter. That's perfectly fine. It's when the outfit is pander-rific in a way that feels completely out of place (for example, a mechanic wearing an outfit that most actual mechanics would not wear on the job) that eyebrows are raised. Give her a t-shirt and maybe some baggy pants while we're at it and she'd still be sexy as hell and look less like a "Hey boys, you like our game, riiiiiiiight?" character.
I don't feel they're being subtle about her role from a design perspective, but she does serve a role beyond that as a facilitator for vehicle-related gameplay. In my mind, she exists primarily as a game mechanic, and her design is mostly fluff. It's a personal choice.In that case I have no interest in enjoying media that comes from such a culture. If I'm a prudish nun for wanting a mechanic to dress properly for work then so be it. The problem here is that developer or marketer fails to understand why this is a problem and then the Marketer calls us hypocrites for wanting a female member in the group because female member apparently implies she has to be sex-pot despite previous games proving otherwise.
I would rather they went full Micheal Bay and have slow-mo closeups of Cindy's boobs rather than pretend she doesn't exist mostly for titillation
I feel anger over unfair treatment is a factor. Pretty people may not all have easy lives, but it cannot be denied that attractiveness can greatly impact your interactions and outcomes with other people. It's a huge advantage to have in life, and it is certainly not fair. It's understandable to strive for a level playing field, even when it's not realistic.I just remember what exactly it reminds me...
It's not like it is a first time such exaggeration is used. Watch this video - it does have some "mechanics" that even less dressed than Cindy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up7pvPqNkuU
And it's a perfectly mainstream video which heavily exploit sexualization of characters.
And I don't really understand the root of complaint. Every attractive girl I know exploit their attractiveness in some way. Not usually in such exaggerated way, but they still do use they attractiveness (and sexiness too) for their own benefit. Everyone, both men and women knows it, and music/film industry exploited it for decades. But it suddenly became bad if it's shown in game, that is just beyond my comprehension.
Point taken. But would you care to elaborate on the "other side" that isn't getting much air time? I also apologize if I insulted any culture or implied that you or anyone else was sexist.
My Final Statement on the Cindy issue: Me no like Cindy. Me not buy. Maybe second hand.
I just remember what exactly it reminds me...
It's not like it is a first time such exaggeration is used. Watch this video - it does have some "mechanics" that even less dressed than Cindy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up7pvPqNkuU
And it's a perfectly mainstream video which heavily exploit sexualization of characters.
And I don't really understand the root of complaint. Every attractive girl I know exploit their attractiveness in some way. Not usually in such exaggerated way, but they still do use they attractiveness (and sexiness too) for their own benefit. Everyone, both men and women knows it, and music/film industry exploited it for decades. But it suddenly became bad if it's shown in game, that is just beyond my comprehension.
Games have a history of being too pandering in their designs and the complaints come I think not from a desire to eliminate, but to balance.
Battles are too difficult( Japan found battles difficult, NA found them easy
2 ways they can go about this:
1) Make these grassland section interesting by having various uneven, unique surfaces and natural/man-made structures in its vicinity that "hides" the emptiness of an open grassland, like Colony 6/9 in Xenoblade.
I don't think the question is so much about mainstream as it is about balance. Games have a history of being too pandering in their designs and the complaints come I think not from a desire to eliminate, but to balance.
And FF gets more attention in this regard because it's considered one of the biggest franchises in the industry. It's, in effect, an industry representative, as it were.
I don't feel they're being subtle about her role from a design perspective, but she does serve a role beyond that as a facilitator for vehicle-related gameplay. In my mind, she exists primarily as a game mechanic, and her design is mostly fluff. It's a personal choice.
It seems a bit ridiculous to demand realism in design for the female NPC when all of the game's main cast of characters are dressed rather ridiculously (none of them are sensibly dressed). I don't quite understand your developer/marketer analogy; are you suggesting that women who bare skin are sex-pots?
I feel anger over unfair treatment is a factor. Pretty people may not all have easy lives, but it cannot be denied that attractiveness can greatly impact your interactions and outcomes with other people. It's a huge advantage to have in life, and it is certainly not fair. It's understandable to strive for a level playing field, even when it's not realistic.
We might not even get it. It depends on if they can even patch it to the public. If not, they'll have it at trade shows and the like.
The only thing I would really love.... is Japanese voice-overs. Was there an option to toggle English/Japanese in the demo?
The only thing I would really love.... is Japanese voice-overs. Was there an option to toggle English/Japanese in the demo?
We're also still missing Adamantoise in this area.
I don't think Adamantoise will be in Dusace. In the Adamantoise scene in the trailer, the area seems more barren, like desert-like.
But this is like one of the worst series to complain about in that regard.
They've said that it's in Duscae. Just not in the part where the demo happens.
#1.Noctis
#2.Gladious
#3.prompto
#4.Ignis
Anyone else?
If not what's your take?