It's the Transformers 2 of video games. Utterly without any soul or personality, but I guess some people are into that.
Yea, that alternate reality steampunk shooter where the ruggedly handsome protagonist shoots his way out of every situation shouldn't be mentioned together with that other game.
BSI is an FPS/RPG. The Order is a pure TPS. Both are story focused, but the gameplay is very different - they are only similar in that they both feature firearms. Art style and perspective is different. BSI is story driven but it's not "cinematic" in the same obsessive way that TO is.
It's also pretty apples and oranges if somebody is trying to say "well there are lots of great games that GAF hates". Which is pretty much what the person you quoted was responding to. This is not some vocal minority, the game got destroyed in reviews, 63 on metacritic for a hyped up AAA Sony exclusive game with amazing graphics that was hotly anticipated by many. When a major release with great graphics and a lot of polish is considered generally disappointing, it usually still gets into the 70-80 range based purely on its technical and artistic merits. This game was a disappointment by the standard of other disappointments. Individuals can enjoy it, love it even. But nobody should dare pretend its highly negative reputation is just contrarian tenancies from gaming hipsters.
Hey fellow gaffers
Well when the order came out I listened to GAF about how there is no camera control, no multiplayer etc etc
However I saw it today for £25 and was like ok let's give it a go
But GAF you failed to mention the game is really good!!!
It's fast flowing with the gameplay if you like gears of war style game play, the graphics are next to none - looks amazing!!
The first 10 minutes you cant do much but after that it goes all third person shooter style on my ass and moves great!!
Wish this game had sold a lot and not got slammed in to bad sales because it's a fantastic game
next time, don't listen to.people who only watch interviews and trailers and go to every singe thread to shit on a game. those are the people who have nothing else better to do.
There are several really good games that vocal parts of GAF love to hate. BioShock Infinite and Tomb Raider 2013 come to mind.
Order 1886 is another one of these games.
Play it a night with all the lights offThe game was part of my PS4 bundle and I've already sunk roughly six hours into it. It looks excellent, but other than that am I allowed to say I'm finding the game to be boring as all hell? Way too many people quick to assume everyone critical of The Order never even touched it, let alone played a large chunk of it.
I'm not seeing what difference that would make since it's not really a horror game despite the werewolves and such.Play it a night with all the lights off
It did seem to me that GAF had one of the most vocal "The Order"-" defense-forces". I don't get OP.
The thing everyone was most pissed about was that it was not worth $60, since you bought it at a discounted price and now you enjoy it, I don't see how the GAF misled you.Hey fellow gaffers
Well when the order came out I listened to GAF about how there is no camera control, no multiplayer etc etc
However I saw it today for £25 and was like ok let's give it a go
But GAF you failed to mention the game is really good!!!
It's fast flowing with the gameplay if you like gears of war style game play, the graphics are next to none - looks amazing!!
The first 10 minutes you cant do much but after that it goes all third person shooter style on my ass and moves great!!
Wish this game had sold a lot and not got slammed in to bad sales because it's a fantastic game
I must have been on a different "GAF" site then. The vast majority of posts I saw were critical of the game.It did seem to me that GAF had one of the most vocal "The Order"-" defense-forces". I don't get OP.
GAF has an unusually high proportion of Sony fans. Any review thread where a Sony exclusive doesn't meet expectations is glorious. See: Review threads for Uncharted 3 and The Order.
i think what gets lost in all the negative posts is that the gunplay is actually pretty good?
I think it's a better game than Uncharted 2 and 3, honestly.
It does somethings very well, others very poorly; unlike Uncharted, which I just feel is mediocre all around - the gunplay, story, protagonist, antagonist, enemy variety etc.
...that would do almost nothing because the game's problem is that it's right about 50:50 cutscenes and gameplay
I must have been on a different "GAF" site then. The vast majority of posts I saw were critical of the game.
Gunplay is a near-synonym for "gameplay", just with specific regards to shooting mechanics. It's how the game plays when you're shooting stuff.Pretty good gunplay doesn't actually mean anything to me.
Gunplay is a generic term for the discharge or exchange of gunfire.
Should you desire to convey meaning, you will have to use other words and make sentences with them.
here we go again, people still harboring the belief that everybody wants to hate this game.
most negative reviews still say the gun play is at the very least solid. the cover system, while dated, is effective, the guns have a ridiculous amount of punch, you feel like you're in control.
You barely use the guns in the game, especially the fun ones like the thermite rifle, and when ypu do use them, iys very repetetive and dull. the ai is lifeless, the level design is horrendous, and the pacing is arguably the worst there is. Its short as it is 5-8 hours... about 50 percent of that you're either watching, or is on rails. the enemy variety is non existent, the lycans are terrible. the list goes on. this game did have a lot of potential, but unfortunately RAD likely bit of more than they could chew.
I went into it knowing exactly what it was, and really enjoyed it. A solid 7.5 or 8 for me, for some reason it attracts a very large amount of hate on GAF. I don't know why people get so wound up about a critically average new IP, it's not like it's a terrible entry in a famous franchise or anything.
Honestly if the just swing the gameplay/cinematic ratio the other way they could have one hell of a franchise on their hands.
The thing is, there were tons of "solid 7.5 or 8" shooters that came out last generation and were completely ignored. The Order only recieved so much attention, because we're still early in the new gen and new releases are much bigger deal than they were a few years ago, at the end of last-gen.
The real reason is because it's a console exclusive at the beginning of a new generation. That's about it.
If it was just disappointment then yea, but the hate I have seen for this game seems disproportionate. You usually only see this amount of hate for awful games in prestigious franchises (RE6 and FF13 for example).
Pretty good gunplay doesn't actually mean anything to me.
Gunplay is a generic term for the discharge or exchange of gunfire.
Should you desire to convey meaning, you will have to use other words and make sentences with them.
The way The Order manage healing is interesting and more credible than other games in which you regenerate gun wounds for no apparent reason. That's still a pretty minor thing.
Gunplay is a near-synonym for "gameplay", just with specific regards to shooting mechanics. It's how the game plays when you're shooting stuff.
"Pretty good gunplay" means something just fine on its own. It's not much different from saying that a game has "pretty good gameplay".
I chalk it up mostly to console warrioring, which is always in much stronger effect near the beginning of a new generation than at the end of it.
Ryse was another game that nobody would have given half of a shit about if it was released at the end of last-gen, but found itself wrapped up in some nasty 2013 console war bullshit. It's just the way the cycle goes.
Yea I suppose. I compared it AC earlier (as that jump in quality is how I would like the sequel to go) but the game it reminds me of most is Heavenly Sword. Hyped Sony exclusive at the start of the gen, very nice graphics, very cinematic, short and not quite there gameplay-wise. I wasn't on GAF then but I imagine there was a similar situation with that game.
Yeah, Heavenly Sword is an absolutely perfect comparison.
The Order's gameplay was perfectly passable, to me. I've had a decent time with generic shooters before, and The Order probably won't be the last. It wasn't until I got to the face-slap that they call an ending, though, that my opinion of the game shifted straight into "bad game" territory.I actually quite liked Heavenly Sword (and Ryse and the Order). I think sometimes I am just in the mood for short cinematic action games, they are a nice pallet cleanser, particularly with most AAA games being 30 hour open-world games.
The Order's gameplay was perfectly passable, to me. I've had a decent time with generic shooters before, and The Order probably won't be the last. It wasn't until I got to the face-slap that they call an ending, though, that my opinion of the game shifted straight into "bad game" territory.
The Order put far too much of an emphasis on its story and characters to let the game end like that. Just absolutely no respect for the player, so I have absolutely no respect for RAD.
I wouldn't disagree with any criticism of the ending, I think it just bothered me less than most people tbh.
I felt like I got smashed over the head with a bag of hammers. The Order's ending should never be allowed to happen in anything outside of an episodic game.
Most games don't place nearly as much of an emphasis on story and characters as The Order did, which is why I'm particularly cross about it in this instance.Lol. Maybe I have been desensitised by almost every game having a sequel-bait ending nowadays.