neorej said:
IIRC the Jedi Council initially refused to train Anakin on account of being too old. This leads to Darth Vader, scourge of the galaxies, arch-nemesis of the Rebel Alliance.
Years later, Luke gets Jedi training from the guy who got proven right about not training people after a certain age. How is that NOT bad writing?
This topic is one of the central plot points of the entire saga. The Force being out of balance had as much to do with the Jedi as it did the Sith. Both orders were polar points along the same line. The balance (humanity) lay between them. Love and compassion require loss and pain to understand the consequences of both.
The Jedi forbid taking older children into their ranks because they want kids that have never known love in their hearts. If they take the child before it can learn the emotion, which is typically gained from your parents, then they will not have learned the fear of loss of either the tangible (loss of the loved one) or loss of the intangible (loss of the love someone provides to you) clouds their judgment.
The Sith relish in their emotions to the point where the fear of not being able to control and possess what their hearts desire leads them to destruction. Power corrupts what it cant control.
Anakin and Lukes heros journey are both the same taken under different models and having the result vary based on their life experiences.
The Jedi dont want to train Anakin because he was old enough to have learned what his mothers love was. They knew that this would cause problems. This point is made even more important by the opposite decision they made when it came to Lukes destiny.
The prequels make references to the living force. This living force is different from the Force. The living force was based out of the essence of human nature - living in the moment and following your heart. Qui-Gon was the main proponent of this philosophy. Unfortunately, the majority of this plot thread was excised from the finished films. Revenge of the Sith was originally going to have a conversation between Yoda and Qui-Gon where much of this was going to be explained. The discussion between Yoda and Obi-Wan later originally reflected the meaningful change in philosophy that Qui-Gon had imparted on Yoda. Originally, Obi-Wan was stated that he would take the boy and train him the way Anakin shouldve been trained. Yoda corrects him and says basically, leave him alone until the Force calls.
This fundamental change in the approach of training Luke in comparison to his father is what ultimately saves the entire galaxy. Luke grew up with love in his heart, he saw what pain of loss is about in the killing of his aunt and uncle, he learned that you cant control fate by letting your fear of loss call you into action as he did when he rushed to save Han and Leia, and ultimately, Luke learned the one thing that his father sought after almost his whole life you can save and protect the ones you love from harm and danger, through acts of self-sacrifice and love.
Even though Obi-Wan and Yoda dont believe Anakin can be redeemed, his son defies them. Because Lukes journey through life has taught the lessons of the living force, he understands that if he wants to save his father he must be willing to sacrifice everything, including himself. Ultimately, he teaches his father the same lesson and in doing so, Anakin is able to fulfill his destiny and bring the Force back into balance by destroying the old Sith order and the last of the old Jedi. In Luke, the Jedi are reborn in someone that doesnt shut his heart out to love.
The Force in the saga is the macguffin. Anakins quest for the power to prevent death of those you care about is moot. The power he lusted after was there all along. Its just he got hooked up with a bunch of people that said shut out your heart (the Jedi) and a person who said you need to control what you lust after (the Sith).
The real tragedy for Star Wars fans is that George Lucas had this great foundation but failed to keep what he originally scripted. If he had done so, this would have made much clearer sense.