Kotaku is reporting it.
Edit: and Eurogamer.
I wouldn't be surprised if no one at Sony has ever actually thought about this lol
So it's unreasonable for you to think someone wouldn't like looking at pictures from their friends until they didn't? I bet the people who reported him did unfriend him. It doesn't have to be either or; the report function exists for a reason. And you certainly can't control how people are going to use the report function, or what they get offended by. But if I uploaded a picture of digital genitals to PSN or NeoGaf, I'd expect at the very least to get reported. So at that point you're rolling the dice on moderation.
So someone reported, and then Sony's moderation team made a decision off that. So really what we're arguing is, does Sony have final say in what gets shared on PSN or do you and I? What do you think the answer is to that question?
This is really pathetic on Sony's part. I was considering buying a PS4 Pro but I'm certainly not giving them any of my money now.
The answer is Sony, of course - but surely then, it is incumbent on Sony to provide clearer guidance on what is and is not acceptable conduct? You can safely share an image of a game character shot in the head or cut to pieces (looking at you, MK).So it's unreasonable for you to think someone wouldn't like looking at pictures from their friends until they didn't? I bet the people who reported him did unfriend him. It doesn't have to be either or; the report function exists for a reason. And you certainly can't control how people are going to use the report function, or what they get offended by. But if I uploaded a picture of digital genitals to PSN or NeoGaf, I'd expect at the very least to get reported. So at that point you're rolling the dice on moderation.
So someone reported, and then Sony's moderation team made a decision off that. So really what we're arguing is, does Sony have final say in what gets shared on PSN or do you and I? What do you think the answer is to that question?
Like someone else said, kids will see it anyway. They will have watched porn and masturbated to sleep thousands of times by the age of 10 even if parents turn Safe Search on. People seem to be worried about virtual vaginas but are okay with these same children playing games where they can decapitate grandmas...
With things like this, I can't help but think about Helen Lovejoy and her popular "Will someone please think of the children?" dialogue line in The Simpsons. Let's think about the children! But in reality, it's more about the fact that (adult) people still feel disgusted with the depiction of the human body in videogames.
A bit sad that nudity is still taboo.
Update:
I got an email 30 minutes ago telling me that my ban is now 1 month because of a violation today.
Ubisoft has apologized and will remove it from the model
People really think the 30 day ban came, due to this thread on NeoGAF?
Next stop: product recall.This shit is getting out of hand.
People really think the 30 day ban came, due to this thread on NeoGAF?
Yeah this is absolute horse shit. How in the hell is Sony so bad at common sense shit like this?
People really think the 30 day ban came, due to this thread on NeoGAF?
you will get banned here if you post NSF pics in thread.... stand to reason you will get banned for posting them on PSN.
It kind of did happen after news sites began to pick up on this thread. It's also hard to think of a reason for why his ban would be expanded.People really think the 30 day ban came, due to this thread on NeoGAF?
What the fuckLike someone else said, kids will see it anyway. They will have watched porn and masturbated to sleep thousands of times by the age of 10 even if parents turn Safe Search on.
Next stop: product recall.
I can't believe Sony doubled down.
Difference is, the pic the OP took is an ingame asset. Do you think that equates to searching for a NSFW pic and posting it here?
Like someone else said, kids will see it anyway. They will have seen porn and masturbated to sleep thousands of times by the age of 10 even if parents turn Safe Search on. People seem to be worried about virtual vaginas but are okay with these same children playing games where they can decapitate grandmas...
With things like this, I can't help but think about Helen Lovejoy and her popular "Will someone please think of the children?" dialogue line in The Simpsons. Let's think about the children! But in reality, it's more about the fact that (adult) people still feel disgusted with the depiction of the human body in videogames.
A bit sad that nudity is still taboo.
har har. I agree completely with the poster though and will not buy another Sony product if this crap stands. Last straw for me. They're going too far.Oh come on now, you sound like a pussy
What the fuck
Sure, maybe they should. Especially since common sense isn't always so common. In those cases I don't think Sony would ever ban you for sharing that kind of content - content that was known and rated for the platform. Sony clearly didn't know this was in the game, and OP clearly knew it wasn't supposed to be in the game -- and yet he shared it publicly over PSN, and some people, maybe didn't want or expect to see that when they logged onto PSN. I think he exercised poor judgment; either he didn't know Sony had a report function and moderation team, or he thought that was okay to share. And maybe it could have been OK to share... but Sony disagreed, obviously.The answer is Sony, of course - but surely then, it is incumbent on Sony to provide clearer guidance on what is and is not acceptable conduct? You can safely share an image of a game character shot in the head or cut to pieces (looking at you, MK).
har har. I agree completely with the poster though and will not buy another Sony product if this crap stands. Last straw for me. They're going too far.
The first ban was dumb enough but then he gets an extension on the ban somehow even though he's already banned? How does that work? It doesn't work at all for me.
OP got juniored? Damn. What did he do?
OP got juniored? Damn. What did he do?
I thought the funniest part of this thread would be the pic of it in game, but it ended up being how many people had no idea crotchless panties existed.
You just made me LOL. Thank you!What if you streamed the game over live on playstation and are just doing your thing, murdering civilians, but suddenly a vagina appears on screen? would that be bannable?
The magic of creating another account.The funny part. OP is banned and Can't even download the patch for 30 days ._.
He was tagged when he was a junior.
You scared me for a second. I've had this tag since I was a junior in the long, long ago. It's kind of confusing but i'm quite fond of my status as best junior.
The funny part. OP is banned and Can't even download the patch for 30 days ._.
"Watchdogs 2 with vaginas, only on Xbox" would be hilarious, but I assume ubisoft will patch every versionMicrosoft should send this guy an Xbox One S, a month live card, and the game. They've been killing it on pr already, so I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that wasn't already in motion.
But the shift from one week to one month is a little silly. Hopefully the noise about the situation brings some clarity.
If he was banned already, what other reason would there be?
Yes. It didn't jump from a week to a month by itself.
They gave him week which is kinda reasonable, but then day later extended it to month. Only "online activity" between original ban and extension was basically creation of this thread.
#tinfoil
In any case month for something like this is just ridiculous and so out of proportion.