• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

JK Rowling under fire for appropriating Native American mythology on Pottermore

Status
Not open for further replies.

yepyepyep

Member
It seems like a situation where you can't win. If she didn't incorporate Native American mythology she would be accused of white washing American history.
 
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en

This seems to be the part in dispute:

I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.

But a First Nation medicine man or shaman is not the same as a bearded, robed Merlin wizard shooting fireballs out his hands. One is actually real!
 

Ri'Orius

Member
Also read about the issue Rowling took Native lore and said it wasn't true it was created by anti magic people aka probably white folk to oppress wizards.

Not white people, but Native Muggles. Like how Europeans oppressed and demonized witches in their way, so too did muggle Native Americans decide that the Animagi were evil beings.
 
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en

This seems to be the part in dispute:

I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.

Thats where I am at with this specific situation. Its not like those people who wear the religiously significant native american headdresses to music festivals where I can see it being offensive.

why-native-headdresses-no-longer-belong-at-music-festivals-1422361729577.jpg
 
People should consider reading the actual text before making sweeping judgments: https://www.pottermore.com/collection-episodic/history-of-magic-in-north-america-en

This seems to be the part in dispute:

I guess people are saying they don't want her using the skin walker legends? Otherwise it seems totally unobjectionable. Certainly ignoring Native Americans altogether and excluding them from her magical history would've been way worse.

Yeah, I don't see any problems there.
 
what if they were fans and they actually wanted to see her get this right?

but hey, complainers gonna complain, rowling can do what she wants and it does it even really matter, etc, etc. but lets leave the nihilism out of it.
Get what right? A historically accurate depiction of Native American culture in a fictional world where magicians with wands fly on brooms?

No matter the culture the whole thing is bullshit from the bottom to the top.
 

Jharp

Member
Nobody seemed to care when Blizzard did it with the Tauren in Warcraft.

Meh, this shit is inevitable in today's society and it's only going to get worse.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Dude I am really sorry to say this but the Egyptian's went through the exact same thing when the roman's came into power. Their original culture was basically eradicated most of their monument's where forgotten or pillaged to construct other structures. This of course doesn't lessen the tragedy that the native american's went through but they are not the only culture that was attacked like that.
What you are talking about happened so long ago that the Romans are gone too. I'm not excusing it but there is a difference. What happened to the Aboriginal people is incredibly recent. You know those schools that I mentioned? The ones where they tortured, raped and abused Aboriginal children while stripping away their culture? The last one in Canada closed in 1996. Right now, I think Aboriginal people are trying to reclaim their culture. As far as I know, today's Egyptians don't have to worry about that.
Walpurgis, didn't you like Until Dawn? Hypocrite much?
I haven't played it but I look forward to doing so when it is on sale.
 

hupla

Member
I remember people also being disappointed the Japanese wizarding School was named like something put in google translate (its Mahoutokoro which i saw just literally means Magic Place)
 

LOCK

Member
As a Native American I didn't take offense to the story, but I'm not Navajo either.

But as a Native American, I didn't infer any demeaning feelings from the author.

However, I do find her tweet to be offensive though probably not intentional.
 
So, from what I gather from looking at Jo's Twitter, a major detail here is that skinwalkers, as they are commonly known and present in American beliefs, are actually a Muggle-created myth in the Potterverse, invented to demonize indigenous American wizards... who I guess are just Animagi, using the same basic magical process that Europeans use in HP? (I may have that last part wrong)


I can... actually see why some people would be annoyed by that? Rowling saying that common European "Halloween" depictions of the Wizarding World being Muggle distortions seems a bit different from that.



I guess I'm also not that surprised since I've come across Native activists who outright deny any mainstream anthropological explanations of human migration to the Americas as just more European lies to undermine their beliefs and justify taking the land, which comes across as more extreme than this.
 

Dryk

Member
Appropriation is, as I understand it, taking something from another culture and presenting it as your own. That's why, for instance, Rock & Roll is an example, because very rarely are the black people involved in its creation given any credit. But if this story does present it as a Native American myth, and then puts its own spin on it to incorporate it into the general setting... I'm not sure that's an issue.
Appropriation is also the flippant use of elements of other cultures because they're exotic until they become commercialised or caricatured. The thing is that it's not necessarily always a bad thing and it's impossible to gauge the long-term effects of a trend until it's much too late to do anything about it. So people get really jumpy.

Not white people, but Native Muggles. Like how Europeans oppressed and demonized witches in their way, so too did muggle Native Americans decide that the Animagi were evil beings.
The way I read it she's saying that medicine men were charlatans who spread rumours about actual magical folk in order to demonise them and avoid their own exposure as frauds.

He wrote the actual devil of a pretty popular religion as a protagonist. But I guess that religion is dominant so it lacks the "appropriation" angle.
Some Christians did still get upset about him misrepresenting the devil as a sympathetic character though
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
I haven't played it but I look forward to doing so when it is on sale.

Huh. You made a post about its Metacritic score that only really makes sense if you'd played it.
 
Not white people, but Native Muggles. Like how Europeans oppressed and demonized witches in their way, so too did muggle Native Americans decide that the Animagi were evil beings.

Hmmmm. This kinda implies that Native spirituality and mysticism is a biological heredity thing rather than something anyone in the tribe can learn

Yeah this isn't the best story
 

Ri'Orius

Member
There's a bunch of fantasy out there with angels and God and the devil and shit all over the place. People just don't like it when a popular author does it apparently. Someone already mentioned Gaiman in the thread, there's a dude who just eats mythology and mashes it with everything until it works for his stories. No direct uproar I recall, though he's had a long career and I can't keep track of everything. (Although, to be fair, I believe most of the mythologies he mined were already dead or dead-ish)

Most of that that I've seen isn't saying "angels are really aliens" or otherwise directly contradicting the beliefs of real people. Those stories accept and build upon their religions, rather than undermining them.
 

woodland

Member
what if they were fans and they actually wanted to see her get this right?

but hey, complainers gonna complain, rowling can do what she wants and it does it even really matter, etc, etc. but lets leave the nihilism out of it.

I would probably say the same thing? People who have fiction passed down in their culture getting mad that a fiction writer is changing stuff to suit her own fictional book. Why should she be worried about this particular myth?
 
Alternative Thread Title: Doctorate-holding Twitter User is confused by lack of genocide and historically accurate portrayal in series about boys playing with each other Quaffles and Bludgers.
 
Appropriation is also the flippant use of elements of other cultures because they're exotic until they become commercialised or caricatured. The thing is that it's not necessarily always a bad thing and it's impossible to gauge the long-term effects of a trend until it's much too late to do anything about it. So people get really jumpy.


The way I read it she's saying that medicine men where charlatans who spread rumours about actual magical folk in order to demonise them and avoid their own exposure as frauds.

Oooh, that's not great.

As to the former thing, honestly, if it's not always a bad thing there should probably be separate terms for it :p
 
I swear her books need a preface that states that everything in them is complete fantasy and should not be seen as an accurate depiction of reality or cultures as they exist in the real world.
 
I wonder if she would have gotten a better response from those who were offended if she'd fleshed things out a bit more. It's a short passage from a very short piece of writing we're talking about here.
 

Fou-Lu

Member
The amount of times things like skinwalkers have been used in other fiction and no stink has been raised about it is rather large. Heck, everyone here would think Christians ridiculous for raising a fuss over the Shin Megami Tensei series or other JRPGs that utilize Christian mythology.
 
So, from what I gather from looking at Jo's Twitter, a major detail here is that skinwalkers, as they are commonly known and present in American beliefs, are actually a Muggle-created myth in the Potterverse, invented to demonize indigenous American wizards... who I guess are just Animagi, using the same basic magical process that Europeans use in HP? (I may have that last part wrong)


I can... actually see why some people would be annoyed by that? Rowling saying that common European "Halloween" depictions of the Wizarding World being Muggle distortions seems a bit different from that.



I guess I'm also not that surprised since I've come across Native activists who outright deny any mainstream anthropological explanations of human migration to the Americas as just more European lies to undermine their beliefs and justify taking the land, which comes across as more extreme than this.

My thoughts as well. The idea that indigenous myths part of a culture were invented to "demonize" said culture just doesn't sit right.

It's possible that she would've been accused of appropriation even if she hadn't written it this way, but to me what's troublesome is how she worked it into her universe.
 

Breads

Banned
I swear her books need a preface that states that everything in them is complete fantasy and should not be seen as an accurate depiction of reality or cultures as they exist in the real world.

We exist in the real world as does her books. So when she talks about real cultures the people she is describing have every right to offended.
 
She would probably get backlash if she acted like they weren't part of the history of a magical America too. Is this a no win scenario?
 

akira28

Member
Get what right? A historically accurate depiction of Native American culture in a fictional world where magicians with wands fly on brooms?

No matter the culture the whole thing is bullshit from the bottom to the top.

yes, yes, its religion so into the dustbin, etc. but it would have been really beautifully done if she actually did have culturally accurate depictions of Native American mythology and supernatural lore. These are people living in a post Christian society as animists and more, having to scrape for their very existence. And the trouble is, the author's standpoint is farther away from this than it should be, and doesn't seem to take into account the position of privilege she's in. So if they want to speak up, I support them. I'm sure a positive outcome is preferred to censorship.
 

hupla

Member
I think the best look for her in a situation like this is just mentioning that Aboriginal Wizards existed but as Colonialism accrued they where killed and forgotten? Mirrors the real world along with acknowledging them without her directly twisting potential real Aboriginal stories to fit into her universe
 
She would probably get backlash if she acted like they weren't part of the history of a magical America too. Is this a no win scenario?

Her best bet might have been to just mention it in the passing. Offer no information besides acknowledging it. I suspect that even then some people might be a bit upset but not as much as what is currently going on.
 

Breads

Banned
honestly the best way she could've done it. The other options are worse imo.Kind of a lose lose situation

So... optimally written Harry Potter backstory is more important than the marginalization of an entrenched people.


.... and you're acting like a preface changes anything when it literally changes nothing. Telling someone "it's not you though" won't stop them from taking offense.
 

Aureon

Please do not let me serve on a jury. I am actually a crazy person.
Actually yes to number 2. The Roman's basically destroyed Egyptian culture after they took over and same with the Greeks.

It could be argued that, culturally, the greeks conquered the romans as much as the other way around, if not more.
 
Can someone break down the issue here?

Because other cultures, such as Mexican, have cultural aspects and celebrations of their own appropriated on a global scale in an offensive fashion. Any reason it's mentioned with JK and it wasn't mentioned in a major fashion with basically anything else? I mean was it a big deal in Twilight (no clue I'm asking) when the native americans were half naked jean shorts male models?
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
I swear I read that 3 times and I have no idea wtf she's saying. Are all her books this ridiculous?

It's incorporating things the book readers know about. Animagi are Wizards who can assume animal form. At least in the UK, the ability was implied to be rare.
 

Zomba13

Member
I think it's fine. In her work, in her magic fake universe, the actual origin of certain myths, legends and religions are different than the actual origin from our real world. She isn't writing a documentary or history book, it's a work of fiction.

If she was writing about real Native American mythology and said "actually, it was made up by white anti-magic people to tarnish wizards and witches" then yeah, that is a problem because that is incorrect and not something that should be in a book about facts, but saying that in her fake magic world with fake non-real character and secret hidden worlds then it's fine.

Like how in Persona/SMT gods and mythological creatures are all demons. Vishnu is a demon. Obviously that isn't true because it's a work of fiction that takes religious gods and angels and demons and other mythological creatures and just says "what if they are all real, but are demons? And you can even make them by mixing together a bunch of unrelated demons?"

I mean, yeah, I can see it sucking when a myth/legend that is part of your religion is included in something but changed by the author to fit their world but then again it's something that happens all the time in fiction. I mean isn't there a currently running TV show in America about Lucifer/Satan being a nightclub owner/playboy who also solves crimes? Like, that is glorifying and misrepresenting the personification of evil in Christianity. I'm sure some Christians have an issue with that but I think that the show-runners should be able to do that just like I think Rowling should be able to do this.

And I'm not saying "they do this to Christianity so stop complaining when they do it to something else" I'm just saying this sort of thing is super common and it's something I love about fiction. Seeing different authors and creators put their own spin on various well known (and not as well known) myths, legends and creatures. As a kid Disney's Hercules got me super into Greek and Roman myths and I love finding out about obscure myths and legendary creatures from games and then looking up the actual origins and the actual myths.
 
and to speak up about it and take action if necessary. boy this is fun. we should hang out more often, chimpy.
When expressing yourself in any form don't ever use elements from my culture or resort to using stereotypes which are offensive to me.

If you're going to employ that line of thinking then you better be prepared to apply it to every culture and everyone who may be offended by your interpretation.
 
she could have called a native american. they have phones now.

she could have, yes

So... optimally written Harry Potter backstory is more important than the marginalization of an entrenched people.

.... and you're acting like a preface changes anything when it literally changes nothing. Telling someone "it's not you though" won't stop them from taking offense.

im not necessarily defending her but of all the options she had this is one of the least worst(?).
 

JC Lately

Member
Alternative Thread Title: Doctorate-holding Twitter User is confused by lack of genocide and historically accurate portrayal in series about boys playing with each other Quaffles and Bludgers.

Wouldn’t fit.

Anyway, I kind of figured this would happen as soon as I heard rumblings about her universe crossing the pond. Figured she’d either fall into the trap of ignoring Native culture all together and or include it and fuck up details/representation. Either way she’d be wrong. TBH, I’m not sure why she decided it would be worth the headache.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom