Sexualization isn't about arousal you know. No one is getting hot and bothered over low poly models
Yeah.......this isn't true. If people can get turned on by random objects in the real world, they can certainly get turned on by low poly models. :/
Sexualization isn't about arousal you know. No one is getting hot and bothered over low poly models
WTF?
It's really not about what you call it.
People want the game how it was made and sold in Japan. It doesn't matter if it's edited or censored or whatever for the west. It's just a word.
Many people buy Japanese games because they like Japanese games, not westernized versions of Japanese games.
lol, I think I've made my stance clear in that I'm very anti-censorship and also anti-GG in this thread, but I guess I should have put an /s anyway.
Yeah.......this isn't true. If people can get turned on by random objects in the real world, they can certainly get turned on by low poly models. :/
I knew a guy that jacked off to the low poly naked woman in Rampage World Tour.
Question, what is the context of the choices? Are there benefits to doing a negative choice?
Yeah, and to be fair the 2nd image it's like a prototype of the official illustration of Agnes in the game:Maybe at some point bondage was important to the game. Or maybe it was promo art. BioShock Infinite's art book for the first couple of pages shows unused concept art of enemies that were modeled after the original game before they decided to go with a more Americana theme. It's nice to see all stages of what a game goes through in development. Where it started and what the final vision was.
Don't care about costume changes, doesn't affect gameplay. I do care if quests were gutted though. If that's true this is a no buy. If it's to save a buck for localization then that's terrible unless the game is cheaper as a result.
Yes, people are validly uncomfortable with being on the same side as a movement that has been co-opted to a rather significant degree by a violent hate group
This isn't like "Hitler liked dogs", this is "this one, small movement has a lot of negative elements that directly affect me and thus I find it uncomfortable to associate with it."
Not Nintendo, but didn't Sega do this with some of the Yakuza games and had a pretty large backlash?Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
Out of curiosity, has anyone been playing the European version here and can say there aren't multiple endings to quests? I am more than willing to raise pitchforks over it, but I want to make sure it's not misinformation first.
They're not handling it, but we have gotten fewer VA choices in Xenoblade X and Fire Emblem Awakening (though that was also due to having Japanese VA in.)Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
Yeah.......this isn't true. If people can get turned on by random objects in the real world, they can certainly get turned on by low poly models. :/
You yourself are calling it a small, fringe movement.
Censorship, whether in movies, games, books, etc is not a fringe issue, it's a very broad one even when it's self-censorship. Thinking you're associating with a fringe group because of this one issue is really weird to me. If Hitler is too strong a comparison but we're still going for broadness (because that's what censorship is), you might as well say "I'm uncomfortable playing video games because gamergate is now one of the faces of gaming".
I won't say you're not allowed to feel this way, it's just an alien mindset to me.
They're not handling it, but we have gotten fewer VA choices in Xenoblade X and Fire Emblem Awakening (though that was also due to having Japanese VA in.)
Well we'll never know if the quests were cut to cheapen the cost of VAs. The best way to describe this "if ffx international was the original release and everyone else got plain vanilla ffx which is less content" and even then it's not explaining the point good enough, this change lowers value for people who replay games.Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
"Fringe"
The thing of all this is, for how you made a post intimating that people were calling members of the movement GamerGaters, you're actively making false accusations of things I've said. I said it was small, and that's about it.
Aren't there countries in Europe that have strict laws against the depiction of bondage? That might be why stuff in the artbook was removed.
As for them shuffling around quest endings, I have NO idea.
Well, Germany's gaming laws are strict af, so it could be their fault.
What do you mean VA choices? Like, for the avatar character?
For one Magnolia has a more obviously grown up woman body, so the pedophilia overtones are gone.
This is strange. Were there complaints in Japan about those sidequests?It's actually not just costumes and the art book. Like I posted in the OT, they censored multiple sidequests to make the outcomes appear less negative. This actually affects the story.
What do you mean VA choices? Like, for the avatar character?
A child with boobs is worse than a child without boobs, I think would be the reasoning here
Out of curiosity, has anyone been playing the European version here and can say there aren't multiple endings to quests? I am more than willing to raise pitchforks over it, but I want to make sure it's not misinformation first.
But they're not children though? They're just chibi. I can absolutely understand why someone would make that distinction, depending on how the character is viewed in terms of sexuality.
Do you think the average journalist can tell the different between a chibi character and a child?
They're trying to avoid having their game plastered all over the news with headlines like SICK PEDO GAME CORRUPTS CHILDREN or whatever.
What I don't get is the rationale behind the Native American to cowboy change. So it's insensitive to include a member of a massacred people but it's perfectly OK to include the ones that massacred them?
Do you think the average journalist can tell the different between a chibi character and a child?
They're trying to avoid having their game plastered all over the news with headlines like SICK PEDO GAME CORRUPTS CHILDREN or whatever.
The character in question is shown in regular full size in the game's CG, there's no mistaking her for a child.
Doing a quick search online while the characters seem to all be adults in both versions of the game after the time skip between default and second. In Default the characters were aged up a few years in the Western version since they were teenagers in the Japanese version.
Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
Assuming Nintendo is handling this, I don't think they'd do that - have they ever straight-up cut out content just to save money on VA/translation?
I did one of the quests that the GameFAQs guy mentioned, and it was changed. Other people have mentioned the details of the various quests (I don't really want to get too into spoilers), but in the sidequests you have to choose between fighting two different people because of their points of views on things, and people can end up dying in the outcomes that were removed. There's another outcome later in the game that involves spoilers that they replaced it with, which is less negative.
What I don't get is the rationale behind the Native American to cowboy change. So it's insensitive to include a member of a massacred people but it's perfectly OK to include the ones that massacred them?
Daily reminder that these characters are supposed to be 15 years old.
But that story change? Weird.
Remind me who is 15?Daily reminder that these characters are supposed to be 15 years old.
But that story change? Weird.
I think thats why we were missing Navi Trackers in Four Swords Adventures, but thats the only example I can think of.
Does Professor Layton count? I'm gonna be honest and say I'm not entirely sure where Nintendo steps in with that franchise so it could be Level-5 but they removed an RPG mode from one of them for Europe because translation would be too much money. They didn't even include just an English version, not even for UK. Game was full price as far as I remember too.
So costume changes I can understand but the quest ending removal sounds like a pretty strange decision. I feel like there's a reason that's not so apparent from the OP. Do any of these side quests endings have some potentially objectionable content you wouldn't find in the first game? ATM it looks like S-E was just cutting corners with the dub budget.
It's more "okay" to have a Cowboy caricature because: 1) Cowboys aren't a race, and 2) Cowboys didn't have a genocide committed against them.
That... doesn't matter? You're assuming that news agencies are inclined to be honest instead of prone to sensationalizing everything.
What audience was this game initially designed for?
...JRPG fans. Who are probably kids too!
Problem is, doesn't that apply to every game to feature such a style? If FFVII was released today, what would they say of the brothel scenes?