Off-Kilter
Banned
This is one of those things that I'd love to have even knowing full well that it will tank. And I never thought I'd see a translucent purple videogame system ever again yet here we are
CDs are cheaper, true, but CD drives are expensive and prone to failure. These guys want their cartridges to still be playable in 100 years (literally - they've chosen a special type of flash rom for their cartridges that can last 100 years).
But what if you like the Atari Jaguar.That makes sense. I just wish it wasn't so ugly.![]()
I just don't like the choice of case/controller. I would have liked to see a CD based system (because CD's are cheaper, IIRC), using maybe a Neo Geo CD console as the base. That would have been boss. I unno. I don't know anything about that. But I do know I don't like the Jaguar console and carts, no matter how many colors they come in.
The same huge collectors market who spends hundreds on old games (and even more on copies with cases and manuals). If they only cared about the the easiest way to access old games, retro stores like the one I work at wouldn't have been in business for 4 years, now. Digital distribution is not "fun" for alot of people. Some people want consoles and physical media. I know I do.
I said NEW. I understand the appeal of retro systems people played growing up. A new one is the part that is insane to me. Whats the appeal? Its not classic games, its going to be a bunch of new retro games that would be easier to play and cheaper in a digital format then a cartridge.
I pledged $150 for Volgarr the Viking's Kickstarter so I could have this:
![]()
![]()
There are crazy people out there who love special collector's editions, and I imagine a Retro VGS version of a retro-style game would be a pretty cool collectible.
I'm still really salty about that. It seems like the days of collecting awesome games for cheap is nearing at its end.The same huge collectors market who spends hundreds on old games (and even more on copies with cases and manuals). If they only cared about the the easiest way to access old games, retro stores like the one I work at wouldn't have been in business for 4 years, now. Digital distribution is not "fun" for alot of people. Some people want consoles and physical media. I know I do.
WHY DID NOBODY TELL ME WHYFor people like me![]()
Digital takes most of the fun out of it, for me.I said NEW. I understand the appeal of retro systems people played growing up. A new one is the part that is insane to me. Whats the appeal? Its not classic games, its going to be a bunch of new retro games that would be easier to play and cheaper in a digital format then a cartridge.
I said NEW. I understand the appeal of retro systems people played growing up. A new one is the part that is insane to me. Whats the appeal? Its not classic games, its going to be a bunch of new retro games that would be easier to play and cheaper in a digital format then a cartridge.
But what if you like the Atari Jaguar.
It's OK, I don't think anyone actually likes the Atari Jaguar.Then this should be right up there alley. Its honestly an issue for me. I never liked the console and it was one of the main reasons I steered clear of it when it came out!
I may be weird in that aspect though. I do go crazy over what I think is an attactive console design. Even if it's offerings aren't good.
Then this should be right up there alley. Its honestly an issue for me. I never liked the console and it was one of the main reasons I steered clear of it when it came out!
I may be weird in that aspect though. I do go crazy over what I think is an attactive console design. Even if it's offerings aren't good.
He knows. He just thinks the Atari Jaguar looks hideous.You do realise it's the Atari Jaguar in console base design only?
Then this should be right up there alley. Its honestly an issue for me. I never liked the console and it was one of the main reasons I steered clear of it when it came out!
I may be weird in that aspect though. I do go crazy over what I think is an attactive console design. Even if it's offerings aren't good.
The same huge collectors market who spends hundreds on old games (and even more on copies with cases and manuals). If they only cared about the the easiest way to access old games, retro stores like the one I work at wouldn't have been in business for 4 years, now. Digital distribution is not "fun" for alot of people. Some people want consoles and physical media. I know I do.
I dunno. People going after retro games or importing physical versions of digital games aren't doing that because they just love the old way or things. They are doing it because they love that classic system or those classic games, they want to build or complete their collection, they might find the old games cheaper than the digital re-release on the modern systems. They aren't just "Oh cartridges? Yes please! What? No, CDs, blu-ray and dvd are all icky and gross and don't even get me started on digital!". I mean, I'm certain there are some like that but I doubt they'd be interested in a new (not retro, not old, not classic) system with new games that just come on a plastic cart.
Nobody likes the Atari Jaguar. Even Rayman was better on the Saturn
I dunno. People going after retro games or importing physical versions of digital games aren't doing that because they just love the old way or things. They are doing it because they love that classic system or those classic games, they want to build or complete their collection, they might find the old games cheaper than the digital re-release on the modern systems. They aren't just "Oh cartridges? Yes please! What? No, CDs, blu-ray and dvd are all icky and gross and don't even get me started on digital!". I mean, I'm certain there are some like that but I doubt they'd be interested in a new (not retro, not old, not classic) system with new games that just come on a plastic cart.
What exactly am I looking at.
Not sure what you're trying to say here. If I remember correctly Jaguar version had not made the bells slippery (if it made anything slippery) unlike any other version I have seen (PC, PS1, GBA) and this effectively made Allegro Presto easier, but that doesn't make it better, you know.bullshit it was
![]()
What exactly am I looking at.
Not sure what you're trying to say here. If I remember correctly Jaguar version had not made the bells slippery (if it made anything slippery) unlike any other version I have seen (PC, PS1, GBA) and this effectively made Allegro Presto easier, but that doesn't make it better, you know.
The NBA Jam TE port was fantastic. As often as the DOOM port is mentioned in a positive light, I thought it was garbage. The graphics were overly grainy, even for DOOM, and the lack of music during gameplay made the game feel stale and boring.bullshit it was
![]()
The NBA Jam TE port was fantastic. As often as the DOOM port is mentioned in a positive light, I thought it was garbage. The graphics were overly grainy, even for DOOM, and the lack of music during gameplay made the game feel stale and boring.
I have not played the Jaguar version no, but I haven't seen any tangible evidence of the Jaguar version being better other than load times. (People often cite more animations and colours but again I never saw those demonstrated and my impression always was that it was Jaguar fans grasping at straws) but I know about several tangible differences between the Saturn and Jaguar versions. Ultimately the two versions are very much different, so I guess you would be excused to like either. I was hoping for a more informative response since I am actually curious.I can tell you haven't played these games
I never had a Jag CD so I never got to play Iron Soldier 2, but Iron Soldier 1 was a kickass mech game that was extremely underrated.There is also stuff like Tempest 2000, Zero5, Missile Command 3D, Iron Soldier 2, Skyhammer, Battlesphere, Battlemorph, and Ruiner Pinball, not to mention really good ports of Syndicate, Cannon Fodder, Pinball Fantasies, Zool 2, Flashback, Another World, Total Carnage, and Pitfall.
I never had a Jag CD so I never got to play Iron Soldier 2, but Iron Soldier 1 was a kickass mech game that was extremely underrated.
For example, the same sort of person that will import DMC4SE from Japan because of physical version.
I don't understand why this has turned into a Jaguar dumping thread. The only resemblence to the Jaguar is the design of the base console, not the libarary of games, controller or specs.
"Previously only available in limited quantities for the Super NES and currently selling in the $150 range at auction is Super 3D Noah's Ark. We are working with Piko Interactive to make a version available to RETRO VGS gamers for a much lower price"
![]()
Interesting. I remember this game was pretty infamous on the SNES.
As a collector, there's a fuckton more to collecting than "here is physical shit go buy it". One might want DMC4SE physical because:
1: They want to collect Capcom games, games from one of the best and most storied third party developers all the way back to the 8 bit era
2: They want to collect PS4 games, a popular console by an extremely popular brand which will surely have a great library to fill
3: They want to collect DMC games, a popular series with a very unique feel
One might want some unknown game for this unknown console because:
1: ???
2: ???
3: Says Retro on it, p legit?
4: Jaguar???
You can't just make it collectable because it exists. This project seems super silly to me and basically has zero of the charm a real retro console or retro game does.
That's cool! I'd totally be all over this! I wonder if they've considered or have contacted Atari about re-releasing the Jaguar games as well.
I'm super pumped for this system. Plug it in and play. No internet, no dlc, no massive day 1 patches. AWESOME!
I think this will get some serious buzz once they reveal those third party games that are in development. Get Capcom and Sega on this thing!
Atari doesn't own the rights to the Jaguar games. Atari only owns the name Atari and the IPs. Hasbro still owns the actual Jaguar library.
Well the team behind the system have hinted at some pretty big things happening behind the scenes regarding games and developer support.
They must nail the price on the system. I can't see paying more that $150 for it. $200 would be my absolute top price. Even then, those prices are pushing it. If they think they're going to be above $200, they might as well not bother.
Ok cool thanks. Hmm. Hasbro would probably be a pain to deal with.
Don't forget it comes with two controllers and the packin game, I think I read they were aiming at somewhere around $170 to $200 for the package. Though if they make it powerful enough to do PS1-style games it would be more expensive (they weren't sure if they wanted to last I heard).
Noah's Ark 3D really is the sort of thing they should be getting on here: Older, rarer games not available elsewhere. Does anyone know the capacity of the cartridges? I'd hope they'd be at least enough to accomodate CD games of the era.
Super noahs ark 3d is coming to steam.
I respectfully disagree. The slipperiness was that part that made it feel special like it should.Making bandland slippery made the game so, so much worse.
RetroVGS said:Hey Everyone! We are trying to offer a good mix of games for the console. A blending of new games from new developers, new games from indie and homebrew dev's with good track records, ports of great newer retro titles previously only available digitially and games from larger more established and well known developers. And even some ports of qwerky games that are harder to find or to expensive in their current states. We are going to launch the Kickstarter with somewhere around 20 games announced (and you can create your own bundle) and again there will be games there for everyone's tastes. And even more games will come on board before the console ships next year. So sit back and enjoy the announcements and start creating your wish list![]()
In interviews they've said game prices would range from around $20 to around $40-$50: $20 for simple indie games, the $40-$50 range for well known licensed titles.How much are the games going to cost?