Looks like a medieval blooodborne knock-off
Poe's law at work.
Looks like a medieval blooodborne knock-off
Guess I'm never going to beat Witcher3, MGS5 or Fallout 4...ever.
One question I have - new to the Souls genre with BB which I loved and still play months after Platinum-ing it...I have immersed myself in the lore and enjoy reading the theories here or on reddit or even in the Official Guides.
Is there a similar lore story to the DS universe? Where can I read up on it all prior to DS3. At the moment I'm about 10% of the way through SOTFS (havent played DS1) and its a bit confusing re. overall storyline and lore of this world.
Any help apprecaited for a Hunter.
Looks like a medieval blooodborne knock-off
Sorry, I still don't get what it has to do with the post you originally quoted ^^;
Maybe I'm just being dense.
I need a coffe to understand and explain this.
I'll have to stock on coffee when this game comes out.
.
Needs better organization in general. The lack of organization and multi-select really hinders your ability to manage (read: sort through and get rid of) Blood Gems.I wouldn't mind not having to scroll through everything (even with quick scrolling) to map my hunter tools, I'll give you that.
He needs to do another Demons Souls run and actually beat the fucking game so the world might be mended.Epic Name Bro's latest Dark Souls playthrough is great. It's called From the Dark and is a thorough and considered journey, showcasing many different builds and approaches to encounters as well as a careful look at the lore and stories in game.
I keep seeing mentions about a "bloodborne engine". Has it ever been confirmed to not be using the original Dark Souls or Dark Souls 2 engine?
Yes, I think it has been confirmed.
I don't think DS2 used the same engine as Demon's/Dark 1 though.
This seems like the most recent DS3 thread. Has there been a US announcement of any kind of collector's version for PC?
I dont believe so.
Any word what framerate the PC version of the game will be?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skGtbjWaXTQ
New video by Vaati, going over the new info. Nothing new, but it's nice to have it all in one place.
Any word what framerate the PC version of the game will be?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skGtbjWaXTQ
New video by Vaati, going over the new info. Nothing new, but it's nice to have it all in one place.
Are there higher resolution shots somewhere? I want 1080p versions at least for desktop background.
The battle arts...I don't know.
The weapons in Bloodborne were flat out great. It's what made the game out do a lot of action games in their own right.
![]()
I was watching some DS3 beta footage and the combat looked so...backstab fishing-ish. I don't know, Bloodborne was an RPG that did action better than most dedicated action games, I hope they don't backtrack from that in DS3.
Plus, being more like DkS1 means being the best for PvP. Say what you want, but DkS1 has the best PvP.I hope they do. There is merit to the current DS system, where it's more focused on build variety and methodical gameplay. Let BB be its own thing, and let DS do what it does best.
And then, they can up the ante with even more aggressive oriented gameplay in Bloodborne 2.
How about that first screen with the city in rubble with the dripping sun? I haven't seen that in 1080p anywhere.
Plus, being more like DkS1 means being the best for PvP. Say what you want, but DkS1 has the best PvP.
Plus, being more like DkS1 means being the best for PvP. Say what you want, but DkS1 has the best PvP.
I haven't played 2, but from what I reading and watching, it has the strongest PvP following.
BB's system was flawed from the start. That game should have been the best PvP with its deep combat mechanics.
Everyone endless fishing for instant backstab kills constantly and not using any other kind of tactic is not the best PVP. It was too easy to pull off as well as glitchy as hell. Backstabs from the front all the time, it just didn't make sense.
I find him pretentious and hate that he's become the end-all, be-all of Souls lore enthusiasts. At least he's starting to cite others in the community and not stealing from other uploaders and random fans on Reddit.
I find him pretentious and hate that he's become the end-all, be-all of Souls lore enthusiasts. At least he's starting to cite others in the community and not stealing from other uploaders and random fans on Reddit.
Yes, citing sources should be a given. As long as he's giving credit where it's due, and making it clear that his speculations/interpretations are just that, then I guess he can say whatever he wants.
I think part of me is just bitter because I probably couldn't do what he does, to the extent that he does it. We all have different lives with different priorities, but Souls is just as important to me, and sometimes I dislike the way it's "handled" by the community.
Waifu spotted. I don't know if she'll trump the Maiden in Black/Lady Maria+Plain Doll but let's hope she's more engaging than the Emerald Herald.
I'm so torn on Vaati's coverge.
On one hand, his videos have high production values, and he puts a lot of effort into making himself clear and understood. But on the other, he seems to embody the industry reporting standard of simply regurgitating information and posing basic questions that don't really amount to anything.
Even this simple video, showcasing a bunch of stuff that's recently been released on official sites, etc. is peppered with little inconsistencies. His attempts to pick apart the Japanese are particularly cringeworthy, especially when he tries to renounce established terms and lore.
For example, "Ludleth of Courland is a self-proclaimed Lord of Cinder". This is a simple sentence, providing us a new character, new location, and affirming the idea that there are multiple Lords of Cinder. This is plenty of food for thought in and of itself.
When Vaati says stuff like "Courland Ludres(th) proclaims himself the King of Kindling", it's just misleading and frustrating. It's like he doesn't respect what the localisation team have been doing since Dark 1, and he doesn't seem to appreciate that these are terms and concepts that have been given the green light by publishers and marketers of the game.
Also little nuggets of wisdom like "if the character weren't wearing plate armour, I'd think this was Bloodborne". Yeah, thanks for that. Keep fanning those flames of ignorance.
-_- Ugh. Sorry for the outburst. I know he's just one guy giving his fanbase what they want, but sometimes the discrepancies and "need for attention" with baseless observations get to me.
I find him pretentious and hate that he's become the end-all, be-all of Souls lore enthusiasts. At least he's starting to cite others in the community and not stealing from other uploaders and random fans on Reddit.
Yes, citing sources should be a given. As long as he's giving credit where it's due, and making it clear that his speculations/interpretations are just that, then I guess he can say whatever he wants.
I think part of me is just bitter because I probably couldn't do what he does, to the extent that he does it. We all have different lives with different priorities, but Souls is just as important to me, and sometimes I dislike the way it's "handled" by the community.
I like how he started to give credit to the oficial sources rather than implying he discovered or found the dots to put his theories.
Then you understand most of his info is a recopilation of many sources on the internet than his, which is kinda sad because most of the people go to his videos instead of the original sources, even Gaf have some sources in the lore section then being briefly mentioned on his videos as "some people found"
Any word what framerate the PC version of the game will be?
Any Dark Souls 3 from now to release should include "No, we don't know what the PC framerate is yet" in the title.