The thing that doesn't really feel right about the situation to me is that we don't have a lot of info on the specifics of what he did, yet the court of public opinion has ruled that he's never going to work in games again. Which depending on what he's done I would be fine with, like if he's messaging tons of girls and asking them for nudes out of the blue that's pretty creepy. And, I completely understand that we have no right to all the information as it's private to the Woman who have spoken out, but that hasn't stopped any number of game's media tweeting post mortem's and giving their takes on the situation, all under the assumption that he's very guilty, which maybe they have more info than we do, but still kind of rubs me the wrong way.
I'm not saying I don't believe the women who have spoken out either, it's incredibly difficult to come forward, especially in a situation like this where the guy has a following. The tough but I think necessary part of coming forward in a situation like this is that there needs to be some sort of evidence to corroborate the claims. This evidence definitely exists (again not saying it should be public twitter record) and I'm sure those at Polygon doing the investigation will seek that evidence out, but we and I assume those other games media people don't have that info, and it bugs me a bit. Mostly because I can imagine a situation where this guy is messaging girls thinking they are also interested, but are probably just being polite not wanting to offend a member of the press with influence.
Pretty much just a long way of saying I don't like people commenting before they have all or a reasonable amount of information. And I have a bad habit of playing devils advocate.