I think there's a good chance some old friends will be coming back in droves before long. Unless they can bury and hide the abomination that is yesterday's thread started by a mod, highlighting a study showing less than a couple percent of straight people will sleep with a trans person (and claiming those views are "outrageous"), and which promptly resulted in bans if you had the audacity to say you would not have sex with a trans person either. Although this may read like an Onion article, this actually happened.
That thread was interesting for a number of ways:
- Brazil ignoring the bigger number of straight women not wanting to deal with transgender people in a relationship. Exactly one user tried to address this, but he consistently refused that. To me, that right off the bad is an example of bad faith posting because one only focusses on cis white men.
- Robin making that thread, but containing a study that clearly makes no distinction between pre-op or post-op trans people, and also features multiple things you could vote for. There is a 12% number mentioned and they are surprised it is so little. What can you expect when you have more than 3 options to vote for?
All in all that singular study is definitely not a fact, but rather incomplete. In any other case you would not have used that as a definitive marker to establish discussion, but asked for additional evidence. None of those things are happening there. The biggest numbers get ignored, a few agree that the study isnt exactly
deep but most just run with the conclusions. Some go even further and state that you are a bigot if you decline to date transgender people (Again not stating whether one is pre-op or post-op). This is the kind of passive-aggressiveness ive come to expect from that movement, which includes a few staffers. I call these lot
The Names, because this small circle of people ruin it for all the other staff members that work there. You can't
force people with different sexual interest to date you, nor do people like being told who or what they should date. The fact that some users in that thread actually
expect this or see this is a goal is very, very
strange. Again, its aggressive shit like that that won't advance trans acceptance around the states. All it does is that the majority, already unknown to this 0.1% minority, are
even less interested in this movement. And i think that is terrible because i dont think everyone of that minority is that extreme,
at all.
Its the same with the Chloe Sagal suicide. Pages upon pages saying
fuck you Kiwifarms when in reality, Kiwi's thread on her was 6 months inactive before the suicide occurred, and multiple staff has expressed how terrible this situation is. Nobody on ERA mentions this, because, it apparently is already decided that Kiwi is the scapegoat. And because stating otherwise will inevitably lead to a ban, you get page upon page of people just saying
fuck you alt-right, fuck you kiwi, fuck you this, fuck you that. That isn't a healthy basis for critical thinking.
I considered starting that thread here. I saw it before they did.
Would make a good tie-in to my thread about suicide.
Glad to see you here Phoenix.
I got permed myself but thats for another day.
Does anyone know any method by which I could talk to moderators of Reset and/or attempt to ban appeal? I miss these old Neogaf communities that moved to Reset.
It is definitely unusual that they have yet to reply to you. I know some staffers email, but i dont think linking it is allwoed.
I'm not on the PC Gaming Discord, no.
Also I appreciate your help! Although this is one of the emails I was talking about. I've emailed this email twice in the past about the ban and never received a reply (although its worth noting this was back in October, VERY shortly after the ban). I also tried SweetNicole's Reset email back in December. I guess its nice to know they check it, although that just means they either missed mine, ignored it, or felt it best to not respond. :/
I don't know what's worse. Not getting any reply or getting a response that is essentially a boilerplate comment that does not address your points.
It should be said though that
clearly The Names are understaffed. There are a lot of staff members, but not everyone is part of that group. I say
that group because whose names pop up most of the times on other places? Its always the same 4-5 people. It might very well be that they just forgot about it.
EDIT: Nevermind! I actually received a response this time! Although its looking like my timing for this was really bad. Basically I've been told that my issue isn't something that they can revisit presently. Which I guess this gives me a little closure. Its been nearly a year. I guess waiting longer wouldn't be too bad.
Trust me, I've tried. There's just not enough activity here to revitalize them. The forum is certainly healthier than it was back when people first took leave, but it's still not quite as active as it once was to the point where there just aren't enough people interested in such threads unfortunately.
They said similar to my permban. And well, that i had prior infractions. Yet i still dont know to this very day why i got my very first ban, no postings were hostile, the ban was not even for a post but
for general behavior. Out of nowhere. To this day i dont get what it was that made me get that ban, and lengthy PM replies didnt help either.
Yeah they've been giving that to everyone sadly. I'd love to get unbanned from there but well that's probably not gonna ever happen.
Realistically I shouldn't have been banned but like that's really not gonna changed they blamed me for something I never did.
You would be surprised how long that goes on. I even got banned from 2 discords referring to these bans, but they were made by regular members. How would they know of it, unless they are friends with The Names? It is incredibly annoying to see already questionable bans getting used as some kind of
evidence to justify a ban from Discord. Especially when you get called a nazi and you have been nothing but civil in that discourse.
I wish they
listened and gave
actual reasons that people can learn from. Not these cheap copy-pasta reasons like
history of similar behavior. The fact that one gets used so much, should be asked to the staff: If it happens so often, perhaps that implies not a problem with the user, but with the staff member in question?