• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

(ONM) Senran Kagura Burst is damaging the industry - here's how to stop it

Yes. Who do you think exaggerated anime boob products are aimed at? It's part of the creepy Akiba otaku sub-culture, for young men whose hobbies are arranging expensive action figures on their shelves, posting on 2ch, playing eroge and masturbating. It's a niche.

A creepy niche.

I'm not exactly sure your broad stereotyping is necessarily helpful to this conversation.
 

EmiPrime

Member
Well, sorry to be ignorant on this matter because I don't exactly follows literature news. But my point is that the content of this ONM article, and how they wrote it overweight the size and possible audience of the game. For 50 Shades of Grey to damage the industry of literature is have some weight to it because its literary selling millions. Senran Kagura meanwhile will hardly break 100k worldwide (excluding Japan) and it'll serve for niche audience that already accustomed to such thing. Exaggeration wouldn't get your point accross rather than being taken seriously. If the artcile take on this matter in rather goofy way, and lean more on the fanservice side than being it "hurting a whole industry", it'll gain more positive traction than this.

I agree, Senran Kagura's reach outside of Japan is so tiny it's barely worth mentioning.

There are much more damaging things out there to focus one's energies on than an obscure anime booby game.
 

Gestault

Member
Seriously?

I'm not saying I agree with the person you responded to, particularly since I'm someone who'll probably end up buying this game, but let me explain as best I can. I want to because I think laughing and asking if someone's being serious is pretending there's no rational basis for it, and I don't agree with that.

Someone who surrounds themselves with fantasy depictions of hyper-sexualized, almost inhuman-looking characters with equally bizarre and artificial behaviors is very easy to misunderstand from the outside. Depending on your age, these characters can look a little on the young-side, and nubility is played up to a deliberate level. So much effort is put into fan-servicy focuses that it's easy to make the case that it's at the expense of other elements. To many, that would appear to be a fantasy motivated by either (a) discomfort with normal people and interactions or (b) a wish that normal people and interactions would resemble that bizarre fantasy. I get that. You might notice that this description sounds a whole lot how someone might describe pornography. I think this stuff gets criticized more savagely than pornography by people I'd normally take seriously.

Just as we might enjoy any creative work for different reasons, people are within their rights to question our motivations for liking it. Chances are, a lot of the time they're completely wrong. Others, they may have a point. That's why we need to have this stuff out there: because the reactions and the conversations around it are what influences people over time.

To give an exaggerated example, if I saw someone's Livejournal series of fan-fic stories about the American South rising again and subjugating all blacks, I would think less of them. That's a fantasy at the expense of a group of people, which I think even conceptually is pretty monstrous. Re: the genre of titillating media we're talking about here, many people look at these sorts of depictions in games (and conversely, anime) and feel that it's a fantasy at the expense of women, because it diminishes them to a preposterous point of sexual objectification. This has varying degrees of accuracy, depending on the individual work.
 

docbon

Member
I'm not saying I agree with the person you responded to, particularly since I'm someone who'll probably end up buying this game, but let me explain as best I can. I want to because I think laughing and asking if someone's being serious is pretending there's no rational basis for it, and I don't agree with that.

Someone who surrounds themselves with fantasy depictions of hyper-sexualized, almost inhuman-looking characters with equally bizarre and artificial behaviors is very easy to misunderstand from the outside. Depending on your age, these characters can look a little on the young-side, and nubility is played up to a deliberate level. So much effort is put into fan-servicy focuses that it's easy to make the case that it's at the expense of other elements. To many, that would appear to be a fantasy motivated by either (a) discomfort with normal people and interactions or (b) a wish that normal people and interactions would resemble that bizarre fantasy. I get that. You might notice that this description sounds a whole lot how someone might describe pornography. I think this stuff gets criticized more savagely than pornography by people I'd normally take seriously.

Just as we might enjoy any creative work for different reasons, people are within their rights to question our motivations for liking it. Chances are, a lot of the time they're completely wrong. Others, they may have a point. That's why we need to have this stuff out there: because the reactions and the conversations around it are what influences people over time.

To give an exaggerated example, if I saw someone's Livejournal series of fan-fic stories about the American South rising again and subjugating all blacks, I would think less of them. That's a fantasy at the expense of a group of people, which I think even conceptually is pretty monstrous. Re: the genre of titillating media we're talking about here, many people look at these sorts of depictions in games (and conversely, anime) and feel that it's a fantasy at the expense of women, because it diminishes them to a preposterous point of sexual objectification. This has varying degrees of accuracy, depending on the individual work.

This is a pretty fair assessment.
 

DeaviL

Banned
So confirmation bias and no evidence.

I admitted to it's worthlessness in an argument, i'd like to keep the head you seem so keen to bite off.

It might be an unproven statement, but it's not an entirely useless observation (it echoes).
No, it isn't

More sad than creepy. Still an odd way of life nonetheless.

You know what's sad? dismissing a whole group because of a personally held bias.
 

EmiPrime

Member
game center cx is (sadly) even less than that in the west, to be honest

Ouch! :(

This kind of stereotyping is gross. People get called out on it when they do it for other groups, and you should too.

Ask young girls and women what they think of Akihabara and otaku culture, you'll hear the word "kimoi" (gross) crop up a lot. Weird creepy anime stuff is looked down on as much there as it is here.

Otaku aren't a protected group. If they don't want to seem creepy then maybe instead of doubling down on the oppai they should stop buying this stuff.
 

Tohsaka

Member
Ouch! :(



Ask young girls and women what they think of Akihabara and otaku culture, you'll hear the word "kimoi" (gross) crop up a lot. Weird creepy anime stuff is looked down on as much there as it is here.

Otaku aren't a protected group. If they don't want to seem creepy then maybe instead of doubling down on the oppai they should stop buying this stuff.

Yes, people should stop buying things they like so that you'll perceive them differently.
 

JC Lately

Member
The funny thing is that most people bothered by how women are portrayed (design-wise) in games, are men and not, well, women..

Well, yeah, of course.

The figure that is so thrown around these days is that 40-45% of so-called ‘gamers’ are female. If we accept this figure (and I have no reason to doubt it) then that means that 55-60% of gamers are male. We’re the majority. If we don’t talk about how to fix shit, who will?

It’s our house, dudes. And it’s a freaking mess.

Let’s clean it up.
 

gryz

Banned
Well, yeah, of course.

It’s our house, dudes. And it’s a freaking mess.

Let’s clean it up.

what does this even mean? are you arguing that certain types of games should be censored so that games as a whole appeal to everyone equally?
 

JC Lately

Member
what does this even mean? are you arguing that certain types of games should be censored so that games as a whole appeal to everyone equally?

The fact that this was the first conclusion you reached really says more about you than it does about me.
 
Well, yeah, of course.

The figure that is so thrown around these days is that 40-45% of so-called ‘gamers’ are female. If we accept this figure (and I have no reason to doubt it) then that means that 55-60% of gamers are male. We’re the majority. If we don’t talk about how to fix shit, who will?

It’s our house, dudes. And it’s a freaking mess.

Let’s clean it up.

What is there to clean in this case? If the industry is a house then games like Senran Kagura are the dirty mags you keep in a box under your bed. If the house was filled to the brim with dirty mags then there would be a problem.
 

Chopper

Member
Ouch! :(



Ask young girls and women what they think of Akihabara and otaku culture, you'll hear the word "kimoi" (gross) crop up a lot. Weird creepy anime stuff is looked down on as much there as it is here.

Otaku aren't a protected group. If they don't want to seem creepy then maybe instead of doubling down on the oppai they should stop buying this stuff.
Are you an expert in Japanese culture, by any chance?

But yeah. Don't judge groups of people by their possessions and social habits man.
 

bon

Member
Ouch! :(



Ask young girls and women what they think of Akihabara and otaku culture, you'll hear the word "kimoi" (gross) crop up a lot. Weird creepy anime stuff is looked down on as much there as it is here.

Otaku aren't a protected group. If they don't want to seem creepy then maybe instead of doubling down on the oppai they should stop buying this stuff.

A lot of people think a lot of types of people are "gross." That doesn't mean it's right or fair to look down on them and stereotype them.
 

Giolon

Member
Ouch! :(



Ask young girls and women what they think of Akihabara and otaku culture, you'll hear the word "kimoi" (gross) crop up a lot. Weird creepy anime stuff is looked down on as much there as it is here.

Otaku aren't a protected group. If they don't want to seem creepy then maybe instead of doubling down on the oppai they should stop buying this stuff.

Nobody said anything about a protected group? You're broadly characterizing all people who might want to play or even dare to enjoy a game like Senran Kagura with a singular negative stereotype, and you think that's ok?

There's a difference between saying "I think Senran Kagura and games like it are creepy," and saying, "I think that anyone who buys Senran Kagura is a basement dwelling, socially inept manchild."
 

meppi

Member
Mission accomplished ONM!

iQbj2RWQbUx8U.png
 

Shengar

Member
Well, yeah, of course.

The figure that is so thrown around these days is that 40-45% of so-called ‘gamers’ are female. If we accept this figure (and I have no reason to doubt it) then that means that 55-60% of gamers are male. We’re the majority. If we don’t talk about how to fix shit, who will?

It’s our house, dudes. And it’s a freaking mess.

Let’s clean it up.

What's to clean up? It's a niche game made by niche developer for niche audience. What happened to industry, they will exist regardless. If niche represent the majority, oh boy sure we're fucked.
 

JC Lately

Member
What is there to clean in this case? If the industry is a house then games like Senran Kagura are the dirty mags you keep in a box under your bed. If the house was filled to the brim with dirty mags then we would have some cleaning to do.

That’s just it though. The dirty magazines are everywhere. They’re the norm. Everywhere you go you’re stepping on Playboy, and Hustler and Penthouse, with barely a Time or hell even a Cosmo in sight.






I’m really starting to regret my ‘house’ metaphor now...
 
Ohh not this shit again. That's why I love gaming its so diverse . Why are people so infatuated with one particular art direction. I hate using this argument because its so painfully obvious but " no one is forcing anyone to buy these games" or agree with their art style". It's so annoying, I am for gun control, should I go on a crusade to prevent games with guns from being made because its harmful to society and in the process prevent people from having a choice to buy or not to buy these games.
 
Quick opinion.

The blogger need to get out of his home and look at society as a whole.
He'll see that most of his argument are false in context or true in only specific cases making his whole opinion piece void.

Senran kagura is a game , it succeed at what he does , and never goes beyond that. Trying to use the game as an escuse for his own agenda is as ridiculous as the morons complaining that you shouldn't be able to hunt wild animals in video games too ( rdr or GTA5 ). it's ridiculous , plain and simple.
 

GuardianE

Santa May Claus
That’s just it though. The dirty magazines are everywhere. They’re the norm. Everywhere you go you’re stepping on Playboy, and Hustler and Penthouse, with barely a Time or hell even a Cosmo in sight.

I’m really starting to regret my ‘house’ metaphor now...

I must be looking in the wrong places for reading material in my house.
 

Shengar

Member
That’s just it though. The dirty magazines are everywhere. They’re the norm. Everywhere you go you’re stepping on Playboy, and Hustler and Penthouse, with barely a Time or hell even a Cosmo in sight.

I’m really starting to regret my ‘house’ metaphor now...

Well, good luck replacing these guys magazine from Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler with Time! That'll make Playboy, Hustler, and Penthouse stop existing right?
 
Well, yeah, of course.

The figure that is so thrown around these days is that 40-45% of so-called ‘gamers’ are female. If we accept this figure (and I have no reason to doubt it) then that means that 55-60% of gamers are male. We’re the majority. If we don’t talk about how to fix shit, who will?

It’s our house, dudes. And it’s a freaking mess.

Let’s clean it up.

No it isn't. Not all games feature T&A, just like all movies and TV don't. Games are not (and never have been) a form of entertainment that is somehow exempt from human nature, or above titillating content. Your suggestion is especially silly considering the demographic that buys games, which is more focused to younger consumers compared to the wider demographic that consume movies and TV.
 

EmiPrime

Member
Nobody said anything about a protected group? You're broadly characterizing all people who might want to play or even dare to enjoy a game like Senran Kagura with a singular negative stereotype, and you think that's ok?

There's a difference between saying "I think Senran Kagura and games like it are creepy," and saying, "I think that anyone who buys Senran Kagura is a basement dwelling, socially inept manchild."

If it bothers you then try creating a society where games featuring young anime girls with massive boobs and gratuitous "upskirt" shots are not considered weird and creepy. Don't moan at me.

If someone doesn't want to seem creepy maybe not buying creepy things would be an idea.
 
busty, slim, attractive people - an almost impossible feat in real life

I hate to nitpick since this might be considered a bit of a derail, but I get real tired of hearing how impossible and unrealistic some subset of human beings are. "Real" women come in all shapes and sizes. Body shaming isn't right even if there was only one busty, slim, attractive woman on Earth.

I mean, yeah, I know how exaggerated the actual subjects of this discussion are, but still.
 
Seems to me that the best way to get more games with healthier female roles would be to promote games that you find do that well or speak positively about the advantages of doing so/supporting new games that do, etc.

Assuming one actually cares about change and is actually attempting to persuade others, I'd think that they would choose their language more carefully than the author of the article in the OP. The only thing notable in that article is the hyperbole and that the author most likely felt good scratching that self-righteous itch without care for whether he actually presented a good argument aimed towards actually persuading people or getting them to see another viewpoint.

When I see others throwing around insults it's clear that they are more concerned with making themselves feel good than anything else, therefore I find it more or less impossible to take anything they say seriously since they've displayed clear disinterest in discussing the topic sensibly.
 

bon

Member
You know what the biggest problem with Senran Kagura is?

It's not a good game.

It's actually pretty fun if you're into beat 'em ups. There's decent room for variation in combos and the characters have pretty diverse play styles.
 
Nobody said anything about a protected group? You're broadly characterizing all people who might want to play or even dare to enjoy a game like Senran Kagura with a singular negative stereotype, and you think that's ok?

There's a difference between saying "I think Senran Kagura and games like it are creepy," and saying, "I think that anyone who buys Senran Kagura is a basement dwelling, socially inept manchild."

Yeah, there is. It's just a negligible, almost insubstantial factor in the post you're replying to. "Lie with dogs, get up with fleas", as the saying goes. No difference between an obsessive player, an ironic player and a player who's just in it for kicks when they're all fucking up (i.e. buying this game, apparently).
 

RE_Player

Member
It's a free market. In my opinion you can voice your displeasure of a game all you want but actively trying to discourage sales seems so petty and childish.
 
Top Bottom