I knew GAF is terrible at reading, but this is just beyond ridiculous.
From the SECOND paragraph in the article linked...
It couldn't be more clear it's a timed exclusive. He says it plain as day that the deal has a duration. There is no way he can make it more clear than that.
If you stop raging and whining you could have caught that easily.
This pretty much makes it a MS IP if this is the equivalent of DR3. Like I said in the other topc...
If MS is jumping in bed with the publisher, much like DR3, this is practically a MS IP from here on out, unless SE is going to try multiplat, console exclusive, multiplat. Welp, this move is bigger then I thought if this is true, now MS needs to hope it moves consoles as well as SE. Tomb Raider being bought for a console leader... I guess we shall see how many units this game moves.
yes timed exclusive but most definitely never coming to ps4
The brigthside of this shitstorm, those resources may help make a better Tomb Raider.
Not that I doubt Kagari, just curious. Kagari always seems to know what's up with SE. Why/how?
So, MS is helping to fund the game and Phil doesn't know what SE is going to do with TR after the deal is up, but they are free to put it on other platforms because they don't own the IP. Looks like we'll need SE to tell us what other platforms it will be on, which makes sense because MS doesn't own the IP. Just have to wait for SE to comment on it, and it could be awhile before we get a straight answer.
So Spencer is throwing CD and SE under the bus and saying they're in trouble and that CD is incompetent enough that they need MS's help? Hope the cash is worth it.
Ok chief.
See, the only way that I can see this deal resulting in a favorable higher revenue report that quarter would be if MS reduced the royalty fee on each copy sold on the Xbox enough so that it would be more than the combined total of all the money they would have made on five platforms (one of which is an open platform). Microsoft paying for part of development would definitely decrease loss resulting in higher net revenue, but that's over a period of time, and its effects would be less noticeable. Seriously, can't wait for the next Square Enix shareholder meeting and for their investors to grill them about this deal.I'm aware but maybe they think this MS deal will make them more money than the traditional method.
SmhYep, that's all this guy is. He's just another talking head who dances around shit with doublespeak and misdirection. I'm tired of this shit. If he wanted to purposely lose another potential customer then being Don Mattrick 2.0 was a great way to do it.
So Spencer is throwing CD and SE under the bus and saying they're in trouble and that CD is incompetent enough that they need MS's help? Hope the cash is worth it. I'm never giving either any of my money ever again since they continue to go along with this shameless obfuscation.
You're missing the point, he is giving you examples of similar deals, those games went to PC... Not ps4 (or wii u)I knew GAF is terrible at reading, but this is just beyond ridiculous.
From the SECOND paragraph in the article linked...
It couldn't be more clear it's a timed exclusive. He says it plain as day that the deal has a duration. There is no way he can make it more clear than that.
If you stop raging and whining you could have caught that easily.
yes timed exclusive but most definitely never coming to ps4
....yet.You're missing the point, he is giving you examples of similar deals, those games went to PC... Not ps4 (or wii u)
I had a random (and perhaps unimportant) thought... Didn't Sony pay for Tomb Raider II exclusivity back in the day so that it didn't also come out for Saturn/N64?
Do you understand what nda's are? Big deals like this are nda'ed to hell...he probably can't say anymore. This is how everything works in business especially around valuable ipYep, that's all this guy is. He's just another talking head who dances around shit with doublespeak and misdirection. I'm tired of this shit. If he wanted to purposely lose another potential customer then being Don Mattrick 2.0 was a great way to do it.
yes timed exclusive but most definitely never coming to ps4
Spencer is just as confusing as Mattrick was.. and honestly I'm pretty shocked by this.
better be fully exclusive
Kagari has posted several times in this thread.
Microsoft seems to want to do absolutely everything possible to obfuscate the issue further to make it seem like it won't come to Playstation. All this does is open then up to more criticism and ridicule because nobody is going to be picking up an Xbox One to play Tomb Raider.
They need help publishing a game that did like 4 million and still didn't break even. I'd imagine that rotr will cost at least as much to make.
Is it so difficult to just answer the question? Doesn't this actually hurt them more than avoiding it?
In deals like this, most of the money goes toward marketing/licensing deals.
I didn't realize SE needed help funding a sequel of a game that just pushed 7 million units
So, MS is helping to fund the game and Phil doesn't know what SE is going to do with TR after the deal is up, but they are free to put it on other platforms because they don't own the IP. Looks like we'll need SE to tell us what other platforms it will be on, which makes sense because MS doesn't own the IP. Just have to wait for SE to comment on it, and it could be awhile before we get a straight answer.
I knew GAF is terrible at reading, but this is just beyond ridiculous.
From the SECOND paragraph in the article linked...
It couldn't be more clear it's a timed exclusive. He says it plain as day that the deal has a duration. There is no way he can make it more clear than that.
If you stop raging and whining you could have caught that easily.