Not sure why I came here thinking there'd be some details included in the OP. Bad me for expecting just a tiny bit of effort.
it's cause there is NO information really
Not sure why I came here thinking there'd be some details included in the OP. Bad me for expecting just a tiny bit of effort.
Not sure why I came here thinking there'd be some details included in the OP. Bad me for expecting just a tiny bit of effort.
Those are the details.
Not sure why I came here thinking there'd be some details included in the OP. Bad me for expecting just a tiny bit of effort.
Nintendo fans idea of what constitutes a major release is dramatically lower than anyone else. I would assume you'd call Arms a major release? Let's see how that does.There's a major release coming out every month for the Switch from now till holiday, the System has much better marketing and communication than its predecessor, Its sold out all over the world. And you saying they've learned nothing?
You don't sell 2.7 million in less than a month by not learning from your mistakes, Nintendo has to be doing something right.
I wonder what this means for VGC Tournaments as in there is definitely no Switch version.
You mean what Pokémon bank is for?
If that was the case. why not just do cross platform multiplayer? Capcom is doing it with MonHun and that's a way more complicated online system than Pokemon is.
Like, I understand GF comes late to systems, and that's fine, but not splitting the userbase seems like a 'problem' with solutions.
Yeah.
When a new platform is released, as a motivation to push more sales, you need to release games for it and let the past behind.
Given the "install base" logic, every Nintendo game should be released on 3DS.
I think it's time for Pokemon to move on to the next platform. I would have liked to see it happening now...
But we will see. If Eurogamer is right, we may se a port later; but I don't know anymore.
coulda put the trailer and the new forms thoit's cause there is NO information really
Wow, I really don't understand Nintendo. Sure, they probably wouldn't made as much money with Pokemon Stars due to the install base of the Switch, but honestly: they already got tons of money out of the 3DS version of Sun and Moon, so they should have regarded Pokemon Stars as an investment to push the Switch and attract new people to their system.
That would still be an unprecedented move.
Nintendo fans idea of what constitutes a major release is dramatically lower than anyone else. I would assume you'd call Arms a major release? Let's see how that does.
What exactly do you think Nintendo has learned out of interest?
This seems more like a third version rather than a sequel. So I very much doubt the story will be entirely new.If it's like B2/W2. you'll get the world of SM with some bonus items, some minor tweaks here and there and a whole new story. B2W2 also were partly designed so that people could buy the sequel to their version and get a good amount of the exclusive stuff they missed from the other version of the first game.
I'm guessing this will split the user base? Sun/moon won't be compatible (battles trade) with us/um. Dumb if true.
Nintendo fans idea of what constitutes a major release is dramatically lower than anyone else. I would assume you'd call Arms a major release? Let's see how that does.
What exactly do you think Nintendo has learned out of interest?
Where did they say that?
Where did they say that?
Install base of 65+ million vs an install base of ~3 million.
Game Freak makes prudent business decisions.
Maybe next year once Switch has a larger install base.
I'm guessing this will split the user base? Sun/moon won't be compatible (battles trade) with us/um. Dumb if true.
I don't get it.
Nintendo clearly states "we will continue supporting 3DS through 2017 and beyond"
Nintendo clearly states "we will treat Switch as a successor to WiiU not the 3DS"
but people prefer to trust leakers or to ignore what they say.
why? Neogaf, why do you set yourselves up for disappointment so hard?
The main difference here is that unlike every single previous Nintendo handheld the Switch has no backwards compatibility. Pokemon's tradition of taking its sweet time moving up to the next generation made sense when the new hardware could play the new release anyway, but when your new platform has no BC and you're in a world where most major releases during a generational transition are cross-gen people are going to be a little harder on the decision to continue to release main-line games of major franchises as last-gen exclusives.
Nintendo fans idea of what constitutes a major release is dramatically lower than anyone else. I would assume you'd call Arms a major release? Let's see how that does.
What exactly do you think Nintendo has learned out of interest?
many sins would be forgiven if they just righted this one wrongHope they finally give Flygon Mega treatment...
Oh yeah. I got caught up in all of the hype, I forgot they mentioned new Pokémon.X Y didn't work with ORAS. It looks like they are adding forms and new items. I don't expect them to update sm.
Nintendo fans idea of what constitutes a major release is dramatically lower than anyone else. I would assume you'd call Arms a major release? Let's see how that does.
What exactly do you think Nintendo has learned out of interest?
Do we think we'll get more details during the Treehouse livestream at E3?
🤔🤔🤔What a bunch of clowns dude, 65 mil? If they had just launched it on the Wii and DS think of the gangbusters they would have made. What a poor business decision smh.
you know that there is about 300/802 pokemon in sun and moon, expect at least half of the ones missing in these new titles!What's the difference between this and the original?
I already own Moon, is this worth it for someone like me?
Did people really expect the first "real" Pokemon game on the Switch to be a port?
Why would you even want that really...it just be held back by the 3DS anyway.
Pokémon Ultra Sun and Pokémon Ultra Moon have been powered up with new additions to the story and features from Pokémon Sun and Pokémon Moon.
I don't get it.
Nintendo clearly states "we will continue supporting 3DS through 2017 and beyond"
Nintendo clearly states "we will treat Switch as a successor to WiiU not the 3DS"
but people prefer to trust leakers or to ignore what they say.
why? Neogaf, why do you set yourselves up for disappointment so hard?
LOL there goes any possible interest I could have had in these games.On the press release and the Japanese website it states
Don't get too excited. These are not sequels, they are basically a Pokemon Emerald style game, but this time there are two of them because money.
On the press release and the official website it states
Don't get too excited. These are not sequels, they are basically a Pokemon Emerald style game, but this time there are two of them because money.
Expect this.Hmmm. I'll buy it but that's super duper lame. Those new features better be Emerald tier for me to spend any time with the game. Otherwise I'll play through the campaign go 'yeah alola is still neat' and be done.
On the press release and the official website it states
Don't get too excited. These are not sequels, they are basically a Pokemon Emerald style game, but this time there are two of them because money.
On the press release and the official website it states
Don't get too excited. These are not sequels, they are basically a Pokemon Emerald style game, but this time there are two of them because money.