Spiegel said:
Call me crazy but isn't that exactly what Nintendo said they did for 3DS?
Spiegel said:
The 3D LCD is what's so special about the 3DS screen, duhH_Prestige said:I'm sure they're all good by LCD standards (though I'm not sure what's so special about the 3DS screen other than 3D), but OLED kicks the shit out of all of them. That is if you value picture quality.
Aren't their Galaxy phones incredibly powerful, OLED screen, and still relatively cheap?Durante said:I don't know about HP and Apple, but Samsung builds everything.
Dreamwriter said:The 3D LCD is what's so special about the 3DS screen, duhAnd while OLED is awesome in some ways (brightness/color), it tends to be worse than LCD in others (contrast). Regardless, my point was the devices mentioned in no way have "crappy" screens.
Yes, if $500+ is relative cheap for you.Yoboman said:Aren't their Galaxy phones incredibly powerful, OLED screen, and still relatively cheap?
No, Nintendo designed the 3DS the same way they always make their handhelds. Which involves working with first party developers working at Nintendo, but not third parties at all.Bizzyb said:Call me crazy but isn't that exactly what Nintendo said they did for 3DS?
Dreamwriter said:The 3D LCD is what's so special about the 3DS screen, duhAnd while OLED is awesome in some ways (brightness/color), it tends to be worse than LCD in others (contrast). Regardless, my point was the devices mentioned in no way have "crappy" screens.
Dreamwriter said:The 3D LCD is what's so special about the 3DS screen, duhAnd while OLED is awesome in some ways (brightness/color), it tends to be worse than LCD in others (contrast). Regardless, my point was the devices mentioned in no way have "crappy" screens.
It is. OLED has "infinite" contrast, since the black level is 0.TTP said:I though contrast was one of the major strength of the OLED tech?
Dreamwriter said:The 3D LCD is what's so special about the 3DS screen, duhAnd while OLED is awesome in some ways (brightness/color), it tends to be worse than LCD in others (contrast). Regardless, my point was the devices mentioned in no way have "crappy" screens.
Well the Galaxy Tab costs $200Lonely1 said:Yes, if $500+ is relative cheap for you.
Lonely1 said:If you are kidding yourself if you contend that Samsung, HP and Apple doens't have as good (or better) manufacturing infrastructure than SCEA.
Yoboman said:Well the Galaxy Tab costs $200
http://www.thegalaxytab.com/2010/11/04/samsung-galaxy-tab-costs-214-57-to-make-less-than-the-ipad/
So I'm not sure where you're getting that $500 figure from
We aren't talking about retail prices, they can obviously have quite significant marginsLonely1 said:From the real life (retail) price? Look at your own page:
Samsung Galaxy Tab on sale in Germany 799
Lonely1 said:Yes, if $500+ is relative cheap for you.
Then you obviously didn't read the article that i posted.Yoboman said:We aren't talking about retail prices, they can obviously have quite significant margins
zomgbbqftw said:OLED screens have a native contrast ratio of 2,000,000:1 compared to LCD native contrast of 1000:1 for better screens and dynamic 100,000:1 for locally dimmed LED backlit ones.
If anything it is the contrast that sets OLED and LCD apart. There are some problems of course, daylight viewing is pants, and when showing a pure white screen it will consume 2-3x more power than an equivalent LCD/LED screen.
I responded specifically to the Samsung prices.zomgbbqftw said:ZTE Blade. £99 unlocked, came with an AMOLED screen until they ran out due to the massive success of the device and switched to LCD.
Lonely1 said:Then you obviously didn't read the article that i posted.
Lonely1 said:I responded specifically to the Samsung prices.
And what is the manufacturing costs? (Don't cite a company whose business is entirely based on linking with Companies that claim they can build it cheaper than whatever the hardware they are analyzing was build for).Piggus said:Who cares what they sell the Galaxy at? The actual manufacturing cost is a million times more telling. Sony doesn't put a $400 premium on their game systems. They typically sell them at an initial LOSS.
To assume the NGP will be expensive based on the RETAIL price of current tablets and phones goes to show that people don't know a damn thing about how Sony runs their console business.
Your article has nothing to do with production prices, it really has no bearing on NGP. Tablets are quite clearly a lot cheaper to manufacture than what the RRP isLonely1 said:Then you obviously didn't read the article that i posted.
It has all to do with it, it's main point is that none is matching or undercutting the iPad because no competitor can. (with a similar quality product, not that $99 Arm 11 phone or that $300 Archos crap-Tablet)Yoboman said:Your article has nothing to do with production prices, it really has no bearing on NGP. Tablets are quite clearly a lot cheaper to manufacture than what the RRP is
Of course they aren't, because they don't have to. Tablets are percieved as a high-priced market, and these companies are capitalising on the profit margins they can make.... None of them are expecting to beat Apple in this marketLonely1 said:It has all to do with it, it's main point is that none is matching or undercutting the iPad because no competitor can. (with a similar quality product, not that $99 Arm 11 phone or that $300 Archos Tablet)
Well, there's the the Nook Color. It has a great IPS screen and 512MB ram, and a slightly slower OMAP SoC than what's in most tablets (about 1/6th of NGP in performance).Lonely1 said:It has all to do with it, it's main point is that none is matching or undercutting the iPad because no competitor can. (with a similar quality product, not that $99 Arm 11 phone or that $300 Archos crap-Tablet)
So, you are arguing that the article is wrong, then? (Not that it has nothing to do?).Yoboman said:Of course they aren't, because they don't have to. Tablets are percieved as a high-priced market, and these companies are capitalising on the profit margins they can make.... None of them are expecting to beat Apple in this market
zomgbbqftw said:ZTE Blade. £99 unlocked, came with an AMOLED screen until they ran out due to the massive success of the device and switched to LCD.
Yeah pretty much.Lonely1 said:So, you are arguing that the article is wrong, then? (Not that it has nothing to do?).
Is quite bellow 1/6 of the NGP performance. The TI SoC uses the old SGX 530 (at 45 NM), with is about 50% slower than the 535, with is two times slower than the 540, wich is 50% slower than a single core 543. SO, up to 1/18 in GPU power?Durante said:Well, there's the the Nook Color. It has a great IPS screen and 512MB ram, and a slightly slower OMAP SoC than what's in most tablets (about 1/6th of NGP in performance).
I's a good comparison since the business model is quite similar to NGP, except with ebooks instead of games. It retails for $250.
I was talking about CPU performance. Yes, GPU is a larger gap. Still, it's maybe the most comparable device in terms of hardware and business model that is available right now.Lonely1 said:Is quite bellow 1/6 of the NGP performance. The TI SoC uses the old SGX 530 (at 45 NM), with is about 50% slower than the 535, with is two times slower than the 540, wich is 50% slower than a single core 543. SO, up to 1/18 in GPU power?![]()
No. I'm not saying that the NGP is going to be $500+, but I do think that people are underestimating the building costs of this devices.Piggus said:Honestly who gives a dick. When the price is announced, it will speak for itself. It will also shut those up who think Sony has to price it the same as a modern tablet.
Lonely1 said:Is quite bellow 1/6 of the NGP performance. The TI SoC uses the old SGX 530 (at 45 NM), with is about 50% slower than the 535, with is two times slower than the 540, wich is 50% slower than a single core 543. SO, up to 1/18 in GPU power?![]()
Lonely1 said:Why exactly is "totally unrelated"?
People here argue that "the iPhone 4 is only $200 to build! So the NGP can't be much more!".
Stephen Colbert said:I don't think it's out of the question that Sony could launch the PSP2 at $299 this Christmas, and lower the retail price of the PSP2 to $199 sometime late 2012 or early 2013, if the market dictates.
H_Prestige said:So you think NGP is bad hardware design?
charlequin said:No, that's definitely entirely plausible.
Stephen Colbert said:I don't the NGP is overengineered. But I do think it looks ugly and it certainly isn't something I would want to be seen in public with.
Here's hoping that whenever Sony switches over 22nm, they can make the NGP look something like this...
![]()
or this...
![]()
And while we're at it, I would like the next iteration of the Xperia Play to be able to play all NGP games that don't neccesitate the use of the touchpad for controls. It should be doable if they stick a quad core A9 and the SGX543MP4 in the Xperia Play 2.
Stephen Colbert said:And while we're at it, I would like the next iteration of the Xperia Play to be able to play all NGP games that don't neccesitate the use of the touchpad for controls. It should be doable if they stick a quad core A9 and the SGX543MP4 in the Xperia Play 2.
Wasn't there a rumor that the NGP might be able to emulate PS2 games?legacyzero said:If only I could have a PS2 library on NGP, I would buy this thing THREE times if it made Sony happy.
I know, I know. "If you wanna play PS2 games...bla bla bla"
I work at a boring call center and I cant very well take a PS2 to my desk lol.
Imagine games like FF 10-12, all the Metal Gears, DMC's, and Ace Combats in the palm of your had. Hell, I'd buy it just for that.
-Winnie- said:The current design looks fine, and is probably great to hold, but I'd want a portable to be more... portable. True, you can chuck it in a bag, but it'd be so much more convenient if it was PSPgo size.
legacyzero said:If only I could have a PS2 library on NGP, I would buy this thing THREE times if it made Sony happy.
I know, I know. "If you wanna play PS2 games...bla bla bla"
I work at a boring call center and I cant very well take a PS2 to my desk lol.
Imagine games like FF 10-12, all the Metal Gears, DMC's, and Ace Combats in the palm of your had. Hell, I'd buy it just for that.
Noshino said:Not gonna happen.
It would make the NGP more or less pointless.
And please, no slider design. I feel like I'd snap that shit in half, and it looks uncomfortable as hell.KAL2006 said:I choose more comfortable to hold and huge screen over uncomfortable to hold, smaller screen and less control options.
Skip DMC3 unless ur a glutton for punishment LOL.KAL2006 said:That would be great, for some reason I just prefer playing old console games on a handheld. Old console games look terrible on my HDTV. That is why I love playing emulators and PS1 games on the PSP. If NGP could play PS2, games I'd get those games that I haven't played yet (Viewtiful Joe 2, Valkyrie Profile 2, Tales of the Abyss, DMC3 SE, Jak 1 and etc)
Eh, it seems like this will happen eventually. Same as the PSP.-Winnie- said:The current design looks fine, and is probably great to hold, but I'd want a portable to be more... portable. True, you can chuck it in a bag, but it'd be so much more convenient if it was PSPgo size.
-Winnie- said:The current design looks fine, and is probably great to hold, but I'd want a portable to be more... portable. True, you can chuck it in a bag, but it'd be so much more convenient if it was PSPgo size.
Stephen Colbert said:Not at all. The NGP would be the $250 dedicted handheld, with a touchscreen on the back for games like Little Deviants, and the Xperia Play 2 would be the $700 cellphone+handheld for richer people who don't mind signing a 2 year contract to get the device for $250. The Xperia Play 2 would be the actual high margin device for Sony. They would both get $300+ for every device sold and $15+ for every NGP game sold for it. There's no downside to Sony. Not making the Xperia Play 2 compatible with NGP games and cartrages would basically be Sony leaving money on the table.
Making the NGP a cellphone would sell it to a lot more people. Lots of people, even gamers, don't like the idea of carrying two different devices with them at all times. They like having one pocketable device that they can do everything on, browse the web, play games, take pictures, and make phone calls. That's a big part of the reason why smartphones in general gaming on smartphones in particulary so rapidly became a multibillion dollar industry, but none of the games coming out for the Xperia Play have the kind of appeal that Uncharted and Call of Duty have.
Besides, the current Xperia Play is ruined by the touchpanel instead of dual analog nubs. Gamers dislike smartphone gaming precisely BECAUSE it feels obnoxious to use touch inputs to control movement and aim. Fingers need to actually interact with the controls and get some feedback in return imo. I think Sony could market and sell a boatload of Xperia Play 2s and a tons of NGP games, possibly even outpace iPhone sales on a week to week basis, if it the Xperia Play 2 could play NGP games and had dual analog nubs.