It's like, if I am not a sneaker wearer.. and I review the latest Jay's? You would think my opinion is wack, right?
Good thing I DO WEAR JAYS YOOOO HOHOHOHOHOHOHOH
.And we're not asking for mastery here, just someone who can move and shoot. The real issue is that the video tells me nothing of how the game plays, because the person holding the controller can't execute simple actions. That's not really a fair review.
A disclaimer would be nice, but to be fair we don't get disclaimers about reviewers from pros either, and pros may have a very different experience than the average buyer.
The feedback on this particular video has been heard loud and clear. We're working on additional videos, a review and preview coverage for Doom.
But just to be clear, my clarification was meant to address that this video was somehow tied to the game's review, when it is not.
So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
Psh, my car analogy is like a trillion times betterer.
I wouldn't want the guys from Car and Driver magazine reviewing a car and they couldnt push it to it's limits around the track without fucking up. Those guys record times. Times which need to be accurate.
This dude cant even shoot in the same direction of the monster? Oh hell naw.
Just keep doubling down with the 'no experience playing games required to be a professional game reviewer.' It makes a lot of sense. I can't believe people are actually making this argument. It's like you're arguing just to argue or something.
Yeah, don't review a game if you can't perform the simplest of actions in it.So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
Just keep doubling down with the 'no experience playing games required to be a professional game reviewer.' It makes a lot of sense. I can't believe people are actually making this argument. It's like you're arguing just to argue or something.
So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
Perfectlmao, no, it's nothing like that at all
We're not talking about likes or dislikes. We're talking about motor skills.
This isn't a guy who doesn't like Mexican food - this is a guy who drops it on the floor and tries to eat the contents using a pair of salad tongs.
Is that a valid way to eat? I mean, sure, who am I to judge? But do I want him reviewing how the food tastes?
Who in the world does thisIs this the only type of game and control method that exist? What if they exclusively play strategy or turn based games?
This is like New Yorkers flipping out at a food critic for eating pizza with a knife and fork.
Not "no experience playing games", obviously. But, yes, I frankly think the reactions from people on the Internet from various videos of the games press playing games over the years is completely out over the top.
If they only play strategy and turn based games then they shouldn't be reviewing a shooter.Is this the only type of game and control method that exist? What if they exclusively play strategy or turn based games?
This is like New Yorkers flipping out at a food critic for reviewing pizza while eating with a knife and fork.
Should there be a barrier to entry for skill on reviews? That's a question that I think can be answered by looking at subjectivity. Is there a direct correlation between higher skill level and understanding of a game at a mechanical level? I think so. What about story? Someone's experience in a game can easily be skewed by the perceived challenge and if they actually like to be challenged. I remember watching an IGN video someone linked me and one of their reviewers had quit Fallout 4 on normal after only a small portion of the game because he thought it was too hard. That reflected in his discussions of the game thereafter and potentially changed his views on similar games in the future. I don't think someone should have to be like me to review a game (Normally highest difficulties/greatest challenges I can get) but personally I feel they should certainly be more competent than a casual gamer for me to take them seriously. However, what I want out of a game/review is different from what others want so the reviews I follow are not generally "casual". Every review is highly subjective so there is value in a review from someone who isn't a very skilled gamer, but it should reflect that in the article. Someone who really isn't much of a gamer, or not very skilled who got into video game journalism should tell us that is the lense they look at the game through because it's pertinent to the review of the game.
TLDR: no there's shouldn't be a skill cap on reviews because of their subjective nature. There is value in casual reviews. However, reviewers should make clear the difficulty on which they played and their experience with similar titles as they have a bearing on a review.
If you cant control a game, you shouldnt need to hear someone elses' opinion on how they can't control it. What can you possibly take from that kind of review?
![]()
Why, yes.
That may very well be true.
But the job of a review, any review really, is to give someone with a passing interest in the subject an idea of what to expect. To use the car analogy again, I wouldn't really take the opinion of someone who doesn't drive cars, or have a deep knowledge or experience with cars, on a particular vehicle. Someone is of course free to review whatever they like, but when someone asks 'Umm... Why should I take your review seriously if you're not intimately aware of the subject matter?'
I agree.
It comes off as very entitled to say that people with less gaming experience should not be allowed to review games or should be shamed for even trying. There are a ton of reviews/impressions from skilled players for me, no reason for there not to be some for the people just getting into the genre for the first time.
They play games as well as they write articles.
![]()
![]()
Why, yes.
I don't really see the harm.Just keep doubling down with the 'no experience playing games required to be a professional game reviewer.' It makes a lot of sense. I can't believe people are actually making this argument. It's like you're arguing just to argue or something.
Who in the world does this
WHAT HELL IS THIS
Who in the world does this
I can't believe ppl are defending this lmao. Fuck this industry.
Dyed green.i'm dying
You must be in Nürburg, cause you're in the Green Hell.WHAT HELL IS THIS
You monster*raises hand*
Looks like 99% of people I see playing games though.
That has to be a joke right?
How was this person controlling the game?
So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
Not "no experience playing games", obviously. But, yes, I frankly think the reactions from people on the Internet from various videos of the games press playing games over the years is completely out over the top.
![]()
Why, yes.
WHAT HELL IS THIS
The nerds on here man I swear. Basically every game needs to have some superfan reviewing it who's familiar with the mythos, an expert in the gameplay, and has played through New Game+++++ for at least 300 hours. Even though all those people for whom those things are important are such uberfans that they couldn't give a shit about reviews other than to criticize them.
In this particular case, it seems to be a game focused entirely on shooty bang-bang so I don't need a review to tell me it's not for me.