YuriLowell
Member
I'm not following. Why is this a problem?
Its not a problem.
I'm not following. Why is this a problem?
I think just like some of the posters here said, it would be considerably lower. I think unless the game has top tier TLOU level writing, cinematic focused titles are not received as favorably as back in the day.
U2 and MW2 certainly influenced a generation of games that flooded the market try to imitate the success. Even the successors to those games were scrutinized.
I believe some GAFers have stated that playing it on Hard resulted in a playtime twice as long (10-14 hrs), so there's that.
The biggest question I have right now is whether this thread will dethrone the Uncharted 3 thread for the title of most infamous review thread of all time.
The uncharted one is as EQUALLY SILLY.Not this one?
Gamespot Review - Zelda: Twilight Princess.
The fallout from that one review sent repercussions throughout the internet lol.
Exactly six years ago*, GameSpot reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.
75 seems a little high
I'm really hoping if this thread can't manage a discussion, maybe the OT will be filled with some discussion of people's impressions of the game, but I have this feeling the OT will be filled with people trying to share their YouTube "impressions."
Yeah, but U1 & U2 seem to have lead that charge, in an alternate universe where Uncharted was a new IP I think there'd be a lot less cinematic games of that sort as well. Certainly wouldn't be Tomb Raider 2013. This game feels like it takes a lot from uncharted (presentation more than setting/gameplay) as well
Not this one?
Gamespot Review - Zelda: Twilight Princess.
The fallout from that one review sent repercussions throughout the internet lol.
Exactly six years ago*, GameSpot reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.
They may have just played the game very, very slowly.How is that even possible
This is what I'm thinking will happen, too. Just too much out there right now for it to get all 9s and 10s. Mostly 8s, some 7s, less 9s and probably zero 10s.I'm expecting low to mid 70s metacritic, 5/10 from polygon and an entertaining thread
Hmm whats your opinion Gaf have the $150 premium edition preordered and im not rich what say you yae or nay?
I figured the sculpture and book with blood vile was cool however id hoped the game would help justify the cost a bit.However now it looks like maybe rental/used buy later especially cause single player only so would love to hear opinions.
If nay maybe ill give someone here a shot at it before returning it.
A fucking rush job to get the review out, pathetic.
JeuxVideo said:Duration :
Almost 7 hours, without running, which is a bit short (knowing that cinematics is half the duration..).
Agreed with the bold for sure!Well, I'll definitely stop talking about the potential nature of the thread, just commenting on how it seems like people want it to go into crazy town. That can be amusing, sure, but I'm interested in the game so I hate seeing every thread like this turn into a circus. Anyway, eager to see more reviews.
This is what I'm thinking will happen, too. Just too much out there right now for it to get all 9s and 10s. Mostly 8s, some 7s, less 9s and probably zero 10s.
Not bad for the first in a franchise but hopefully they get the message and address shortcomings in the inevitable sequel.
That stuff is never worth it, in hindsight. Especially for $150. Might even affect your opinion of the game to be more positive than an year later because of sunk cost fallacy. If you're not rich and don't have the disposable money to throw around, maybe just get the game. I'm sure the toy will be sold later separately.
I wonder why RAD didn't slap together some type of horde most for those that absolutely need an online mode.
Given that the game had already been delayed once, they probably had other priorities.I wonder why RAD didn't slap together some type of horde most for those that absolutely need an online mode.
Looking back at it now, I probably would have rated it lower, personally.Not this one?
Gamespot Review - Zelda: Twilight Princess.
The fallout from that one review sent repercussions throughout the internet lol.
Exactly six years ago*, GameSpot reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.
They did not have the man power to do so.
In terms of Metacritic I think it'll do better than Killzone Shadow Fall (73) but worse than Infamous Second Son (80).
Hey now!!!
They didn't run....see...
In terms of Metacritic I think it'll do better than Killzone Shadow Fall (73) but worse than Infamous Second Son (80).
Oh my. They lost it.Not this one?
Gamespot Review - Zelda: Twilight Princess.
The fallout from that one review sent repercussions throughout the internet lol.
Exactly six years ago*, GameSpot reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.
I hope this game scores well just so some people will look foolish for dismissing it without playing.
70-75 Metacritic + Thread exploding
Okay this wins...... some of the comments.
The French just hate American video games, that's why they didn't give a 10/10.
Am I doing this right?
I agree. I'm thinking 78.In terms of Metacritic I think it'll do better than Killzone Shadow Fall (73) but worse than Infamous Second Son (80).
I wonder why RAD didn't slap together some type of horde most for those that absolutely need an online mode.
Not this one?
Gamespot Review - Zelda: Twilight Princess.
The fallout from that one review sent repercussions throughout the internet lol.
Exactly six years ago*, GameSpot reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.
should be noted they played on easy
Am I the only one who's actually interested in the reviews, and not just GAF's reaction to the reviews?
Pathetic. You can't judge a game's gameplay mechanics by playing on easy.