Angry Grimace said:Is there a reason they don't just keep the internal shape and put rubber over the stupid toes ?
What magical material would hold a shape, not add bulk, and handle wear and tear?
Angry Grimace said:Is there a reason they don't just keep the internal shape and put rubber over the stupid toes ?
In addition to what SnakeXs said, said external casing would still have to be flexible enough to allow the toes to spread out, or else you've eliminated a key benefit of the Vibrams.Angry Grimace said:Is there a reason they don't just keep the internal shape and put rubber over the stupid toes ?
Agreed. If there were only a shoe that closely wrapped the foot in some protective, but minimalistic material that could protect them from concrete metal and wood while still allowing our evolutionary gait to take place.Casp0r said:Humans are designed to walk on soft earth ... not concrete, metal and wood.
Hence I'll keep my nice rubber air cushioned shoes thanks.
But but but that would look so stupid, how could you go out in public like that? couldn't they make it so they were just like one big compartment for all of your fingers instead?????OuterWorldVoice said:They should make these shoes, but for your hands. Imagine having your hands protected from the cold and the elements while you were working, or climbing, or whatever. Would be amazing.
OuterWorldVoice said:They should make these shoes, but for your hands. Imagine having your hands protected from the cold and the elements while you were working, or climbing, or whatever. Would be amazing.
You sarcasm detector must be broken.weepy said:..umm...gloves?
nothing gets past you does itweepy said:..umm...gloves?
What about rock? There's a tribe in South America that runs hundreds of miles over mountains with thin sandals on.Casp0r said:Humans are designed to walk on soft earth ... not concrete, metal and wood.
Hence I'll keep my nice rubber air cushioned shoes thanks.
Foot mittens!elrechazao said:But but but that would look so stupid, how could you go out in public like that? couldn't they make it so they were just like one big compartment for all of your fingers instead?????
Good for him that he doesn't seem to care what judgmental people think. If he's wearing them, he is also probably quite aware that he is allegedly overweight, and is doing something about it!Arcipello said:someone at my work wears these......hes already short and fat so wearing Hobbit feet really didnt help his appearance :-/
Ill Saint said:Good for him that he doesn't seem to care what judgmental people think. If he's wearing them, he is also probably quite aware that he is allegedly overweight, and is doing something about it!
No, but people who wear Five Fingers are generally active or health-oriented in some way. These aren't shoes you just go out on a whim and buy because you saw them at the store think they look interesting, unless you want to mess your feet and legs up.Arcipello said:hang on.... shoes are not a substitute for a healthy diet and regular exercise.
Unless they're those awesome sketchers that make your butt sculpted like a supermodel's.Arcipello said:hang on.... shoes are not a substitute for a healthy diet and regular exercise.
Arcipello said:hang on.... shoes are not a substitute for a healthy diet and regular exercise.
Highly recommend the Trek. They're rugged and hold up extremely well for any sort of serious hiking, bush-bashing or outdoor activity. The Treksport is great, too, but for lighter trail walking or running. I found the Trek to fit larger than the other models, so be careful. You might not necessarily have to size up even when wearing Injinji socks. Best to try in store.Dan said:Pretty sure I'm going to buy a pair, just can't decide which one. I don't do a whole lot of running anymore but might pick back up with these. Either way, I'd want them to be good for hiking and exploring. Seems like the KSO, Treksport and KSO Trek are what I should be looking at. Are the only real big differences just material and durability (with the order used from least durable to strongest)? I like the look of the KSO Trek a lot less, but I'm leaning that way since it doesn't have the mesh and that might be best for when I go off-trail.
I'm also kinda concerned whether they'll work for me without the Injini socks, since my feet have a definite tendency to sweat. I'll probably just size up to accommodate for always wearing socks.
Awesome. I definitely plan to try it on in the store. Hopefully I'll be successful in finding the style and size I need tomorrow.Ill Saint said:Highly recommend the Trek. They're rugged and hold up extremely well for any sort of serious hiking, bush-bashing or outdoor activity. The Treksport is great, too, but for lighter trail walking or running. I found the Trek to fit larger than the other models, so be careful. You might not necessarily have to size up even when wearing Injinji socks. Best to try in store.
These look pretty awesome and the reviews on amazon from other owners of Vibrams gives me hope.lunchtoast said:Got these Merrell Trail Glove shoes delivered last Friday. I ordered my usual shoe size and they fit pretty good. Saturday I went out for the day wearing them and they were very comfortable. We also pulled over on the PCH 1 and did a little climbing. I could feel the rocks and everything. Sunday I did a 10 minute warmup run at the gym and the bottom of my calves started to get sore (and still are, I never run for more than 20 minutes though). The quality is good, and they wash easily. The front is wide and I had good toe room. The only problems is that these are more expensive than VFF. They retail for about 110. I looked at other shoes in this area, but these were the most available, and also had my shoe size (14). If you're willing to spend the extra money, and VFF aren't for you, I'd say it's worth it, and I've heard nothing but good things about Merrell.
I'd try to try on both the KSO and Komodos. A lot of people like the KSO since they're the most durable/ most protective, but I love my Komodos since they strike a balance between the thicker padding of the KSO and the thinner shoes.Dan said:Pretty sure I'm going to buy a pair, just can't decide which one. I don't do a whole lot of running anymore but might pick back up with these. Either way, I'd want them to be good for hiking and exploring. Seems like the KSO, Treksport and KSO Trek are what I should be looking at. Are the only real big differences just material and durability (with the order used from least durable to strongest)? I like the look of the KSO Trek a lot less, but I'm leaning that way since it doesn't have the mesh and that might be best for when I go off-trail.
I'm also kinda concerned whether they'll work for me without the Injini socks, since my feet have a definite tendency to sweat. I'll probably just size up to accommodate for always wearing socks.
Bikila / Bikila LS are the serious runners models. Sprint is fine if you prefer a thinner sole and more ground feedback. You could also look at the KomodoSport, which is great if you want a more general sports shoe that you can also run in.Dechaios said:DAMNIT! My dogs got a hold of my pair and tore up one of the shoes. Bleh.... Well, I ordered them a couple years ago. Probably time for a new pair anyways... I generally run on asphalt(usually on the road at my local cemetary). Since there are a couple new models, which would you guys say would be best for my needs? SPRINT maybe?
Thanks for the suggestion! I just traded in 100 bucks worth of stuff for amazon credit so I know what that's going towards now.Ill Saint said:Bikila / Bikila LS are the serious runners models. Sprint is fine if you prefer a thinner sole and more ground feedback. You could also look at the KomodoSport, which is great if you want a more general sports shoe that you can also run in.
Those fit me very oddly; very tight on the arch area of my foot, but too loose in the toes. The Minimus Trails mentioned above fit me much better.SolarPowered said:These look pretty awesome and the reviews on amazon from other owners of Vibrams gives me hope.
I may have to set some money aside for less conspicuous running shoes and these look like they fit the bill.
It sounds very unusual that the Trek was causing you a lot of pain even when only sitting. If you're already using them for workouts or exercise, go easy so you don't injure yourself. Your feet and legs will need a good amount of time to get used to them.Chorazin said:Got home and put on the KSO Treks. Ouch! I was in pain hardcore, even when just sitting. The strap was pulling to tight to fit right and it was nothing like I experienced with the Bikilas. Put them on, no problem, pain's gone. Huh. Could be the leather shrunk due to the humidity, in that case they'd be worthless to me most of the summer.
Saw that I had time to make it to the mall, so I went and tried on the Treksport. Bingo, no pain either, and they fit better. The leather material of the KSO Treks were messing with my feet, they didn't have the expandability I needed like the Bikila's did. Swapped them out and now I have happy feet in my Treksports! Glad I bought local for a change.
Ill Saint said:It sounds very unusual that the Trek was causing you a lot of pain even when only sitting. If you're already using them for workouts or exercise, go easy so you don't injure yourself. Your feet and legs will need a good amount of time to get used to them.
Personally, I wouldn't wear something with such little protection in a weight room, particularly on the toes; seeing a digit or two get popped off will do that to you.parrotbeak said:After at least a year of saying I'm gonna get one, I finally did. The guy at the store said he's been using them at the gym for years and if I'm just going to lift in them I probably don't need to go easy at first. Do you guys think it'll be fine for my first time wearing to do like 2 hours of compound lifts and some HIIT on the elliptical?
I walk around barefoot all the time, but not a whole lot of exercise. Once in a while I'll jog on the beach, but my calves burn out fast. I'm fine walking on the beach though.MjFrancis said:How often do you walk around barefoot? If you spend a good amount of time doing that already, the transition to Fivefinger shoes should be smoother. I don't know what the difference would be on the elliptical, but you should be set for your training. Maybe don't attempt any 1RM or 5RM movements for a few weeks while you get used to them.
If I drop a weight on my foot with a shoe on, I think I'm still gonna be fucked.Personally, I wouldn't wear something with such little protection in a weight room, particularly on the toes; seeing a digit or two get popped off will do that to you.
Ya, I think it's a little silly that gyms don't let you go barefoot. I can see not allowing it on machines, but with free weights your feet aren't likely to get caught in anything.MjFrancis said:That's how I look at it. I wear Chuck Taylor's or Feiyue's to the gym, and they offer scant more protection than the Fivefingers. I'm not rocking steel-toed boots like the bodybuilders in muscle magazines, lol.
parrotbeak said:Ya, I think it's a little silly that gyms don't let you go barefoot. I can see not allowing it on machines, but with free weights your feet aren't likely to get caught in anything.
But it's fine, I'd rather have these on to protect from cuts. Also I've tried the elliptical barefoot and was fine going slow but couldn't keep a good enough grip on the pedals to go fast.
MjFrancis said:Or at the very least you won't get blood all over the place. Or at least as much blood.
KSOBertramCooper said:I've been running six miles about four or five times per week, and I'd like to get some new running shoes. I'm seriously considering picking up a pair of these.
For that sort of distance, what would be the best type? I'm just running on sidewalks and stuff.
BertramCooper said:I've been running six miles about four or five times per week, and I'd like to get some new running shoes. I'm seriously considering picking up a pair of these.
For that sort of distance, what would be the best type? I'm just running on sidewalks and stuff.