Except the fact i call bullshit where i see it, unlike you.
You are calling yourself out all the time?
You two should get a room...I can film it and prepare a serenade.
Except the fact i call bullshit where i see it, unlike you.
You are calling yourself out all the time?
Lol I can't tell if sarcasm or not.
Man there is hardly any difference between them, don't care how many milliseconds of slow down a comparison video shows to show you the difference, there is hardly nothing between them in reality
Thats your opinion TLOU remastered is still the best rated game of the year with your Halo:redeemed edition 0.5 points behind.
The fact that people dismiss indy games really piss me off. It is not acknowledging all the hard work that indies put into their games, especially when a lot of them are better games than plenty of boxed games.
It's not difficult because we're seeing PS4 versions of games sell better than any other version of them. So people have decided that they'd have more fun with those versions than they would've with a PS3 or 360 version of the same game. I won't touch a last gen version of a game if I can get it on the PS4. It's simply going to be a better game on that platform.
Man there is hardly any difference between them, don't care how many milliseconds of slow down a comparison video shows to show you the difference, there is hardly nothing between them in reality
Oh did I hurt your feeling? Do Sony pay you or something?
Look at this thread and article. I'm not alone.
Sony first party has dropped the ball. Hopefully next year is better.
How do you feel that the author named a game for his argument that is not yet out on PS3 and is not developed by the same studio as the one that made the currently released versions? Speaking of Shadow of Mordor.To put it another way, if the PS4 literally did not exist and the PS3/360 gen had just gone on another year, would you have had a substantially worse time playing games this year?
Very few people would be able to truly answer "yes" to that, if they were being totally honest with themselves.
I like the PS4 and if I'm going to buy a multi-platform title I'm obviously going to buy it on PS4, but if I didn't have one and I bought the same game on PS3 it's still the same game.
Last gen ports.If PS4 has no games, what have I been playing all year?
Wow, what great and mature responses guys.
I sold my PS4 for the exact reasons Eurogamer states. Great system but it lacks the great online service, frequent updates and exciting exclusives the Xbox One does.
For a website that has a section dedicated to dissecting games down to minute differences in framerate and IQ, this argument really doesn't make much sense. I'd still buy PS4 just to be able to enjoy BF4 with better graphics, framerate, player count and party chat even if it didn't have any exclusives.This isn't "Microsoft vs. Sony," this is just about PS4's first year.
It's very, very difficult to argue with Eurogamer's conclusion that if you hadn't bought a PS4 this year you could easily have had just as good a time playing the same games on PS3.
Ps4 has had a decent first year but has yet to have that real "next gen" experience.
This feels like a half step up from last gen, not a leap. Pretty depressing.
Lol I can't tell if sarcasm or not.
Sorry for missing out on Bloodborne then.
Ps4 has had a decent first year but has yet to have that real "next gen" experience.
This feels like a half step up from last gen, not a leap. Pretty depressing.
What the shit is this. If you actually were an indy dev, you would not be calling indy games a filler, especially when plenty of them are higher quality than AAA games.
I'm guessing people have busy Sundays since they don't have the time to read past the title?
It was very pretty but a step back as a game.I'd say Infamous is the most "nextgen" game this gen so far. And the game was released in march.
It's the most technically and visually impressive game this gen so far. That's pretty impressive considerijg it's an open world game..
Man there is hardly any difference between them, don't care how many milliseconds of slow down a comparison video shows to show you the difference, there is hardly nothing between them in reality
chuck_bone said:To me, this looks like an article calculated to counter the negativity surrounding the Xbox One since it's announcement. But that's no excuse for poor journalism.
EG have just trotted out the same old tropes that get repeated in fanboy debates and stamped their official seal on them as if they are fact.
PSN Dowtime? Sure - but in the context of both platforms, XBL has hardly been perfection:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/17/xbox_live_problems/
http://www.express.co.uk/life-style...mbies-Halo-achievements-Call-Of-Duty-problems
http://kotaku.com/xbox-live-is-down-dont-blame-titanfall-1541665467
http://www.cnet.com/news/xbox-live-down-microsoft-at-work-on-a-fix/
http://www.*****************/2014/1...wn-sorry-we-cant-show-your-friends-right-now/
http://levelsave.com/destinys-public-beta-stress-test-just-crashed-xbox-lives-party-system/
http://forums.forzamotorsport.net/turn10_postst2474_Multi-Player-Connection-problems.aspx
http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/forza-5-is-unplayable-online.453663845/
http://n4g.com/news/1538224/xbox-on...nues-with-transformers-rise-of-the-dark-spark
Yes, I'm selectively quoting, and I'm sure some of you genuinely have experienced PSN downtime (outside publicised scheduled maintenance), but the pretence that XBL is a massively superior service is just that - a pretence, and EG should be ashamed for perpetuating that myth.
As for the lack of 1st party games - the Xbox One is hardly head and shoulders above the PS4 in terms of quantity and quality of exclusives.
After a lengthy drought that lasted most of the summer for 1st party games, with 3 high profile games being released together since September, one of which is merely a remaster of several older games that will appeal mainly to fans of that series!
Even then, neither console has yet to get a brand new, system exclusive title that receives over 8/10!
Apart from MCC, none of the games released have exactly been massive sellers, and have done little to expand the user base of the Xbone.
Yes, the situation is WORSE on the PS4, but only *just*.
Considering the games that have shifted systems this year have all been multi-platform, especially the franchise games like COD and BF4, FIfa, etc - it's those games that the mass market want to play.
Not inFamous, Forza, Dead Rising, Ryse, Killzone, Driveclub or Sunset Overdrive.
With that in mind, consumers are choosing the 'best' platform to experience those multi-platform franchise games, and invariably that is the PS4.
In nearly every benchmark, the PS4 has had the best image quality - with nary a compromise. AC:U is probably the only high profile example, but the least said about that abomination, the better.
I don't think even Sony expected the transition between last and current gen would be so rapid either. They concentrated efforts on geting AAA games out for the PS3 last year, with The Last of Us, GT6, and Beyond:Two Souls featuring easily.
The PS4 got a small amount of attention by comparison.
By comparison, MS shifted focus to the next generation far quicker - and moved a number of XBOX 360 games to the XBOX One -
Ryse was meant to be a Kinect game on the 360, Dead Rising 3 was originally a 360 release, and you can bet your bottom dollar so was FOrza 5 to begin with.
But they sacrificed mass-market sales for the sole intent of bolstering the 1st party line-up for the Xbox One.
Unfortunately, none of the launch titles were really compelling for either console - only Forza 5 really stood out, but only just. So I'll agree that MS have done a better job this year, but only because they started at such a low point.
Unfortunately this article is clearly designed to spark this kind of debate, and does little service to paint an accurate picture of PS4s enjoyment of their console - which is immense, otherwise sales would have dropped off rapidly, and the Xbone or Wii would be taking up the slack.
Well said.Ps4 has had a decent first year but has yet to have that real "next gen" experience.
This feels like a half step up from last gen, not a leap. Pretty depressing.
I sold my PS4 for the exact reasons Eurogamer states. Great system but it lacks the great online service, frequent updates and exciting exclusives the Xbox One does.
The PS4's launch set the tone for its first year: the games weren't stellar, but it didn't seem to matter. The first-party line-up was thin - Knack was dire, Killzone Shadow Fall was dazzling but hollow, DriveClub was delayed - but Sony was carrying so much momentum and goodwill, nothing could stop it.
How do you feel that the author named a game for his argument that is not yet out on PS3 and is not developed by the same studio as the one that made the currently released versions? Speaking of Shadow of Mordor.
IMO we can't know yet whether or not it's the same game, as we haven't seen any footage of that game yet. And this is a game that actually was mentioned to have been reduced in scope not only in graphics.
One platform has somehow become less desirable as time goes on while the other has transformed from something genuinely terrible to something desirable.
Man there is hardly any difference between them, don't care how many milliseconds of slow down a comparison video shows to show you the difference, there is hardly nothing between them in reality
Last gen ports.
Thing is, PS4 doesn't exist in a vacuum. The person who wrote the article has access to every platform, including PC. In that context, PS4's offering was pretty dire.
PlayStation 4 has had a great year. But PlayStation 4 owners haven't, not really.
It was very pretty but a step back as a game.
I mean something that couldn't be achieved on last gen as well as being technically impressive.
Last gen ports.
Thing is, PS4 doesn't exist in a vacuum. The person who wrote the article has access to every platform, including PC. In that context, PS4's offering was pretty dire.
Yeah, the whole using firmware updates as a one up point is pretty darn funny.
As soon as I see someone use it I automatically stop reading the rest of their post.
Because the games are better on these machines than their predecessors.
But I think we can have the argument, given that it was argued that you can play this on PS3. Which you at this moment in time you couldn't. Nor could you do that one and a half month ago.It's out in a matter of days, and it's not really an argument we can have without knowing how the game compares.
How does PS4 become less desirable when the platform has only grown since then? (more features added, more games released, more games announced.) Price hasn't increased either.
Im starting to believe that mass people aka people not using gaming forums are much smarter than we think. They are smart enough not to exclude games and realise that PS4 actually has a lot of good games. Why else would PS4 sell so much? Obviously its gotta have games.
Why in the hell is everything so negative and hyperbolic?