Tag worthy.Sticky this to the top before another hundred butt-hurt Xbox purchasers come in and keep embarrassing themselves.
Tag worthy.Sticky this to the top before another hundred butt-hurt Xbox purchasers come in and keep embarrassing themselves.
Well it may vary from to area to area but some areas do have a pretty significant difference according to these:
]
Rockstar just shot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about grass culture (I'm a vegetarian), but growth and bushiness are huge parts of it. It's not like it is with pubic hair where you are allowed to remove it. If you leave out grass in your video game, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the weed-loving gaming public, after hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase GTAV for either system, nor will they purchase any of Rockstar's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Rockstar has alienated an entire market with this move.
Rockstar, publicly grow some weed on the Xbone or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Karma is a bitch, they say ?
I'm just happy there is no parity. The increased power is being used. Great job, Rock*!
YesSorry to ask but, this is coming from the Final Fantasy XIII multiplatform announcement right ?
More like Ban worthy. This isn't the gametrailers forum.Tag worthy.
I think it's off base to suggest that these situations are the same.this right here... Eurogamer not wanting to dry up that MS advertising well..
last gen http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off
This gen
In truth, PlayStation 3 owners won't really miss it. Many of the nips and tucks only really become noticeable in the Face-Off environment, and won't really impact the gameplay experience.
That looks amazing.Haha, had trouble finding animals I shot here....
They do. However, DLC is often region-locked, and the chances of a single player DLC is worth considering.I'm in the UK at the moment, does anybody know if UK PS4 games work on Australian PS4's?
Ah okay, but I read that, scenes that stress the cpu the Xboxone version is better, so it's a moot point..
Please. Just stop. Putting -gate after every "controversy" is more useless than the conversations themselves. Stop trying to make this a suffix. It's not.
PLEASE.
I don't understand why anyone gives a crap about grass. It's grass.
EDIT: I just woke up and subsequently am extremely salty. But please. I don't want the English language to be bastardized any further.
As someone who owns both consoles, sometimes I wish the Xbox was equal to the PS4 in hardware just so I can play third party games on it.
Looking at my Xbox library it's titanfall, forza and sunset
Sorry to ask but, this is coming from the Final Fantasy XIII multiplatform announcement right ?
Sticky this to the top before another hundred butt-hurt Xbox purchasers come in and keep embarrassing themselves.
I can't wait to see the comparisons to PC come January, that'll be a much bigger difference.
Until then I've got the Xbox version.
My x1 is basically an exclusive machine while my PS4 buckles under the giga weight of 3rd party games.
Im fine with that though. Best of both worlds.
When i purchases both last year, this is how I thought it was going to play out.
But after using both systems for the last 12 months, i still end up buying my multiplats on XB1. Its where my friends are and I just like Xbox OS more than the PS4 OS.
Call me crazy, but i actually like the snap feature, and "xbox record that" is more handy to me. Also, I like the simplicity of UPLOAD Studio much more than Share Factory.
Overall, I do wish the XB1 was more powerful because this is probably going to be more of an issue as time goes on. However, for now, my XB1 still gets the majority of my purchases, knowing full-well that they're the technically inferior versions.
Also, was a new thread really needed?
When i purchases both last year, this is how I thought it was going to play out.
But after using both systems for the last 12 months, i still end up buying my multiplats on XB1. Its where my friends are and I just like Xbox OS more than the PS4 OS.
Call me crazy, but i actually like the snap feature, and "xbox record that" is more handy to me. Also, I like the simplicity of UPLOAD Studio much more than Share Factory.
Overall, I do wish the XB1 was more powerful because this is probably going to be more of an issue as time goes on. However, for now, my XB1 still gets the majority of my purchases, knowing full-well that they're the technically inferior versions.
They are green with envy.
Sticky this to the top before another hundred butt-hurt Xbox purchasers come in and keep embarrassing themselves.
Is that X1 version?Haha, had trouble finding animals I shot here....
Why do you imply that the only GTA5 difference is grass? What about DF pointing out the ps4 hold 30fps better and the Xbox one is missing lighting effects? (Lens flare)Why do people act as the only difference on RDR was foliage and call DF biased?
720p MSAAx2 and better framerate vs 1152x640 Qx, with reduced LOD and missing effects and shadows.
Foliage differences didn't got any relevance in that article:
Also, was a new thread really needed?
Ah okay, but I read that, scenes that stress the cpu the Xboxone version is better, so it's a moot point..
Which scenes?
What if the only difference is a higher frame rate and resolution? Do you really think they'll add more detail in the actual world? I mean... it'd be nice. But... I'm not holing my breath.
Why do you imply that the only GTA5 difference is grass? What about DF pointing out the ps4 hold 30fps better and the Xbox one is missing lighting effects? (Lens flare)
Awwww are the big bad people talking in a way that you don't personally approve?
How horrible, horrible.
btw those gifs that you quoted are hilarious!
Dude he read that. Let's not quibble over unimportant details.
Overall, this is the kind of effect where the PS4's larger GPU and higher fill-rate come to the fore, and while it shouldn't impact any purchasing decision (Xbox One is hardly barren and featureless in the affected locations), it's nice to see that Rockstar has utilised the additional graphics power on tap in the Sony console.
Is that X1 version?
I think it's off base to suggest that these situations are the same.
The biggest issue with Red Dead on PS3 is not the lack of foliage, rather, the frame-rate. It's a pretty steady 30 fps on Xbox 360 but, on PS3, it dips a lot and feels much worse as a result. On top of that it's a sub-720p resolution on PS3.
With GTAV the XO version runs at the same resolution as the PS4 version and basically just as well. It's still a good version.
I don't see how anyone could argue that this is the same thing.
Play on PS3 without having seen the 360 version and it's difficult to imagine that the fun factor of the game has been massively impacted
Xbox 360 is the version of Red Dead you should buy
Why is it hard to consider that they can change on their stance and now the differences are so inconsequential that it doesn't matter? Do they need to stay consistent with an analysis/recommendation made years ago?fine, I'll bite.
because the summary in the RDR was literally
the game, by their own words was a great purchase on the PS3 (given the greatness of the game)
but
yes it's been said a number of times in here "but PS3 had lower frame rate, and lower resolution". Ok, that's true. But at the same time, we see the XBONE version of GTAV having less detail. Smaller difference than RDR? Absolutely. But then again, why is it "this version is objectively better, buy it" but then GTAV "this version is objectively better. make your own choice."
the standard of the RDR article would seem to be "even though both versions are good in their own right, buy the better", yet the standard for GTAV is "even though both versions are good in their own right, buy the one you want", even though the conclusion of the lesser version of both is "your enjoyment of the game won't be impacted"
the level of "how much better/worse" is a moving target, absolutely. But in the case of one being objectively better than the other, shouldn't they be recommending the objectively better one each time?
The PS4 advantage here is much more subtle - a few bonus plants and small grassy areas. Overall, this is the kind of effect where the PS4's larger GPU and higher fill-rate come to the fore, and while it shouldn't impact any purchasing decision (Xbox One is hardly barren and featureless in the affected locations),
It is.
Had to swing the camera into the air to find a deer/buck. Couldn't see the darn thing.
Let's just wait on Digital Foundry's full analysis
If one performs better than the other, it doesn't "deserve" the same score.Why is it hard to consider that they can change on their stance and now the differences are so inconsequential that it doesn't matter? Do they need to stay consistent with an analysis/recommendation made years ago?
the level of "how much better/worse" is a moving target, absolutely. But in the case of one being objectively better than the other, shouldn't they be recommending the objectively better one each time?
How about in the meantime you link where did you read the stuff about CPU intensive scenes?
Those pictures are different time of year.
When i purchases both last year, this is how I thought it was going to play out.
But after using both systems for the last 12 months, i still end up buying my multiplats on XB1. Its where my friends are and I just like Xbox OS more than the PS4 OS.
Call me crazy, but i actually like the snap feature, and "xbox record that" is more handy to me. Also, I like the simplicity of UPLOAD Studio much more than Share Factory.
Overall, I do wish the XB1 was more powerful because this is probably going to be more of an issue as time goes on. However, for now, my XB1 still gets the majority of my purchases, knowing full-well that they're the technically inferior versions.