The Kinect decision is so that all owners of an X1 own a Kinect, so therefore the X1 market=the Kinect market, as opposed to the 360 market > the Kinect market. This way, developers who want to make games for/using Kinect will be more inclined to do so now that the market isn't like 1/4-1/3 of the base console.
Sony made a bit of a mistake, for better or for worse, when they chose not to include the Eye with their console. Now their controllers have a silly blue light on the back that can't be turned off and have no purpose.
actually its the opposite.
sony waited, and after they saw what happened they directly did the right thing.
microsoft on the other hand, does not look like they have the feline reflexes that they SHOULD have.
btw, I never asked for the kinect to be removed from xbox bundles. even though offering a "core" console without the camera&mic is the correct thing to do.
last time i checked, xbox is a global product, but many countries do not have cable tv, do not have most of the apps. so why the forced camera?
but anyway, what I asked is that I have the OPTION TO PHYSICALLY DETACH THE KINECT FROM THE CONSOLE, THROW IT AWAY AND THE CONSOLE WILL STILL FUNCTION.
if microsoft cant do that for me, then I can do very little for microsoft....!