• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

famousmortimer: Xbox One OS and Xbox Live issues bouncing about as we approach launch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I missed Jschreier...What did he say?

And about Gies and Kuchera, Gies in particular, is another fanboy, one pretending to be a journalist at that, really needed?...oh lets not forget "truth to power" Seriously? Nah Screw that, shit or get of the pot. Or you know what do not pretend to be journos and just admit that you are just another extension of the PR machine and overall a fanboy.
He defended the use of anonymous sources to the Kooch and also implied he would be writing a piece about this story today.
 

ironcreed

Banned
This is getting embarrassing for MS.

It has been since the Xbox One was announced and all of the so called unbelievable rumors actually proved to be true. That is what makes this newest round of Xbox One woes all the more worrying. Right at launch, no less.
 
The last 3 years have been rough. This launch software wise is clearly demonstrating the power of competition. MS clearly sat back and said "Well shit. Our software line up has been a little sparse since '10...Let's fix that.

Where as Sony who over the past 3 years have been lauded for their diverse software lineup have slipped this launch.

This stuff goes in cycles.

I don't undersatnd what happen to wiiu then. Where are they in the cycle?
 

SpartanN92

Banned
LIVE was the greatest thing to happen to PSN, it lit a fire under Sony's ass find a way to compete and a improved online infrastructure and PS+ was born

MS failing would be devastating for this industry, it would take years for someone else to fill the void which would allow Sony maintain status quo

THIS!



And who knows where the future takes us from here. Clearly PS+ success has driven MS to proceed down a similar avenue with Games for Gold (Still in it's infancy, I'm certain the free games will get MUCH better eventually)
 

foxbeldin

Member
omgdjp1b.png

hector-salamanca-o.gif
 

JimmyRustler

Gold Member
Any monopoly is nothing consumers want.
There will be no monopoly in gaming as long as there are PCs - and those aren't going anywhere.

I think you guys don't even realize how much of a pillar the hardcore gamers are for this industry. If Sony gets the monopoly, the fucks up and we go away they won't get far.
 
Competition is good; I'd hope MS sticks around but I would dearly hope they never get control. MS end game has been clear from the start and it's nothing gamers or consumers want.

Microsoft just needs their revelation. Sony had theirs with the PS3. They learned from their mistakes. Hopefully Microsoft will humble after (or during) this generation. As big a PS fan as I am, I embrace the competition because it makes Sony stay on their toes.
 
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=682145

I'll let you find your post in this thread :p

Well, you did some digging there - and you're right, I guess. We are all guilty of wanting change in one area or another with our favorite hobby. I do think there's a big difference between wanting COD to fail if only to force publishers to move in a new direction vs an entire console tanking.

I think we all can agree that having MS and Sony fighting it out on even ground is a good thing. If one of them fails then it will inevitably effect the industry in ways that we all lose out. COD and niche fans alike.
 
Competition is good; I'd hope MS sticks around but I would dearly hope they never get control. MS end game has been clear from the start and it's nothing gamers or consumers want.

I shudder to think what PSN would look like if Live never existed.

I don't see either company getting control over the industry anytime soon, they both make great products at the end of the day, and the generation has yet to start. And yeah, I didn't ever use PSN this gen because XBL was so good, but there's no doubt in my mind because of XBL PSN this gen will be just as good for multiplayer gaming. Competition breeds great products, and we are fortunate to have two companies battle it out like Sony and MS. No one should wish for the failure and exodus of either company from the industry, at the end it hurts the consumer if that were to happen. It's not an easy industry to enter either, for those who believe Valve should for example replace MS.
 

BeauRoger

Unconfirmed Member
Dumbest thing I have ever heard here. Actually wanting a console to fail. THOUSANDS of jobs at stake, and a product that some people enjoy. Frankly I wouldn't play games any where near as much if Halo wasn't a thing.

If you don't want it don't buy it, but don't wish for it to fail. So stupid.

I bet you desperately wanted Steam to fail too?

Edit: If either Sony or MS were to fail that would leave the other with damn near a monopoly. That is the LAST thing we want.

Nothing dumb about his post at all. The opposite implication, (which seems to be more in your line of thinking) is that every company should succeed no matter their business practices and or/ethical stances, just to save the jobs of their employees, no matter how vile that company may otherwise be.
 

Krilekk

Banned
Nope! Nothing wrong with wanting a company to fail if you believe they are a detrimental influence on your hobby. The Xbone initial reveal and policies have just shown gamers their true colors and how little they regard consumer rights.


Microsoft is a bad influence on the gaming industry and I'd love to see the Xbone fail.

Nothing wrong with maximising profits. But you have to realize you need competition to get things. Without MS you wont get free PSN games, pay 599 for the console and have a multiplayer paywall. Plus DRM.
 
LIVE was the greatest thing to happen to PSN, it lit a fire under Sony's ass find a way to compete and a improved online infrastructure and PS+ was born

MS failing would be devastating for this industry, it would take years for someone else to fill the void which would allow Sony maintain status quo


As I have said before. Without the 360, there would be no PS4 as we know it. I pray both consoles sell at least 5 million each at launch, and they both thrive.
 

Majmun

Member
It has been since the Xbox One was announced and all of the so called unbelievable rumors actually proved to be true. That is what makes this newest round of Xbox One woes all the more worrying. Right at launch, no less.

And they just kinda recovered from the DRM-mess. Now this.

Launch should be interesting.
 

SpartanN92

Banned
I don't undersatnd what happen to wiiu then. Where are they in the cycle?

The success of Sony and MS will cause them to see the error of their ways and either A: Make a new console relatively soon or B: Make a goddamn Pokemon MMO and watch people flock to them.

This is part of the cycle...Nintendo kicked ass and took names this gen (At least in hardware sales).... hey got complacent. Thought they could ride the Wii name forever. They released a VERY VERY under powered console with no games.

If Nintendo is smart this holiday season will light a fire beneath their asses to do better next time.
 

Faustek

Member
You're assuming that people have access to things that they're not sharing because of what, exactly? A bunch of vague tweets from two or three people?

I can promise you that I will be sharing everything I've heard and everything I know, but the work week just started. Be patient, please.

OffTopic:

Hey Schreier, I had a beef with you earlier(you probably didn't notice me in all the whubub) during the Kamitani episode where I thought you were THE 14 year old child.
Always believed when one is set to critique another you must start by setting the level of discussion and I found that you set it at a 14 year old boys as you accused Kamitani of doing and even argued that his response was correct by sending, imo, sexy burly dwarves to you. I since not visited Kotaku since I couldn't stomach the majority of the comments.

But I promised one thing, if I ever found out you weren't a 14 year old dillweed I would apologize in the same forum I talked ill of you, so here it is, me saying sorry.

I'm sorry. You aren't a bad bloke. I hope you can take at least this one wrongdoers apology to heart.
 
Well, you did some digging there - and you're right, I guess. We are all guilty of wanting change in one area or another with our favorite hobby. I do think there's a big difference between wanting COD to fail if only to force publishers to move in a new direction vs an entire console tanking.

I think we all can agree that having MS and Sony fighting it out on even ground is a good thing. If one of them fails then it will inevitably effect the industry in ways that we all lose out. COD and niche fans alike.
I was just poking you :p I think it's normal to want, on some level, something to 'fail' if you think it's a bad product or represents ideas that you strongly oppose.. I'm sure I've done it too. Of course there is a reasonable way to go about it and a less reasonable way to do it ;)
 

GribbleGrunger

Dreams in Digital
The last 3 years have been rough. This launch software wise is clearly demonstrating the power of competition. MS clearly sat back and said "Well shit. Our software line up has been a little sparse since '10...Let's fix that.

Where as Sony who over the past 3 years have been lauded for their diverse software lineup have slipped this launch.

This stuff goes in cycles.

No they haven't. They just haven't up-ressed games intended for the PS3. They know for certain that they can sell as many PS4s as they can manufacture so there's very little point in rushing games to market in order to have lots of 1st party games available. This is probably why they decided to delay Driveclub. As far as the lineup overall is concerned, Sony has more games catering to a wider demographic, including FTP games, Indie games and AAA games (both 1st and 3rd party).
 

Crackbone

Member
I think they will. Once they have sold through the holiday and squeezed every willing purchaser out of the extra $100 they will go cheaper and kinectless.



This shit just goes in cycles. Thats the way it works. Who knows...By the end of the gen MS could end up being everyone's champion of gaming and Sony could be on the shitlist...Or Nintendo could get their shit together
lol

Agreed.

I have no sympathy for the Microsoft position as it stands. They've created this bed.

They need to stop with the sidestepping of questions and just be honest about the current situation and what they are going to do to fix it.

I honestly think that would go quite a bit further in repairing their image. (Will they? I don't know, history would suggest they won't).
 

danwarb

Member
It has been since the Xbox One was announced and all of the so called unbelievable rumors actually proved to be true. That is what makes this newest round of Xbox One woes all the more worrying. Right at launch, no less.
A few multiplatform titles running at different resolutions? We had that all through the PS360 gen.

The downclock turned into an upclock and they came out straight themselves with the original DRM and DD policies, before changing that up.
 

viveks86

Member
Good morning Gaf! Missed about 20 pages. I've seen the latest from jack frags and swiftdeath's chronicles. Is there anything else I should know?
 

Verendus

Banned
The last 3 years have been rough. This launch software wise is clearly demonstrating the power of competition. MS clearly sat back and said "Well shit. Our software line up has been a little sparse since '10...Let's fix that.

Where as Sony who over the past 3 years have been lauded for their diverse software lineup have slipped this launch.

This stuff goes in cycles.
Sony has announced 10 games out of 20 due to be released in the first year. Three are there at launch, another two following in the launch window. I don't see what the problem is. What is this obsession with launch? It's not like SCE released 6 games in one month in the past 3 years, and then decided to relax for the remaining 11 months. Releases are naturally spaced out.
 

Dragon

Banned
A few multiplatform titles running at different resolutions? We had that all through the PS360 gen.

The downclock turned into an upclock and they came out straight themselves with the original DRM and DD policies, before changing that up.

There's a difference between 640p vs. 720p and 720p vs. 1080p. People made a big deal about the resolution and framerate differences then, if they're bigger now why isn't it a big deal?
 

EGM1966

Member
What I find incredible is that with 3OSes and 3GB of OS reservation, they're now offloading VOIP to the game's code and partition. What are they even doing with that 3GB reservation? That's exactly the kind of thing it should be being used for, surely?

Have to admit I'm surprised by some of the stuff being kicked around in this regard. They have a lot of memory available (slower than PS4 or not) and it really should be okay for this stuff.

Only thing I can think of is the OS is heavily focused on media/TV integration instead and very fast app / program swapping. After all looking at latest Smart TVs MS are going to have to have features/speed that convinces you to even bother with running stuff through your XB1 in the first place vs just firing up Netflix or whatever on your TV directly and saving a yourself money on electricity in the process.

But even so - I would have thought all this stuff was in the OS. Only other angle I can think of is this is some kind of temporary fix due to the 180s - i.e. the original infrastructure was so tightly tied together around always on, etc. they couldn't reverse it all in time and decided on a workaround (although this seems unlikely to me too).

Dang it just doesn't make sense to me and I'd love someone to explain why they'd take this approach.
 

SpartanN92

Banned
Nothing dumb about his post at all. The opposite implication, (which seems to be more in your line of thinking) is that every company should succeed no matter their business practices and or/ethical stances, just to save the jobs of their employees, no matter how vile that company may otherwise be.

No the market will decide how it works. I am saying you don't WANT this to happen. For the sake of jobs and diversity you don't WANT it to happen.

For example: I'm not a fan of the current American government administration. I don't WANT it to fail because of the repercussions but that doesn't mean that voters won't decide that.


All I was saying from the beginning was that hoping for a console (or any product to fail) is stupid. Unless it is directly hurting you in someway there is no reason for you not to live and let live.

All XBO has done in it's current state is make PS4 look better in most regards. They are now forced to go on the offensive to try and win back every customer they lost by creating a more appealing product/game etc...Then Sony will do the same thing again, then Nintendo, then MS ETC.......
 
Now I'm going to cry

Im not saying its a good or bad thing if microsoft leaves the market, just that there as much advantages as disadvantages to their presence in the gaming landscape.

Likewise, a industry without Sony would mean much more emphasis on graphically unimpressive but extremely colourful games based around gameplay first graphics second. Especially if console maker sega survived.

Nobody is too big to fail. Gaming will not die and nobody will every the absolute monopoly Nintendo once enjoyed.

All that will happen is the gaming landscape will change and what is in vogue now will be old hat. It would upset some but most will adapt and move on.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Good lord. Sounds like this will be a messy launch on both sides

The good old tradition of never buying at launch holds more weight than ever, it would seem. Play what you got, watch from the sidelines and then hop on in once the dust starts to settle a few months later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom