• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry Admits To Botching Battlefield 4 PS4/XB1 Video Capture

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guerilla

Member
You're talking nonsense. If people are to lazy to read and yet want to join the discussion who's fault is that again?

As for MS benefiting, they benefit anyways. The foreshadowing of complete and utter disaster for Xbone on this forum was so strong that the idea of parity, let alone thoughts of the Xbone version looking better, is a huge win for MS.

MS has one more hurdle to cross with COD: Ghosts. If they can pass that hurdle they can fully refocus on the difference between X1 and PS4 as far as 1st party games go and that's an area where they are more then competitive.

He's not talking just about neogaf, neogaf was just an example. Most people just browse the pics so Microsoft benefited greatly from this, whether it was intentional or not he doesn't know. So it seems you're completely missing and misinterpreting his point.
 

The Jason

Member
I think that this should be added to the OP.

dark10x specifically said he wasn't a spokesman for DF and therefore there is no admission, basically making the entire thread moot.
Even if its not official, he admits that DF is aware of the issue, yet has made no public statement regarding the inaccurate capture
 

Gaz_RB

Member
Even if its not official, he admits that DF is aware of the issue, yet has made no public statement regarding the inaccurate capture

If you read the DF article that accompanied the video they do indeed mention it and how it could be a capture problem...
 

mocoworm

Member
That does not negate the thread at all, he gave us vital piece of information that completely changes the nature of the article.

That's just my understanding of how things went down (as in, it was a special event and DF brought its own capture hardware while everyone else used elgato boxes handed out by reps)

I think that the thread title being 'Digital Foundry Admits To Botching Battlefield 4 PS4/XB1 Video Capture' does not correlate to the quotes I just gave from dark10x, the source of this story.

He SPECIFICALLY says 'that's just my statement on the situation not an official DF statement'
 

Rainy Dog

Member
Shouldn't they have noticed something was wrong with the captures before editing? Some of gaf members spotted the issues off the bat.

Of course they should. All footage is clearly at different video output levels, even to the untrained eye. Then again, they've done the same thing before so it doesn't surprise me.
 

News Bot

Banned
Oh man.

Admitting the mistake on GAF rather than their own site is idiotic. They should take down the article temporarily and edit it to reflect that they initially fucked up. They didn't do it intentionally, though. It also doesn't matter whether it's an "official" statement or not. If that's how it went down, that's how it went down. If it isn't how it went down, why say anything at all?

Still, with blunders like these coupled with Leadbetter's weird fanboyism, I can see why people would be frustrated with them.
 

mocoworm

Member
Ok, but then another question must be asked. Why all other comparison videos from other sites don't show the same results?

I agree, DF fucked up. I am not saying otherwise, but they have not officially admitted it which is what this thread title says.
 

DenogginizerOS

BenjaminBirdie's Thomas Jefferson
So, the part where they disparage the PS4 for lacking clarity is partly due to their mistakes and yet, they are leaving that tripe in their comparison even after admitting their mistake on NeoGAF?
 

Vitor711

Member
Oh man.

Admitting the mistake on GAF rather than their own site is idiotic. They should take down the article temporarily and edit it to reflect that they initially fucked up. They didn't do it intentionally, though.

Still, with blunders like these coupled with Leadbetter's weird fanboyism, I can see why people would be frustrated with them.

Wow - commenting on an article and not reading the thread first is idiotic.

It's not an official statement from DF, just an opinion from a guy who works there. They will update the article once they actually come out and address the issue because Eurogamer ALWAYS does that. They're pretty good at transparency.

Also, as people have said, the possible capture issues are mentioned several times in the actual comparison.

People only get frustrated with them when it's DF don't bolster their existing opinions. DF are the best at what they do and I think it's nuts how people are reacting to this. There's no conspiracy, never has been.
 

todahawk

Member
They weren't able to record new footage because of it being a review event, and decided not to focus on the color saturation in their analysis because it was suspect. Their analysis and their review match up, and justifies posting their comparison video.

Sorry, not our problem... compared to the other vids out there they shouldn't have posted theirs. Look at how many people were confused last night because they were focusing on the captures and not what was written in the article.
 

Bailers

Member
Call me naive, but I think it's an honest mistake.
I think it was too. If you read the comment here, it's obvious to me at least that they had no reason to believe their method was flawed or in anyway would get a biased result. It's only after the other videos were posted to the Internet that they saw the differences. I think it was honestly a mistake that they were trying to be as unbiased as possible, which ended up being worse.
 
I'm shocked at how angry people are getting about either an article they didn't read or a regular eurogamer feature that they've never read.

Digital Foundry is the gold standard for graphics analysis, and have more than justified themselves with their years of articles. In this "horribly biased, botched" article, they even mentioned multiple times in the article that they thought something was up with their capture kits and told the reader not to focus on what they thought was an error on their part, and didn't let that factor into their analysis.

I'm not seeing what the huge sin is.

The huge sin are the screenshots and video footage that people are using to claim the boner version is superior. Other review sites have had completely opposite results.
 
I would just like to say that it is refreshing to see Digital Foundry admit that their capture was not calibrated very well. However, I would have thought that after seeing the game in person, they would have known that something was wrong and prefaced that in their comparison. They spent a paragraph talking about the settings, how they captured the footage, they could have simply included "We did notice our video capture came out pretty dark in comparison to what we saw, this could be that our settings are not fine tuned for next gen hardware. We are looking into it"


Also, in their defense, they did mention that their were some weird settings that were causing the PS4 to appear washed out, and didn't crush the blacks like the Xbox One version, and they said it could be a capture situation. However, both captures were incredibly dark regardless.


Finally, for everyone that is screaming MS and DF conspiracy theory, did you even read the comparison? No matter what the videos really looked like, or how clear and bright the comparison images were, the actual text if you read it doesn't really give the Xbox One much of an edge anywhere. Its not like they said it had a lot of advantages, and tried to make each version seem similar. They basically said the PS4 outperforms the Xbox One version in every way. So I don't think they were intentionally trying to make them look similar, or downplay any differences, when their actual text in the article (if anyone would read it) makes each version sound quite different.
 

Kspraydad

Banned
YSvMS1N.gif
GIF captured off XO? Blacks are crushed.
 
I agree that it's possible for some people to think it looks good and prefer it over something like what the video showed of the PS4. Despite the loss of detail.

I'm not talking PS4 vs Xbone. I'm making a general statement since this person who obviously learned a new word last night is spouting nonsense about it being objectively bad when I can tell you that that's not the case.
 

News Bot

Banned
Wow - commenting on an article and not reading the thread first is idiotic.

It's not an official statement from DF, just an opinion from a guy who works there. They will update the article once they actually come out and address the issue because Eurogamer ALWAYS does that. They're pretty good at transparency.

Also, as people have said, the possible capture issues are mentioned several times in the actual comparison.

I read the thread fine.

He shouldn't have commented at all, but instead he expressly said "that's how I understand it went down." That's not "I'm just speculatin'!" It doesn't matter whether it's an official statement or not. If that's such an issue, he shouldn't have said anything at all.
 

Into

Member
I think that the thread title being 'Digital Foundry Admits To Botching Battlefield 4 PS4/XB1 Video Capture' does not correlate to the quotes I just gave from dark10x, the source of this story.

He SPECIFICALLY says 'that's just my statement on the situation not an official DF statement'

Official or not, they fucked up. Bill Clinton did not need to admit to banging his intern, for it to be true or not. He was doing it, whether it was official or not.
 

darkwing

Member
So, the part where they disparage the PS4 for lacking clarity is partly due to their mistakes and yet, they are leaving that tripe in their comparison even after admitting their mistake on NeoGAF?

I don't think they disparage the PS4

Perhaps the biggest takeaway is that, in this near-finalised state, the PS4 offers a superior experience on several fronts. The resolution is higher at 1600x900, as compared to the tried and tested 1280x720 on Xbox One, suffering as it does for more visible aliasing artefacts. Visually, the PS4 has a marked advantage with ambient occlusion effects too, which simply isn't matched on Microsoft's platform with the build we played.
 

DenogginizerOS

BenjaminBirdie's Thomas Jefferson
I don't think they disparage the PS4
They do with regards to clarity.

But the differences we saw don't just stop at resolution. Both versions are treated to post-processing anti-aliasing too, seemingly equivalent to the refined, high setting on PC. However, this doesn't tell the whole story. As you may notice in our screengrabs, the actual results on PS4 lack the corresponding level of crystal clarity we'd expect of such a significant resolution boost. This should surely be a home run for Sony's console, but what is likely to be a software-based upscale to 1080p delivers less-than-stellar returns, and for better or worse leaves the Xbox One with an often crisper looking, albeit much more aliased image.
 

Paracelsus

Member
Just check the first page of the faceoff thread, you could tell something was horribly wrong. I was reading while having the video run in a separate window and I couldn't tell which one was supposed to be the better version, the text read like sarcasm.

I wonder how many people got swayed by such a lazy effort.
 

~~Hasan~~

Junior Member
lol @ DF admit it

they got cought by neogaf. and they didn't admit anything yet.

if it wasn't for the gaffers here, they would't have said anything.

and if they admit it, they should update their article. its clear what is the motive behind this. and frankly, they deserve the shit they are getting.

you do not fuck up one of the biggest games this holiday, and the very first PS4 vs Xbox one and then let it slide in hope no one notice it. by trying to make the xbox one look as good as possible while killing the PS4 version.
 

StuBurns

Banned
DF have been a joke since he fucked up the FFXIII comparison and people had to bug him until he was forced to do a decent job, and even then it was an embarrassing shit show. However, until now, they've at least always been fair with the objective aspects of their comparisons.

Bad form DF, bad form.
 

kpaadet

Member

Vitor711

Member
I read the thread fine.

He shouldn't have commented at all, but instead he expressly said "that's how I understand it went down." That's not "I'm just speculatin'!"

No, maybe not as he didn't write the article. But then maybe we shouldn't turn it into an attention grabbing headline without making sure the sources are concrete? All of which still makes your complaints about DF not rectifying the article somewhat moot.

Also "that's how I understand things" and "that's my opinion" are pretty damned interchangeable as his understanding is not fact. It amounts to the same thing.
 

mocoworm

Member
Official or not, they fucked up. Bill Clinton did not need to admit to banging his intern, for it to be true or not. He was doing it, whether it was official or not.

On GAF, facts matter. They matter a LOT. This is not DF admitting anything like the thread title says. The source of the story said he has no official capacity to make that admission.

I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

DF probably will make that statement, they just haven't yet and that makes this thread title a disingenuous one. Imagine if all thread titles had leniency like this one?
 

flkraven

Member
Jeez, so much drama before launch. Literally every day it's more fuel on the fire. Can't wait to get legit side by sides so we can move on. It's just going to confirm what we already know. PS4 is more powerful than XB1 but it will amount to a minimal visual or performance difference this early in the gen
 
Alright here we go.

Here is the Jack upload vs. the DF upload screens

SU9Quo5.png


OPMarcq.png


Top is the DF video, you can see the crushed blacks

Bottom is the Jack upload, same scene you can see the difference in the wheel black

DF did it on purpose from what I see

For reference, had to edit my screens from page 18 of the original BF thread
 

Into

Member
On GAF, facts matter. They matter a LOT. This is not DF admitting anything like the thread title says. The source of the story said he has no official capacity to make that admission.

I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

DF probably will make that statement, they just haven't yet and that makes this thread title a disingenuous one. Imagine if all thread titles had leniency like this one?

Yes facts matter, and that is why the thread is here.
 

News Bot

Banned
No, maybe not as he didn't write the article. But then maybe we shouldn't turn it into an attention grabbing headline without making sure the sources are concrete? All of which still makes your complaints about DF not rectifying the article somewhat moot.

Also "that's how I understand things" and "that's my opinion" are pretty damned interchangeable as his understanding is not fact. It amounts to the same thing.

If he didn't write the article that's only even less reason to say anything.

I think the article's fine, but the media content needs revised.
 

Vitor711

Member
Ohh great, so it wasn't a mistake its just that their capture equipment is god awful, I'm not sure which is worse tbh.

*sigh* Their capture equipment isn't awful. It's just the first time they used it with next-gen consoles and they couldn't test it thoroughly as they were at a time-limited event.

Go through their comparison history - nearly all of their vids (which they tend to upload at a pretty damned high bit-rate and have available for download for better quality) are fantastic. And their Framerate comparison stuff is second to none. Their equipment is great and this oversight is completely understandable.

Should they update the article to reflect the issues? Yes of course but it's also been less than a day since it went online... Maybe give them some time GAF? Or are witchhunts best served warm?
 

mocoworm

Member
Yes facts matter, and that is why the thread is here.

Well if you agree that facts matter please link me to the official statement for 'Digital Foundry Admits To Botching Battlefield 4 PS4/XB1 Video Capture' and not the comments from dark10x
 

Guerilla

Member
On GAF, facts matter. They matter a LOT. This is not DF admitting anything like the thread title says. The source of the story said he has no official capacity to make that admission.

I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

DF probably will make that statement, they just haven't yet and that makes this thread title a disingenuous one. Imagine if all thread titles had leniency like this one?

Imo you're arguing semantics. Being an official statement is not as important as you think it is.
 

Radec

Member
Heh.. was wondering why the article itself is a glowing PS4 >>> XBone, while the images and videos says differently.
 
So having read the first page, it seems that

- Digital Foundry is biased against the Xbox One
- Digital Foundry is biased against the PS4
- Those who think Digital Foundry was right/wrong about ______ are irrational fanboys for _______.
 

panda-zebra

Member
Wow.Wow.And wow.More wow.

DF is best known for one thing, people have been waiting for this, all eyes on.. and they somehow suddenly cannot manage to pull off the one thing they are supposed to have leet ninjas status for? Yeah, wow is too fucking right.

That page should be pulled until they un-arse their vids.
 

keuja

Member
Official or not, it is obvious that something is not right in the DF footage. Looks very different than all the other vids.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom