Occassionally I think to myself, meh, 4Chan probably isn't as bad as I think it is, and then I read something like this, and all is right with the world again.
Dumbass goes on /v/ and then complains.
I spend my time on /v/ at work because for some reason military networks allow 4chan and it's safer for us. If you don't have thick skin and you're gonna bitch about the smallest thing don't go on any board on 4chan.
It's not for everyone.
The article never said she went to 4Chan. That's just the origination of the "raid." You know, like when they pull that crap on those facebook pages/websites dedicated to deceased loved ones or tries to
take down gawker when they bring up the fact that they're harassing an 11-year old girl. (I know that wasn't the whole site, just /b/, yadda yadda yadda. That's how you can have pedophiles and To-Catch-A-Predator-Wannabes on the same site.)
Anyhow, I feel bad for her having to deal with these scumbags. One thing I don't understand from her posts, however, is this line:
But just go fuck yourself if you think that games is a meritocracy.
Er... aren't games a meritocracy, in a way? If a game is good and/or interesting, it usually (but not always) becomes popular. If it's crap, not so much. I know there are exceptions to the rule, but I don't get what she's complaining about here.