Why do people keep saying two years? Is math really that hard? 2016 - 2013 = 2?
Polaris is GCN 1.3, it's not a revision but the next generation of Graphics Core Next. Liverpool (PS4) and Durango (XOne) are GCN 1.1 cores for comparison.Why would this be a gamechanger?
If anything it means polaris is just another GCN-revision, which is arguably not too awesome.
Developers have the ability to add Neo support to their existing PlayStation 4 titles coming out in September via a day one patch, while dual base/Neo supported titles are expected to arrive from October onwards.
That would just piss me off to no avail. I'd probably just drop Sony tbh. If I wanted incremental upgrades all the time I'd just go PC. Console gaming isn't using this system for a reason, it's all about value for money and longevity.
Read the post of the guy I replied to with that comment..........
That would just piss me off to no avail. I'd probably just drop Sony tbh. If I wanted incremental upgrades all the time I'd just go PC. Console gaming isn't using this system for a reason, it's all about value for money, longevity, and pure closed platform priority.
Make it 3-4 and sure. As long as they get it right first time this time.
No idea how my younger cousins etc will afford one, but no doubt they'll want one.
DF seems to think being polaris will give it a extra boost in performance. we really don't know much advantages polaris can offer being that it's new tech.
Because their competition is releasing new hardware...
The real reason for this is to push 4K content in general. It isn't meant to be console war fodder
There's also no indication at all that any of the functionality found in PlayStation VR's external processing box will make its way into the Neo hardware, though we would expect that the same base/Neo spec differentiation will apply to those titles just as they would to any PS4 game.
Here's where things get interesting - the 36 compute unit count cannot comfortably fit any of AMD's existing GPUs.
Wish they'd just wait another two years and do a proper jump to the PS5....
Best part is that some of them not only clearly believe it now but seem super excited now that they can't hand wave it away and they know Sony is actually doing it.
Why would you think that they'll do an upgrade in 2 years when they've waited 3 to do this one? It seems like 3 years would be the cadence they're on
Next Generation? I would prefer if we kept our cool here and reserved ourselves from using such phrasing that fuddle conversation and makes things seem larger than they really are.Polaris is GCN 1.3, it's not a revision but the next generation of Graphics Core Next. Liverpool (PS4) and Durango (XOne) are GCN 1.1 cores for comparison.
DF seems to think being polaris will give it a extra boost in performance. we really don't know much advantages polaris can offer being that it's new tech.
Well, will buy when it comes out.
Games in 4K though? Who would have thought.
Sony needs to hire some Nintendo ninjas to keep their projects secret.
That's not really a reason. Why should they care about their competition releasing new hardware with the sales that they have?
They don't need to touch the gaming capabilities for 4K content. Particularly because it's unlikely that any of the games are actually going to run in native 4K.
On top of that, while the documentation says that the hard drive will remain the same (Sony has several in circulation, so we assume it means 2.5-inch laptop drives generally) there are no indications of any changes to the Blu-ray drive. This is surprising, as we would have assumed that Sony would take this opportunity to support the new UHD 4K movie standard, supporting standard 50GB discs along with 66GB and 100GB variants. For now it seems that developers are set to stick with 50GB of storage.
Any and every multiplat game and multiple dev presentations at GDC and siggraph? Jaguar is slow and devs know it.
LODs and shadow settings in multiplatform games show this quite well.
Like the DF article states, I am not sure what this device accomplishes. Not enough for 4K perfect scale, not enough for a perfect scale to 60fps (CPU).
psychology. It happens because majority of people bought their PS4s one or two years ago, so many think PS4 is 2 years old.
Sony needs to hire some Nintendo ninjas to keep their projects secret.
Will the PS4K be released this year tho? If so, Nintendo could also use polaris for NX, as others stated it wouldn't.DF is saying the GPU is based off the new AMD tech, POLARIS, this thing will be a beast in a box.
2 years, 3 years, whatever, either way it's bad.
Console gaming should be (per platform) a single tier system, a two tier system is lose / lose for everyone, who do devs cater for?, the high classes or the plebs with their lowly vanilla PS4's? either way, one user base is likely to lose out.
It's a GTX 970 but in a fixed box. Should be pretty glorious.4.14TF? Fuck me, this thing is going to be an absolute beast.
psychology. It happens because majority of people bought their PS4s one or two years ago, so many think PS4 is 2 years old.
Hell, you can use a scaler chip to output 8k, doesn't make anything natively run at that resolution.
It Sony's going to claim games "run" at 4k I imagine a strong backlash will happen.
Probably either Fiji (1.2) or Polaris (1.3). Polaris lines up with the PS4k timeline though and being on 14nm makes it attractive for a console APU. The modest improvements on CPU and RAM mean more budget might go to a newer GPU design/node too.What's "improved GCN"? I doubt it's polaris.
I think he meant for BF possibly.Wait, PS4K at $349? 2x GPU, UHD bluray drive, just $349? How's that possible?
I'm starting to doubt whether I should get Uncharted 4 on PS4, tbh. I can enjoy 30fps games just fine, but playing Uncharted 4 with the visuals looking like they do now, at least, would be fucking great.
I mean, I enjoyed TLOU on PS3, but my experience with the PS4 version was far better.