Interfectum
Member
Nah, there'll just be another incremental hardware upgrade in two years.
There will probably not be a hardware reset again. Just buy a new PS4 every 6 years or so.
Nah, there'll just be another incremental hardware upgrade in two years.
From what I understand, there will not be two SKUs of PS4 games, there will be one PS4 game you buy and it will inherently include a standard and Neo mode?
That's perfectly fine IMO.
suggests that Sony and AMD have pushed the boat out, that they are using the upcoming Polaris technology.
So Neo boost it to 35 plus, which make it stable 30 lock.
Which is why this whole Kotaku rumor reeks of bullshit, they are claiming 4k gaming.
Imagine the price on a console that's going to run games at 4k. What's it gonna be 1000 bucks? lol Kotaku
Time to ban Kotaku.
Well, yeah. That's what I mean^^ Probably just some Kotaku pipe dream.
Slow news week/month/season probably.
lmao @ Kotaku basically lighting a fire of speculation and walking away. It will continue to burn until E3, where the entire discussion will likely be rendered moot (when nothing is relealed), because 'Sony doesn't comment on rumors'This is giving me 'Sony too!' of yore teas, tbh.
This is making me all misty-eyed for the time when Kotaku was banned.
Typical Kotaku nonsense. I do not believe this PS 4k gaming nonsense one second.
I can't believe how long this topic has ran with people actually thinking it could be true!
1) It's a Kotaku lie to generate ad revenue before they die.
2) People begged for a PSP with dual sticks and Sony refused because they know hardware revisions with different set ups split the user base.
TL'DR: Kotaku made it all up for click bait.
Guys, ps4.5 /ps4k is not true and is totally made up by kotaku to generate clicks.
Now Hulk Hogan has pretty much killed gawker and all its sites, they need to earn as much money as quick as they can.
This story is an ad revenue cash grab from Kotaku, and should not be taken seriously.
-----
Also expect more cash grab story's in the new few weeks from ALL gawker sites.
1) why do Sony need to make a statement every time Kotaku invents a story? If they did they would get nothing else done
2) "Clearly happening"? No. Not a single piece of evidence supports it.
No. Samsung's standalone 4K blu-ray player is $399 by itself. Base PS4 could hit $250 thoughPS4K - $350
PS4 - $250
Makes sense.
Wait, PS4K at $349? 2x GPU, UHD bluray drive, just $349? How's that possible?
DF is saying the GPU is based off the new AMD tech, POLARIS, this thing will be a beast in a box.
Just got my tax refund.
Way more than i thought, guess I'm getting a Neo.
So that weak CPU is confirmed now? LOL, you should have invested in a better CPU Sony.
Just made it tbhHow long have you had this post ready to roll? ;p
this if from the DF article, this could be a game changer.
Nice!
That could be huge, actually.this if from the DF article, this could be a game changer if true.
So that weak CPU is confirmed now? LOL, you should have invested in a better CPU Sony.
this if from the DF article, this could be a game changer if true.
That could be huge, actually.
Not surprised 4K Blu-ray isn't mentioned in the dev kit. Even if it's in there it won't be used by games.
Oh what the heck is going on with your avatar?
Wait, PS4K at $349? 2x GPU, UHD bluray drive, just $349? How's that possible?
I think they want to sell it at a profit at $399.
The PS4 I own was just a Beta system.
Die shrinks and the factories Sony uses will probably already be making normal Polaris GPUs for MSI, Gigabyte, etc which means pretty good yields and cheap for the factories since they will be routinely pushing those out.
Nah, there'll just be another incremental hardware upgrade in two years.
there are no indications of any changes to the Blu-ray drive. This is surprising, as we would have assumed that Sony would take this opportunity to support the new UHD 4K movie standard, supporting standard 50GB discs along with 66GB and 100GB variants. For now it seems that developers are set to stick with 50GB of storage.
Why do people keep saying two years? Is math really that hard? 2016 - 2013 = 2?
Does this part make sense? Shouldn't Sony be doing everything they can to support all forms of 4K disks?
Nah, there'll just be another incremental hardware upgrade in two years.
Yeah.
They may very well release PS5 two years later...
Trust me, I'm not a big fan of this myself. Being a teenager, it's often hard to convince your parents to buy you something new. Which is why I hope there is a nice trade in deal.
Why would this be a gamechanger?
If anything it means polaris is just another GCN-revision, which is arguably not too awesome.
Why would that be huge?
Our concern was that PS4's low-level APIs may not be compatible with the newer architecture, meaning problems running older games, but it seems that this is not an issue. And the good news here is that Polaris' efficiency improvements could add still further to the expected increase in performance. Certainly, we should expect to see cumulative improvements to memory compression, which should help us to get more out of the constricted 256-bit GDDR5 interface. To the best of our knowledge, there were no such technologies in place on the original PlayStation 4.
How will this work, standard on disc with Neo users downloading an update?
Sony seemingly acknowledges the need to integrate the two models of PlayStation 4 available simultaneously on the market - internally dubbed as 'Base' and 'Neo'. There will be no games exclusive to the Neo model, every title will be available on both, and there's no suggestion of VR-exclusive Neo modes at this point. Developers are prohibited from creating Neo-exclusive gameplay features, and enhancements are expected to be graphical and performance-based in nature. Gamers on both systems will be tied into the same ecosystem, meaning that users of both models will be competing against one another in online games. The user interface and PSN systems will also be identical.