I'm willing to take the switch tax.For real lol, publishers can't win in this scenario
No way I'm supporting this crap from WB.
I'm willing to take the switch tax.For real lol, publishers can't win in this scenario
As discussed plenty of times in other thread, the likes of Rime cost $10 more due to the cart prices. A $2-$4 increase in price for publisher means they need to increase price by $8-$10 to compensate for that increased charge.
I imagine we could either have
1) Full Game on a larger capacity cart costs $10 more than other versions, people pissed.
2) Part of game on cart, digital download required for rest, price parity, people pissed.
Out of all games a fucking Lego title comes with that type of caveat...lol ...
We will have to download 40gb of Fifa 18 data and 25gb for Skyrim because these publishers will be too cheap to use more expensive cards right ? lol
This is nonsense...
a) It should let you opt for lower-res movies.
b) It's particularly shitty to pull this on a kids' game.
Not sure if it ended up evolving into something else. But the problem most had was the fact that pulled that stunt and didn't just admit why. They hid behind some terrible excuse while they should've just been up front about it.Look at the Rime thread and you'll see what happens when a Switch game is priced at a higher price than the PS4 and X1 versions.
The drawbacks of game cards.
Might as well just put a download code inside.
Fake edit: Wait a fucking minute. The Switch eshop says the game is 7.1 GB.
This is a really gross precedent.
I was super interested in this and now I'm avoiding altogether. Lost a customer, WB.
Might as well just put a download code inside.
Fake edit: Wait a fucking minute. The Switch eshop says the game is 7.1 GB.
Guess I'm in the minority with a few others in here. I'd rather have pricing parity with all versions of the game instead of the "Nintendo tax" that many are griping about.
I look at it is a solid investment or my memory card for the Switch.
And I like collecting physical so I'll still buy the cartridge version.
It's not third party that decided to go with cartridges.Third Parties self-sabotaging their games on Nintendo consoles should just be expected at this point.Shame, because I was definitely going to buy this on the Switch.
This will affect sales massively. Online required on a 1 player game that's a physical release? Really?
Fine with this as long as it don't get the +10 Switch tax
I'm willing to take the switch tax.
No way I'm supporting this crap from WB.
The drawbacks of publishers being insanely greedy*.
The drawbacks of publishers being insanely greedy*.
I imagine this is a scenario where they either have the mandatory download, or price the game higher than the other platforms. They opted for the mandatory download. Why should they eat the cost on the Switch and make less per copy?
It's not third party that decided to go with cartridges.
Either accept this or switch tax.
We had a problem with them not giving us a straight answer on their prices.Look at the Rime thread and you'll see what happens when a Switch game is priced at a higher price than the PS4 and X1 versions.
Doomed either way.
Did they really think this would slide? First off this game is old as gramama. Second its a full priced upres port. Thirdly no one else is doing this at this stage of the Switch lifecycle. I guess they thought we'd be starved enough to allow it.
But they thought wrong.
BTW you are even legally allowed to sell a game that can't work without a update?
The drawbacks of publishers being insanely greedy*.
Why shitch players should deal with this bullshit?I imagine this is a scenario where they either have the mandatory download, or price the game higher than the other platforms. They opted for the mandatory download. Why should they eat the cost on the Switch and make less per copy?
I'm not too bothered by it but I don't think cartridge price is any reason to bump up the price of the game. If Dragon Quest Heroes 1+2 (a game only being sold in Japan) can warrant a 32GB game card then WB can with a worldwide release. They probably just want to keep costs as low as possible, which means inconveniencing the consumer. Something like this doesn't kill me interest in the game because, well, I want the game. But I do think WB are being very greedy.Guess I'm in the minority with a few others in here. I'd rather have pricing parity with all versions of the game instead of the "Nintendo tax" that many are griping about.
I look at it is a solid investment for my memory card for the Switch.
And I like collecting physical so I'll still buy the cartridge version.
I imagine this is a scenario where they either have the mandatory download, or price the game higher than the other platforms. They opted for the mandatory download. Why should they eat the cost on the Switch and make less per copy? Nintendo could step in and eat the cost for them, but they won't.
Literally unplayable if not connected to the internet? Damn'Internet required'
The drawbacks of game cards.
woooooooooooooooooooooow
it's 1996 all over again
Why shitch players should deal with this bullshit?