James Woods
Banned
Speaking of casting couches, Bay is motherfucking notorious...
I don't see what Bay did wrong because I simply don't believe a director would bother driving her out there himself when he could get an assistant to do it, and not tell her what she needed to do when shooting a commercial is $5,000 an hour. Its a story like Sigourney saying that David Fincher covered her with mud sand and lice for Alien 3 on the first day of shooting. Yeah he did because that was required to get the shot not because he has a hard on for dirty insect covered women.
Because it is the land of opportunity.IMO 17 is not really much creepier than 18ish for a full grown adult, BUT if there was force, doesn't matter the age, he should go to jail. Though, I am wondering why a lawsuit was filed against him instead of charges being brought against him.
Wonder what she had to do to get back in his good graces...
I mean ultimately it is still her decision to choose the life she wants, but the exploitation of women in the entertainment industry pretty much knows no bounds. Extreme degrees of seduction and pressure that few are cut out for period.
I don't know how to feel about this. On the one hand, Singer seems to be a sleaze. But on the other, the kid is 17 years old and and old enough to understand what he's getting into.
Neither do legal adults for probably the first 10 years of their legal adulthood. Generally speaking.I don't think 17 year olds have the greatest judgment.
TeeheeAccording to maybe real but maybe fake Robert Downey Jr's online pseudonym a bunch of child molestation happens in hollywood. Not at all surprising, y'know, since a bunch of child molestation happens FUCKING EVERYWHERE.
It's probably just as likely to happen with the person you think is really awesome and personable as it is to happen from the stereotypical nerdy looking balding guy with coke bottle glasses, fans of sexualized little girl anime aside.
that guy is 25
seriously im the first one to lit the torch if all this crap is true but I feel a lot of people see a situation involving two gay people with a somewhat big age difference and instantly think "CREEPY PEDO OMG" when it's nowhere near the same case if we're talking about heterosexuals
it's really weird to see
To be fair, that boy looks 14. I agree with your post though.that guy is 25
seriously im the first one to lit the torch if all this crap is true but I feel a lot of people see a situation involving two gay people with a somewhat big age difference and instantly think "CREEPY PEDO OMG" when it's nowhere near the same case if we're talking about heterosexuals
it's really weird to see
I don't know how to feel about this. On the one hand, Singer seems to be a sleaze. But on the other, the kid is 17 years old and and old enough to understand what he's getting into.
Of all the dumb things in this thread that is the dumbest.In the gay community, it's really not rare for 50+ year olds to pursue entirely willing barely-legal boys. It's creepy until you realize that it's a mutual attraction thing and not the equivalent of an old dude perving on teen girls. You just kinda have to see it to see the difference.
Of all the dumb things in this thread that is the dumbest.
If barely legal guys can be genuinely attracted to 50+ year old men then barely legal girls can be attracted to 50+ year old men.
It is EXACTLY like an old dude perving on teen girls.
Creeps don't get a free pass for being gay.
Seriously. Talk about double standards.Of all the dumb things in this thread that is the dumbest.
If barely legal guys can be genuinely attracted to 50+ year old men then barely legal girls can be attracted to 50+ year old men.
It is EXACTLY like an old dude perving on teen girls.
Creeps don't get a free pass for being gay.
If exploiting a power imbalance is wrong then it is wrong for gays too.
As long as both parties are actually willing I don't think anyone deserves to be called a creep though.
A 17-year-old is not a child, sorry. This is irrelevant if sexual coercion really did occur, of course. But still, it's ludicrous to call a 17-year-old a child on the basis of an arbitrary law.
Yeah, the guy obviously likes them young but as long as they are consenting adults, who cares.
Ughh...even if this true, I hope this won't affect X-Men DOFP too much.
Of all the dumb things in this thread that is the dumbest.
If barely legal guys can be genuinely attracted to 50+ year old men then barely legal girls can be attracted to 50+ year old men.
It is EXACTLY like an old dude perving on teen girls.
Creeps don't get a free pass for being gay.
If exploiting a power imbalance is wrong then it is wrong for gays too.
Of all the dumb things in this thread that is the dumbest.
If barely legal guys can be genuinely attracted to 50+ year old men then barely legal girls can be attracted to 50+ year old men.
It is EXACTLY like an old dude perving on teen girls.
Creeps don't get a free pass for being gay.
If exploiting a power imbalance is wrong then it is wrong for gays too.
You're so deep and interesting. Tell us more.Don't worry it will still be meaningless easily digestible action-filled banal popcorn crap like every other comicbook / superhero movie.
But, as this suit states, they're not consenting adults.
You're so deep and interesting. Tell us more.
It's obviously bad if Singer forcibly raped this guy, but I don't see the problem with other stories about him asking people for dick, provided they are the age of consent.
comic films are fluffy as shit bro. you don't have to be a snob to think so.
Kind of funny too that you'd hear these stories and think "maybe that's part of why he didn't come back even after Superman Returns was finished!" But nope, he came back for at least one more.Ivysaur posted in here kind of confirming this shit which means it's probably true, which I am more than ready to accept, but it also totally bums me out.
And I'm still sitting here thinking "I'm probably still going to go see that new X-Men movie"
Fuck.
I think some of us heard about that sort of stuff and consciously or subconsciously thought it'd be better now.ITT: People who are just now learning how Hollywood has worked since the 1920s.
ITT: People who are just now learning how Hollywood has worked since the 1920s.
Reading this thread....yikes. Knew Hollywood was full of scum but disappointing to learn this is leaning towards true.
I think some of us heard about that sort of stuff and consciously or not hoped it'd be better now.
Next people will be shocked to learn their favorite politician/religious leader is a sexual deviant behind closed doors!
My post was poorly worded. The law isn't arbitrary, the specific age of consent is. You're absolutely right that for practicality's sake we have to draw all sorts of lines. What I meant was that a one-size-fits-all age of consent is next to worthless for evaluating an individual's intellectual maturity. Some teenagers are dumb as a stack of Oreos and need to be protected from themselves, others are fully capable and self-sufficient. This natural variance can be overshadowed by the very broad generalizations implicit in the age of consent.We draw lines in the sand all the time because we have to. We have decided, for a variety of reasons, that 18 is the age of majority. It's not arbitrary, it's a necessity.
Bryan Singer is old enough to know that he should not have sex with a 17 year old, yet made that decision to do so.
Next people will be shocked to learn their favorite politician/religious leader is a sexual deviant behind closed doors!
Well, it's why I said subconsciously; "but that was the past, surely it's better now right!?" Even though if you stop to think about it the proverb would hold true about how the more things change the more they stay the same. I guess people just hope it doesn't include people they actually give a damn about.Next people will be shocked to learn their favorite politician/religious leader is a sexual deviant behind closed doors!
Don't worry it will still be meaningless easily digestible action-filled banal popcorn crap like every other comicbook / superhero movie.
You're so deep and interesting. Tell us more.
This actually reminds me of how Bryan Singer basically kickstarted this whole thing by doing a reasonably entertaining adaptation after a long string of poor ones, and this time it seems he started the trend rather than creating an exception. Figures really.What more is there to say, they're fucking awful, about on par with video game stories. Maybe one day a director will take on something of value like Maus but for now it's am endless stream of superhero franchises pumping out the same old junk every summer.
lol
I do wonder though what this means for the future of FOX comic book films. Singer will get what's coming to him if allegations are true, but this could mean much more for the film franchise.
It's obnoxious, but you just don't get it. You have to see it.
This power-imbalance thing doesn't really exist here. You see it on Bear websites or stuff like Grindr. It's a mutually sought after thing, where as in the straight community, you find it be far less common and far more predatory.
I could flip open a tab and find a dozen 20 something year old men actively seeking 50+ year old "daddies", because that's their legitimate desire. I don't think the same sub-community exists with women. You can call that a double standard, I think it's more of a cultural difference. I hardly believe the women are incapable of it, just that it doesn't exist to near the same degree of prevalence.
Well, there's the angle of offering these favors of getting into the business or whatever. It's pretty unsavory at best whether it's with younger men or younger women, and in fact I really don't think I'd feel much differently regardless of the sexes involved.I agree with what SalsaShark has been saying.
I would wait for proof of a coerced act, rather than just shame the dude for consensual sexual behavior that you happen to find creepy. It may make you uncomfortable that he's into young-looking dudes, but as long as it takes place between consenting adults, you shouldn't treat it as evidence that a rape took place.
It's obnoxious, but you just don't get it. You have to see it.
This power-imbalance thing doesn't really exist here. You see it on Bear websites or stuff like Grindr. It's a mutually sought after thing, where as in the straight community, you find it be far less common and far more predatory.
I could flip open a tab and find a dozen 20 something year old men actively seeking 50+ year old "daddies", because that's their legitimate desire. I don't think the same sub-community exists with women. You can call that a double standard, I think it's more of a cultural difference. I hardly believe the women are incapable of it, just that it doesn't exist to near the same degree of prevalence.