the fact that you are posting here means the patch would not affect you.
this "outrage" is ridiculous
A lot of people who buy physical is not just a preference, it's because their internet connection is not up to digital downloads, be it from connection speed or data caps.
People can't send you Steam games in a care package. One of the biggest advantages consoles have always had over PC since Atari 2600 was "plug and play". Why get a console if it's as BS to deal with as a PC when a PC is cheaper for gaming. (Do the math, a $1200 PC with free online and $40 games is way cheaper overall than a $400-$500 console with $5 per month online and $60 games)
Not everyone buys physical copies just because of poor speed, etc. I buy physical copies of games because I'm guaranteed to play the games that I bought years down the road for nostalgia.
The only time I buy a game that's digital is if they're digitally exclusive (like some indie games, & other games like Mega Man 9 & 10, Dust: An Elysian Tail, etc., as well as other games from PSN/XBLA).
Not everyone buys physical copies just because of digital or that they have poor speed, etc. I buy physical copies of games because I'm guaranteed to play the games that I bought years down the road for nostalgia.
The only time I buy a game that's digital is if they're digitally exclusive (like some indie games, & other games like Mega Man 9 & 10, Dust: An Elysian Tail, etc., as well as other games from PSN/XBLA).
You were forced to download those updates in order to play it offline?
Really, I don't think day1 dlc warrants an exhaustive discussion that culminates in the inevitable tinfoil hat theorizing and conspiracy. What's funny is, this strategy does give the devs the benefit of more time, so I'm willing to take a wait and see approach. Besides, it's not like they aren't going to release a 'special edition' with all the dlc 3-6 months later
Regardless, I think if your Internet is an issue, you shouldn't have to bend over backwards to accommodate Microsoft. I'd invest in a PS4 or Wiiu.
I may be wrong but usually the poeple who purchase physical do that because :
In the first case there's no point at all to pay for the disk.
- They don't want to download the game, they want to play directly from the disk
- They keep collection of the games purchased
The second case we may argue, but I think that it's better for them to just for the disk with the complete content (it will happen eventually)
completely reasonable jumpI still wonder how this game will actually play. Since it's obvious they're not even done with getting the game functional on the disc, I wonder how much of that demo build will differ from the finished product. Do we have another Aliens Colonial Marines on our hands where a hand-built demo completely misrepresents an upcoming product?
the fact that you are posting here means the patch would not affect you.
this "outrage" is ridiculous
Because without it at launch xbone bundles wouldn't sell. Oh wait.... how much will they cost? 699$?Why not just delay it?
That's changing, though. Online elements are being added to nearly all games, and developers are doing this on purpose (Ubisoft seems to be a big culprit of this, but Bungie is no better, really). MS pushed it along before it happened naturally, though, and I do think they were wrong for that.
Sorry, I fail to see how this is even worth getting worked up over. Fairly certain they are doing this to maximize content, you will be able to play while downloading. In a sense it's not so different then buying a steam key or sitting through a mandatory install. Really, at some point, people are looking to complain about anything, and it's getting tiresome.
Ms has made it fairly clear from the start that XB1 is a connected console. It's the only aspect of their message that hasn't been a murky, convoluted mess. If your Internet is so shitty or inconsistent, in all seriousness, you should stay away. You will not have a good experience.
What? It doesn't say that at all. It says you can play while it's downloading at a certain point.
I still wonder how this game will actually play. Since it's obvious they're not even done with getting the game functional on the disc, I wonder how much of that demo build will differ from the finished product. Do we have another Aliens Colonial Marines on our hands where a hand-built demo completely misrepresents an upcoming product?
I find it laughable that the usual suspects in this thread are suggesting that a complete version of the game might come out at a later date that you can purchase again. So people are honestly suggesting with a strait face to buy 2 copies of this game just so you can get the complete product you paid for without being at the mercy of someone flicking a switch to make it worthless. That is gross and very indicative of the way this industry has conditioned people. I remember buying a product and getting it home and using it until I grew tired of it and put it away to be played at a later date, or I knew didn't want it anymore and sold it. There was no 3rd party dictating those terms to me.
And that's one of the reasons why I liked gaming before Microsoft came along & would love for Microsoft to get out of the gaming industry & to be replaced with another competitor. Heck, I would rather have Sega back in the hardware business, & both the Sega Genesis/Mega Drive & Dreamcast were good systems.
Microsoft's the devil of the gaming industry & have done nothing good for gamers. Pushing people to pay for online multiplayer, getting them to accept DRM, etc. It's ridiculous.
yup if you narrow your view to what they have done that you think is wrong.And that's one of the reasons why I liked gaming before Microsoft came along & would love for Microsoft to get out of the gaming industry & to be replaced with another competitor. Heck, I would rather have Sega back in the hardware business, & both the Sega Genesis/Mega Drive & Dreamcast were good systems.
They've done nothing good for gamers. Pushing people to pay for online, accept DRM, etc. It's ridiculous.
Good thing its free Download....
If it wasnt...I dont dare to imagine what would have happened here.
yup if you narrow your view to what they have done that you think is wrong.
At the same time ignoring all of the innovations they have brought to gaming. They have pretty much forced their competition to improve their extremely crappy online infrastructure, provided various features first that have now been adopted industry wide. But hey its M$
Except it's not. You get a worse experience that's for sure, but it is a working game.Let me ask you this question: Are you playing GT5 without patches..?
I'd say patching Polyphonys games is more or less mandatory.
Are there any other games at launch for Xbox One that require a day 1 patch to play the game? Is Forza the only one?
Could you have just cancelled the updates and played the game normally?I decided to pop in GT5 two days ago for the first time since... almost launch and I had 13 fucking updates to download just to play the game. At least 1GB worth. Then a required 2GB install before I could even play. Was this a big deal? No. Will this Forza 5 download be a big deal? No.
Are there any other games at launch for Xbox One that require a day 1 patch to play the game? Is Forza the only one?
Are there any other games at launch for Xbox One that require a day 1 patch to play the game? Is Forza the only one?
Be outraged gaf, this is such a huge deal. Think of all the hassle this will cause.
So how many people posting in this online forum don't have Internet?
Including at home or tethering.
Just curious.
kickstarter maybe?Pretty sure it's at least 75% of NeoGAF. We should really organize a money-raising benefit for them.
Who is buying 500 buck consoles and has no access to the internet?
kickstarter maybe?
Sega would have chosen the same route as MS if they existed in the same form today, or did you not see their Dreamcast online push? If you want to blame anyone, blame Apple. Their success with Itunes got this whole thing started.
My PS3 is hooked up to the 65" LED TV we have in our living room, it's nowhere near a router or wired access point. It works fine because the PS3 has built in wifi.
Guess what happens when I plug my 360 into that TV? I have to play offline. And it works.
Is it really hard to imagine someone in my situation but without a decent wifi connection? Setting up wifi is a mystery to people.
Don't make bullshit assumptions.
My PS3 is hooked up to the 65" LED TV we have in our living room, it's nowhere near a router or wired access point. It works fine because the PS3 has built in wifi.
Guess what happens when I plug my 360 into that TV? I have to play offline. And it works.
Is it really hard to imagine someone in my situation but without a decent wifi connection? Setting up wifi is a mystery to people.
Don't make bullshit assumptions.
Care to back that up with a quote? Here are a few quotes stating the opposite,Article says it should be playable out of box, while content is downloading. Majority of posters have missed this detail? Not sure how much outrage I should express.
IGN said:will require a one-time connection to Xbox Live before you can play
Greenawalt said:when you first boot up the game, were going to ask you to log in
Greenawalt said:that is required content to play the game
IGN said:requiring part of the game as a download on launch day
IGN said:what you get on the disc you buy at the store wont be the entire game. Youll need to download the rest of it
Funny you'd say that...are you surprised. Its a Microsoft associated thread were not reading the entire article or simply ignoring parts of it becomes a requirement.
Care to back that up with a quote? Here are a few quotes stating the opposite.
"Youll need to download the rest of it from Xbox Live (which should be possible to occur as you play, Greenawalt clarified)."
Right from the OP.
This isn't what people are saying... They are noting for people who cannot download this day 1 they'll probably be able to wait a month or two and buy the game then and second run copies will have the "DLC" built in. This seems like just a launch timeframe issue.
Care to back that up with a quote? Here are a few quotes stating the opposite,
.
I buy most of my games physical for one reason: price. Physical is usually cheaper.
But it was obvious why they had the check in. When you have all of your games (Retail or digital) tied to your online account, in order to support trade ins, lending, etc (Something no digital service currently offers) you have to have a way to check if the game is still tied to that account otherwise people would be able to take advantage of that time lapse and could potentially keep a game after trading it in.
Most people just couldn't understand that and freaked out. Just like an iPad is useless without internet (Whether internet on the device itself or the computer that you connect it to) the XB1 was the same.
21 pages of arguing this is literally embarrassing.
Edit: 22!