He seemed to pass a lot of this shit off as 'fake news' type-thing (like saying Irish people were not discriminated against), so I expect he'd just double down on that.
Yeah, I suppose that's what I should expect - again, it ties back to the notion I mentioned a few posts ago that I'm seeing frequent pushbacks against accusations of racism by citing facts, and working to the premise that their entire belief is *only* about those facts, not due to any prejudice - but without doing due diligence to test the veracity of those facts (or indeed, whether they're true in isolation but omit key extra information that casts the conclusions in a different light. And so then it turns around into "Look, you're denying the reality we all live in!"
(And I have to acknowledge the catch-22 in here, we've got to go to great pains to not make the same fundamental error in the opposite direction)
I said ages ago that one of the reasons I like to believe I turned out just-about okay was through secondary school history lessons, which - as a major component - was a lot of instruction as to how to reasonably read and interpret historical sources, asking the fundamental W questions (who's produced this source, why did they produce this source, what are they saying, that sort of thing), look for signs of bias, and then take and analyse information from it and compare with other sources on the same broad subject. I've said a few times that I think that sort of training, in schools, would be a great grounding for kids
beyond history, because that same skillset absolutely applies today.