"American police are scum". How much clearer does that have to be? It's a general statement alright, and that's a sum of whole statement.
You want to talk about nonsense? I was quoting the typical "nonsense" I see. Don't need to make excuses for others like that. It is what it is. They could have easily said, this cop was scum, or those involved directly were scum. They didn't.
I'm tired of this really. GAF likes to act like the majority of LEO are scum. When in reality, it's more likely that most are not imho. My best friend who is a Trooper talked down a kid who was under mental distress and pointing a shotgun right at him. He could have easily shot him and it would have been justified. In fact he probably should have. He rolled the dice with his own life there which could have easily went wrong. So knock off the games.
Why is it that my father is an ex police officer, and I understand it to mean that he is talking about the bad police in reference to the story in the OP? Is he talking about my father specifically? No, You know why I know that? Because he was a good cop. Not a dickhead, like your friend. (As in he isn't a dickhead, like your friend isn't a dickhead) So why do you even assume t hat your friend would be lumped into the general statement about murderers?
I don't have a bullshit game to play with semantics and generalizing in a thread where yet another police officer, has killed a person. You have an agenda because you have an anecdote. You're taking it personally to mean that its all police, and you have to come rushing in with your flag of deeper understanding of generalization. You're making an issue where there isn't one. There is a difference in stating that all american police are scum, versus a general comment about the state of police in regard to killing civilians.
General statements are General statements. You're understanding what he wrote as all. I understand it as a general statement that speaks to the systematic problem with police iin our country that we are currently facing.
In the future, what you should do, is to ask for clarification if the poster means all, or if they are just speaking in general. Because there is a general problem with the police, which my sheriff friends, as well as father, well understand. In fact, my dad has been the one thats kept me alive. He tells me that the force is different, the attitude is different. That it is in my best interest to avoid police when I can. And he says that now as a Judge. Our family is friends with the chiefs of police, we frequent events with police, we go to funerals. These aren't the cops that are creating the problem, and aren't the cops that are considered scum, because they aren't.
Anecdotes to anecdotes means fuck all. There is a palpable problem with the justice system and police abuse. This is why the justice department is investigating New Mexico for example, because their cops are out of control. In general, NM police have lost their fucking minds. This isn't to say that there aren't good police there, unless it is said that every single NM police officer is a bad one.
If I had a time machine and saw the Jury's verdict I'll be sure to let you know.
and to that person calling Christopher Dorner an American hero, you're disgusting.
That is the problem that people have with police punishment. You can't seem to see it. This isn't about your prognostication powers, its about the trend that police don't go to jail for sure bets - that would be sure bets for any civilian. No wrong doing is found often. Its up in the air for the officer, it could go either way. He strangled someone to death, on video. He needs to be fired, and charged. Just as anyone else would be.
Which is why people comment about the police and their ability to evade punishment for killing people. Some gaf-hive mind indeed.
And agreed, whoever said that dorner is a hero is horrible for saying it.