Somebody is waiting for this to upgrade his room...
![]()
Only a step away from this
![wow2030.jpg](http://www.mavav.org/2006/11/02/wow2030.jpg)
...how we will all live once VR takes over...
Somebody is waiting for this to upgrade his room...
![]()
Considering the Rift is going to work natively with W10, I would expect it to be rather easy to get it to run on X1. Wouldn't be surprised if they announce that at E3.
I believe the reason why people are reacting the way they are because this is REALLY niche. This feature isn't something that casuals are going to shell out money for.
Considering the Rift is going to work natively with W10, I would expect it to be rather easy to get it to run on X1. Wouldn't be surprised if they announce that at E3.
Hold on, people are actually looking forward to VR so they can watch movies in a virtual theatre?
I just don't know anymore.
Hold on, people are actually looking forward to VR so they can watch movies in a virtual theatre?
I just don't know anymore.
Hold on, people are actually looking forward to VR so they can watch movies in a virtual theatre?
I just don't know anymore.
Only a step away from this
![]()
...how we will all live once VR takes over...
So wait,
So you u need an x1, rift plus a nice pc to eh simulate playing on a big tv?
Is this correct?
It's not a bad idea, to be able to play a 2d game on a big virtual screen. It just seems weird that they're partnering with MS to do this with the Xbox One. I wonder why they don't just let you do it with an HDMI signal from any device.
PS4 will get this feature for sure as they have Gaikai tech for streaming games, Remote and Share play already so its easy and basic for them to have. Also we get to see the output of the user using headset in TV so its kind of already exists.
So I guess I can simulate having an absolutely massive tv?
Hold on, people are actually looking forward to VR so they can watch movies in a virtual theatre?
I just don't know anymore.
i think we all completely understandDo you even understand the difference. The scale of the thing completely changes to what ever you want it to be.
Have a virtual 300ft screen, scaled to some random non native resolution on a low poly rendered 3d model of the moon if you want - the feeling of being there with that sort of scale is cool.
this could be done in many different ways....Sync with other people around the world if you want and be in the same space when hundreds of miles apart. It's just one small opportunity rather than the big selling point
Wouldn't the hardcore just shell out money for larger screens to display their games instead going for a virtual option?
Exactly. I don't understand why people would think what we saw is the entire collaboration. Makes zero sense. They get no positive PR from what they showed. They showed that the three can work hand in hand, OR will be on W10, XBO will be W10 am I the only one who can connect the dots that there is something more than what we have seen.
MS isn't going all in on OR, but they can ride the coattails of a product that has mindshare on PC and the backing of Facebook. If they can get anything out of it, its a smart move and they didn't have to fund the R&D like Morpheus.
Unless Sony releases Morpheus on PC, they are kinda locked into the PS4 ecosystem.
Looool what is the point of this??
![]()
Don't get excited lol
So I guess I can simulate having an absolutely massive tv?
Or playing on this screenImagine playing IN THIS ROOM
Gamechanger!
Ah good point, I forgot about that.I'm guessing it's because of the Windows 10 integration. Streaming will already be an MS thing for Windows 10 so it's probably easy to implement into that into their (possibly preexisting?) virtual movie theater.
From everything we've seen the Xbox One won't be able to run OR stuff. The PC specs were pretty steep.
It's not a bad idea, to be able to play a 2d game on a big virtual screen. It just seems weird that they're partnering with MS to do this with the Xbox One. I wonder why they don't just let you do it with an HDMI signal from any device.
Doesn't a lot of it depend on what is being developed for it? OR is obviously interested in games, but the main reason FB wanted them was for the social/travel aspect. This stuff is essentially filmed and not quite as difficult to process as a game, correct?
Does anyone actually believe that the collaboration with MS revolves entirely around the controller and the ability to project your game from XBO to PC to OR? I get the sense that the ability to do something like that is in the early stage of what they are looking for.
Seems like there is no point in mentioning it, if thats all there was.
Considering a 1080p 120 inch projector is about 1/4 the price of an oculus+PC I'd say your money priorities are a bit off.
Ha-ha exactly how I feel, I wouldn't be surprised to read this on April 1I feel like there's an important part of this story missing because this honestly looks like the dumbest things I've ever seen.
Exactly. I don't understand why people would think what we saw is the entire collaboration. Makes zero sense. They get no positive PR from what they showed. They showed that the three can work hand in hand, OR will be on W10, XBO will be W10 am I the only one who can connect the dots that there is something more than what we have seen.
MS isn't going all in on OR, but they can ride the coattails of a product that has mindshare on PC and the backing of Facebook. If they can get anything out of it, its a smart move and they didn't have to fund the R&D like Morpheus.
Unless Sony releases Morpheus on PC, they are kinda locked into the PS4 ecosystem.
You get to play on a...70"+++ virtual tv?
This shit is depressing, because you know there will be cases similar to this. I mean we already have shut ins, but you have to wonder if the immersion of VR will make it worse and really disconnect people from reality.
Why just a big TV? Why not a movie theater, a beach, a mountain top, the bridge of the USS Enterprise. Imagine playing Alien Isolation onboard the Nostromo with ambient sounds and the Alien occasionally coming into the room. People need to use their imagination with this. I suppose they could have demoed it better.
For streaming games or movies, yes it will be fine.
For rendering games though? That's gonna be very hard. OR specs are:
Resolution = 2160 x 1200
Fps = 90HZ
That's would need a lot of processing power even for very simple games.
instead of playing forza on her xbox one on her tv in her room, the woman streams the xbox one game to her pc and puts on the oculus rift so she can watch her avatar sit in a room playing xbox one on the virtual screen in the room
Completely agree. I just think the first part is the first big step in VR anyway. If there wasn't more here, why even bother collaborating? The me too thought process from some in here doesn't make sense, unless they had other ideas for it.
couldn't you just turn the lights out and sit closer to your current TV?
So MS can say that it has VR support in 1080p, I'm guessing.What the fuck is the point of this?
Do you even understand the difference. The scale of the thing completely changes to what ever you want it to be. Have a 300ft screen on the moon if you want - the feeling of being there with that sort of scale is cool. Sync with other people around the world if you want and be in the same space when hundreds of miles apart. It's just one small opportunity rather than the big selling point
I guess ill just play traditional games on my tv and use the rift for vr games.
I dont need no chumps playing volleyball on the beach while im trying to play the witcher.