Maybe Nintendo should have called it the " Nintendo E3 Digital Press Conference"...it would be trickier to push the Nintendo skipping E3 line then. ;p
Sounds like a good idea!
Maybe Nintendo should have called it the " Nintendo E3 Digital Press Conference"...it would be trickier to push the Nintendo skipping E3 line then. ;p
I took a class on Persuasion for my BA in Psychology and the press conference argument seems to be mostly a resistance to change/appeal to tradition bias. "This is the way it has always been done and therefor it is the correct way to do things." The problem with this line of thinking is that you never explore other possibilities and may never find out that the traditional way of doing things isn't as effective as other ways of doing the same thing. It's possible that the way you are doing things is the best way, but "because that's the way we've always done it" isn't a good reason and can blind people from better alternatives to the point that they will staunchly refuse to acknowledge a better or equally as good way.
"I can't possibly get excited about something on my own, I need herd mentality to do it for me."
You've heard the people in this thread, Nintendo. And what they want is less game content, more bluster and performances by Usher.
Right, now when we have the exact time there can be a countdown:The Reggie moment with him saying "forget about it, I'm just going home" was brilliant.
To think in a month (and a bit), a new Zelda...
sörine;109939216 said:I saw that, I meant more from SPD1 and Retro specifically which you put in the never section. A new Metroid will be coming from there.
I think we could see another EAD5 co-production sneak in too since that's all they seem to be doing now (Star Fox with Q-Games, Steel Diver with Vitei, Wii Fit with Ganbarion). Not sure what, I'd love Star Fox or F-Zero but probably not.
There's also the possibility of more 3rd party pickups, especially on 3DS. You mentioned Bravely Second but I think Layton Vs AA, Fantasy Life, Puzzle & Dragons Z, DQVII and some others probably have a shot.
Weren't they meant to be showing off a new NFC game? I think that's one of things that Iwata said at the last briefing.
I'm already seeing "Nintendo are skipping E3 again!" posts on other, dedicated gaming forums. Subsequent posters fully believe it too
lol
Titles we know are in the works that could show up at E3:
- Super Smash Bros. (WiiU/3DS)
- The Legend of Zelda (WiiU)
- Sonic Boom (3DS/WiiU)
- Hyrule Warriors (WiiU)
- Monolith Soft's X (WiiU)
- Bayonetta 2 (WiiU)
- Fatal Frame (WiiU)
- Yarn Yoshi (WiiU)
- SMT x Fire Emblem (WiiU) *
- Pokken Fighters (WiiU?)
- Pikachu detective title (3DS) **
* Might be on hold due to Atlus shenanigans?
** The one with the horrifying Pikachu facial tech
Titles that seem like safe possibilities?
- Nintendo Land 2 (WiiU)
- Wii Sports U (WiiU)
- Paper Mario (WiiU)
- Animal Crossing (WiiU)
- Kirby platformer (WiiU)
- Mario Party (WiiU)
- Mario & Sonic at the World Cup (WiiU/3DS)
- Majora's Mask 3D (3DS)
What else?
I prefer Nintendo Directs to the live events. They are able to cram more info into less time and for me sitting at home, it's a higher quality presentation. But even if you prefer the old format, I don't see how it matters enough to be legitmately disappointed. You're getting the same info either way.
Titles we know are in the works that could show up at E3:
- Super Smash Bros. (WiiU/3DS)
- The Legend of Zelda (WiiU)
- Sonic Boom (3DS/WiiU)
- Hyrule Warriors (WiiU)
- Monolith Soft's X (WiiU)
- Bayonetta 2 (WiiU)
- Fatal Frame (WiiU)
- Yarn Yoshi (WiiU)
- SMT x Fire Emblem (WiiU) *
- Pokken Fighters (WiiU?)
- Pikachu detective title (3DS) **
* Might be on hold due to Atlus shenanigans?
** The one with the horrifying Pikachu facial tech
Titles that seem like safe possibilities?
- Nintendo Land 2 (WiiU)
- Wii Sports U (WiiU)
- Paper Mario (WiiU)
- Animal Crossing (WiiU)
- Kirby platformer (WiiU)
- Mario Party (WiiU)
- Mario & Sonic at the World Cup (WiiU/3DS)
- Majora's Mask 3D (3DS)
What else?
You can't really blame them considering that many big gaming websites have essentially led with that headline for today's announcements. The media go with that falsehood and people buy into it.
E3 is not just about the info, it's about the experience. Like live concerts. You can hear the same song on your music player but seeing the person, and the show adds something special.
Nintendo Directs are utter and completely grating. Iwata should not be doing them as he is a terrible presenter.
Most of the people who watch the conferences aren't there in personE3 is not just about the info, it's about the experience. Like live concerts. You can hear the same song on your music player but seeing the person, and the show adds something special.
Nintendo Directs are utter and completely grating. Iwata should not be doing them as he is a terrible presenter.
E3 is not just about the info, it's about the experience. Like live concerts. You can hear the same song on your music player but seeing the person, and the show adds something special.
Nintendo Directs are utter and completely grating. Iwata should not be doing them as he is a terrible presenter.
This list highlights how little I care about Nintendo's games any more. I am interested to see Zelda, and I'd like to see a Wii U Animal Crossing because the game sounds interesting but I don't play handhelds. That's it.
If at this E3, they have NintendoLand 2 and nothing else, your hunch was valid.
I don't think they are going to have 5 new first party IPs but to think they'll just have Zelda and everything else shown what we already know of...I don't buy.
They'll have a few surprises...their impact to be determined.
I guess it's your right to say they are slowly weening out the Wii U but until there is any evidence of that(and there has been none so far from the people that actually make that call), it doesn't mean much.
People could think Nintendo is the dumbest company of all time but they call their own shots, "popular" opinion on messageboards doesn't.
Titles that seem like safe possibilities?
- Nintendo Land 2 (WiiU)
- Wii Sports U (WiiU)
- Paper Mario (WiiU)
- Animal Crossing (WiiU)
- Kirby platformer (WiiU)
- Mario Party (WiiU)
- Mario & Sonic at the World Cup (WiiU/3DS)
- Majora's Mask 3D (3DS)
What else?
E3 is not just about the info, it's about the experience. Like live concerts. You can hear the same song on your music player but seeing the person, and the show adds something special.
Nintendo Directs are utter and completely grating. Iwata should not be doing them as he is a terrible presenter.
Rösti;109998781 said:Right, now when we have the exact time there can be a countdown:
Where did I say they would show Nintendo Land 2 lol ?...
I personally think all they have (new software wise for WiiU) is the new Zelda and that's why they are not bothering with a press conference. Sure there will be new Smash character reveals and new footage of Bayo 2 and X aswell but we have seen these games several times now including at last years E3.
Do you honestly expect Nintendo to plough a ton of money into new exclusive WiiU games when every single WiiU game outside of the two Mario games has barely sold 1 million copies ?.
WiiU is a complete failure and will struggle to hit 15 million sales. Nintendo will show off what they have in development for it at E3 and then start to take attention away from it with QoL later in 2014, the new handheld in 2015 and the next console in 2016.
Where did I say they would show Nintendo Land 2 lol ?...
No, its hosted at the Verizon theater, where press conferences are held, not in the conference center.
It's available here as far as I know. The public version at http://www.mapyourshow.com/shows/index.cfm?show_id=e314 isn't available yet.Do we have the floor plan for this year's E3?
You didn't nor did I say you did, it was a figurative example using that title because everyone brings up the "one more thing NintendoLand fireworks" as being abysmal.
As far as the games are concerned, Miyamoto is said to be working on a new IP, EAD Tokyo are working on another Mario, Retro is working on something new, etc...
None of these are guaranteed to be at the show but even with Zelda and more of every game they have already showed, there'll be enough games for everyone.
They're not ditching the Wii U.
If they were, Zelda would be a no-show like some think it will be.
Rösti;110003695 said:It's available here as far as I know. The public version at http://www.mapyourshow.com/shows/index.cfm?show_id=e314 isn't available yet.
Nintendo will have three booths this year: 4822, OFMR 5244 and OFMR 5644Thank you.But we do know that this year, they will have even more/bigger booths, compared to last year?
Fair enough. If Nintendo has a big budget Metroid, a new 3D Mario and a new Miyamoto IP all for WiiU on top of Zelda U and the other games we have already seen then I don't think there's a chance they would not have a big press conference to showcase all of those titles. That line up is just as strong as anything Sony or MS will show.
I think Retro's project and the next 3D Mario will be launch titles for their next console, they will not want another drought without big name titles like with 3DS and WiiU. A new Mario and Metroid at launch combined with a port of Zelda U would give the next console an extremely strong start.
I personally hope you are right but I just can't see it.
I took a class on Persuasion for my BA in Psychology and the press conference argument seems to be mostly a resistance to change/appeal to tradition bias. "This is the way it has always been done and therefor it is the correct way to do things." The problem with this line of thinking is that you never explore other possibilities and may never find out that the traditional way of doing things isn't as effective as other ways of doing the same thing. It's possible that the way you are doing things is the best way, but "because that's the way we've always done it" isn't a good reason and can blind people from better alternatives to the point that they will staunchly refuse to acknowledge a better or equally as good way.
The press obviously has a bias in this affair because they have a lot more to gain from being middlemen presenting information that Nintendo could more effectively present directly to their current and potential customers. All of those headlines are good clickbait and set their readers up to believe that Nintendo's current E3 strategies are bad without ever giving them a chance. They're preying on peoples' resistance to change by reporting Nintendo's plans with negative headlines. Nintendo should work with the press but they shouldn't be beholden to them like this.
What if Human Head Wii U project was Metroid? That way they could have Metroid for Wii U this year. Having already developed games like Prey they could totally do it.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=657985
I took a class on Persuasion for my BA in Psychology and the press conference argument seems to be mostly a resistance to change/appeal to tradition bias. "This is the way it has always been done and therefor it is the correct way to do things." The problem with this line of thinking is that you never explore other possibilities and may never find out that the traditional way of doing things isn't as effective as other ways of doing the same thing. It's possible that the way you are doing things is the best way, but "because that's the way we've always done it" isn't a good reason and can blind people from better alternatives to the point that they will staunchly refuse to acknowledge a better or equally as good way.
The press obviously has a bias in this affair because they have a lot more to gain from being middlemen presenting information that Nintendo could more effectively present directly to their current and potential customers. All of those headlines are good clickbait and set their readers up to believe that Nintendo's current E3 strategies are bad without ever giving them a chance. They're preying on peoples' resistance to change by reporting Nintendo's plans with negative headlines. Nintendo should work with the press but they shouldn't be beholden to them like this.
True. Also, it's worth remembering that E3 conferences have changed very little since pre-mainstream internet. Now Nintendo is taking advantage of the ability to reach anybody, and what's more, they're going even further, moving the user participation factor outside of the event. It really is forward thinking. Meanwhile, MS and Sony will stand onstage for a crowd while generously jamming superlatives into their own corporate summaries, just like they've always done, and Nintendo used to.
The way I see it, Nintendo saw little reason to placate the media after the deluge of recent bad press, so they've basically said "ok, we'll do it without you", and they're killing two birds with one stone by saving money and bringing the E3 experience to homes and stores. And now the press is putting out an unsurprising negative response. Given that they'd probably have done the same for a 3rd year running anyway ("Zelda U looks amazing, but doesn't really vindicate Wii U/Starfox U looks amazing, but doesn't really justify the existence of the console/Metroid Prime 4 could be one of the best games ever made, but Wii U still needs more 3rd party support"), it makes sense for Nintendo to adopt this new strategy.
Pretty much.
Brutal.
What if Human Head Wii U project was Metroid? That way they could have Metroid for Wii U this year. Having already developed games like Prey they could totally do it.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=657985
it has been reported so long ago how come no one has found out anything new?
I don't know what his deal was.
I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but last year during E3 Keighly invited the Mega64 crew and talked with them about the announcements. The Mega64 guys were really excited for Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Mario 3D World, X and Smash Bros. Keighly repeatedly tried to change the subject (Hey guys how about Xbox One? PS4?) but the Mega64 guys just ignored him and couldn't stop talking about Nintendo games. It was a really, really sad thing to see.
The funniest/sad part is that Spike TV's designated time to talk about Nintendo.
Edit: They had a similar time designated for MS/Sony, and Keighly wanted to talk about their respective companies at those times.
it has been reported so long ago how come no one has found out anything new?
The funniest/sad part is that Spike TV's designated time to talk about Nintendo.
Edit: They had a similar time designated for MS/Sony, and Keighly wanted to talk about their respective companies at those times.
I ask the same for the Next Level Games Wii U project and that's has been since October 2012 since we've heard anything
it has been reported so long ago how come no one has found out anything new?
I ask the same for the Next Level Games Wii U project and that's has been since October 2012 since we've heard anything
If it's a second party game, it's usual to not have anything leaked.
Is it likely they'll talk about QOL at this E3? Have they said anything about where/when they'd talk more about it?
If they want a mass-market success they need mass-market media coverage. E3 could help with it.I wouldn't count on it. They said they would talk about it later this year, but that was about it.
It seems like more of a thing they'd talk about in an investor conference.