Bobby Roberts
Banned
Why do people complain about yoda using a lightsaber , how else is he gonna fight?
Mind bullets.
(that's telekinesis, Kyle)
Why do people complain about yoda using a lightsaber , how else is he gonna fight?
That useless spin makes me laugh to this day. Like, what the fuck, Obi Wan? XD
Why does Yoda have to fight?Why do people complain about yoda using a lightsaber , how else is he gonna fight?
With the Force?Why do people complain about yoda using a lightsaber , how else is he gonna fight?
The greatness of the prequels resides in two men
![]()
![]()
Why does Yoda have to fight?
Yeah, remember all those exciting things Sam Jackson did, such as whenThe greatness of the prequels resides in two men
Clone Wars cartoon.Yeah, remember all those exciting things Sam Jackson did, such as when
But he was a complete douchebag in the Clone Wars cartoon.Clone Wars cartoon.
I do indeed mean the Genndy cartoon.But he was a complete douchebag in the Clone Wars cartoon.
Unless you mean the Genndy Clone Wars cartoon, where he was indeed awesome.
Why does Yoda have to fight?
I do indeed mean the Genndy cartoon.
The reason why everyone else fightsWhy does Yoda have to fight?
With the Force?
Obi wan prequel? God yes! He's the best part of the prequels!Jar Jar was never the problem, but that doesn't mean he's some kind of great character.
Ewan McGregor was pretty good. I'd have no problem with Disney bringing him back for an Obi-Wan prequel.
Jar Jar was never the problem, but that doesn't mean he's some kind of great character.
Ewan McGregor was pretty good. I'd have no problem with Disney bringing him back for an Obi-Wan prequel.
The choreography of the ESB fight is intended to make Vader look like an expert, but in a different way. At the start of the fight, Vader often wields his lightsaber with one hand and doesn't move his body with his strikes, suggesting he's handling poor Luke with contemptuous ease and little effort.In the OT, the lightsabres are more metaphoric. ESB is great, because Vader is just toying with Luke. In ROTJ, Luke overcomes Vader for reasons. The fights aren't over-choreographed, but Luke or Vader never felt like experts in swords. Luke just flails the thing all the time without any precision. A kid has the same skill as Luke.
The Star Wars movie next year is a prequel.The last thing the Star Wars franchise needs is more prequels, please god just give us something new that isn't handcuffed by the OT like the Old Republic or something.
It was never established in the OT that the Jedi Order was war-faring, only that Obi-wan and Anakin fought in the Clone Wars.All the other jedi fight why can't yoda?
"For over a thousand generations the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic."It was never established in the OT that the Jedi Order was war-faring, only that Obi-wan and Anakin fought in the Clone Wars.
Definitely. Though since Vader's suit is restrictive, it does make some of his moves look awkward, especially in ROTJ. He can't really raise his arms.The choreography of the ESB fight is intended to make Vader look like an expert, but in a different way. At the start of the fight, Vader often wields his lightsaber with one hand and doesn't move his body with his strikes, suggesting he's handling poor Luke with contemptuous ease and little effort.
It's very cool-looking.
Guardians of peace and justice =/= war-faring generals and tacticians."For over a thousand generations the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic."
Granted, Yoda seems to not be very fond of battle.
"War does not make one great."
I know when I'm on my own on an abandoned planet, I like to take out my lightsaber, just cause.He also never pulls out a lightsaber once in either ESB or ROTJ, despite Obi-wan actively using his in ANH.
To teach Luke how to be a Jedi? Afterall, Obi-wan tells Anakin in Episode II that his lightsaber is his LIFE. The prequels make it that important essentially.I know when I'm on my own on an abandoned planet, I like to take out my lightsaber, just cause.
Yoda had no reason to take out his lightsaber. Why would he?
Also did he even still have it at that point?
To teach Luke how to be a Jedi? Afterall, Obi-wan tells Anakin in Episode II that his lightsaber is his LIFE. The prequels make it that important essentially.
He never had a lightsaber in ESB because he didn't need one to teach Luke how to be a Jedi. Because in the OT, a Jedi isn't about being highly skilled at using the lightsaber it's about a connection with the Force. This is missed completely in the PT by Lucas who decided to make everyone into master swordsmen.
No, that was Luke's assumption. Obi-Wan just said Yoda was his master.To the prequel's credit, how was Yoda first mentioned by Obi-Wan?
"A great warrior."
Not a wise man, not a sage mentor or teacher... but "a great warrior", there to teach him how to kick ass and defeat Vader.
The greatness of the prequels resides in two men
![]()
The choreography of the ESB fight is intended to make Vader look like an expert, but in a different way. At the start of the fight, Vader often wields his lightsaber with one hand and doesn't move his body with his strikes, suggesting he's handling poor Luke with contemptuous ease and little effort.
It's very cool-looking.
The Star Wars movie next year is a prequel.
No, that was Luke's assumption. Obi-Wan just said Yoda was his master.
Yoda: You will know... when you are calm, at peace, passive. A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, NEVER for attack.
This is the prequels' only contribution to mankind
![]()
"For over a thousand generations the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic."
AKA they were space cops
Granted, Yoda seems to not be very fond of battle.
"War does not make one great."
If only I could....Did you forget the Clone Wars TV CGI show?
To teach Luke how to be a Jedi? Afterall, Obi-wan tells Anakin in Episode II that his lightsaber is his LIFE. The prequels make it that important essentially.
He never had a lightsaber in ESB because he didn't need one to teach Luke how to be a Jedi. Because in the OT, a Jedi isn't about being highly skilled at using the lightsaber it's about a connection with the Force. This is missed completely in the PT by Lucas who decided to make everyone into master swordsmen.
I can't imagine the depth, breadth, and sheer tonnage of the "I Told You So" being thrown by you at this board if, by some chance, Palpatine shows up in the new trilogy.
The reason yoda didn't have his light saber because he had no need for it. And it was all about the light saber still in the OT because then why teach Luke How to fight? Yoda wised up after Qui-Qon Jinn taught obit wan and yoda how to be one with the force
No shit. Yoda doesn't need one period, even if he was fighting in the Clone Wars. Yoda's whole point was the the Force was something of defense not of offense.The reason yoda didn't have his light saber because he had no need for it. And it was all about the light saber still in the OT because then why teach Luke How to fight? Yoda wised up after Qui-Qon Jinn taught obit wan and yoda how to be one with the force
No shit. Yoda doesn't need one period, even if he was fighting in the Clone Wars. Yoda's whole point was the the Force was something of defense not of offense.
There's no reason why the backdrop of the prequel trilogy involves the Clone Wars or any galactic war for that matter.
It worked, Vader was paralyzed by confusion and unable to take advantage. It portrays the student and mentor relationship. Even though Darth Vader feels like he's outgrown his master, his master still has lessons to teach him, like this one for example.
The prequels is just dumb choreagraphy, Lucas is an idiot and anyone involved in that project was too stupid for their own good.
Ok? So because George Lucas made it up, it means it isn't stupid? Yeah, no.
There's clear discrepancies, whether you choose to ignore them is up to you. It doesn't matter if you think the scene is cool or not when it fails are doing it's job as showcasing Yoda in the time of the Old Republic. The whole point of the prequels by design by George himself was to explain all the mysteries of the OT, only the end result raised more questions on their own which was later explained in series like Clone Wars and other EU material.
It's weird to me that people complain about the prequels being "high tech" compared to the OT. The universe still very much feels "used" outside of coruscant and kamino, which are both rich planets. I think people are confusing CG for in-universe technological advancement.
Whats with the love for Darth Maul? The dude only had like one line in the whole movie. Is it just the double edged light saber because aside from that he's a lame villain.
What makes Darth Maul "arguably the greatest villain in the series" when doesn't ever do anything? His sole moment of being threatening is followed up by him being cut in half by a Padawan. He has 2 lines of dialogue. He's completely irrelevant to Star Wars until there were like eight bad attempts to bring him back.Ignoring all the Clone Wars bullshit, we got Darth Maul, arguably the greatest villain of the series. Parts of the podrace were neat to watch, and I enjoyed parts of the battle between the droids and gungans.
If only I could....
It's weird to me that people complain about the prequels being "high tech" compared to the OT. The universe still very much feels "used" outside of coruscant and kamino, which are both rich planets. I think people are confusing CG for in-universe technological advancement.
Whats with the love for Darth Maul? The dude only had like one line in the whole movie. Is it just the double edged light saber because aside from that he's a lame villain.
The same could easily be said for Boba Fett, lol.What makes Darth Maul "arguably the greatest villain in the series" when doesn't ever do anything? His sole moment of being threatening is followed up by him being cut in half by a Padawan. He has 2 lines of dialogue. He's completely irrelevant to Star Wars until there were like eight bad attempts to bring him back.