Zog
Banned
Fine, I apologize.
I still think the Switch is a port machine though.
Fine, I apologize.
Another old game coming to Switch for full price. Imagine if, in 1991 Super Mario Bros. was announced with extra content (an extra level or two but no graphical upgrade) on the Super Nintendo at full price
Is a new class worth another $60? That's some expensive DLC.
its the dodge rolls man,I feel dirty for saying this but Diablo III feels better with a controller. Now, I am interested in how Diablo III feels on a handheld.
Not quite the same, since the game did come with graphical upgrades and new content. However, since Diablo III has never been on handheld, I guess it's hard to see how it compares to the previous versions like your example is doing.
Starting an argument with one poster in this thread didn't went well better start a new one.Super Mario All Stars didn't just come with extra content, it came with 3 other full games and it had a graphical and audio upgrade. You think that I didn't consider Super Mario All Stars when I made that statement?
Do you have anything to say about the comment you quoted or did you just post to attack me?Starting an argument with one poster in this thread didn't went well better start a new one.
sameTo be fair Diablo 3 will work really well on the switch too, I'm game for it.. for like the 3rd time of playing it. Haha
Not even that if you rarely take it out of the dock. I don't find it very comfortable to play compared to other handhelds.The Switch is turning out to be a portable PS360.
I still think the Switch is a port machine though.
Okay, so for someone like me who hasn't played Diablo 3 since launch -- or for someone who hasn't played it at all -- you don't think it's worth the asking price? Didn't it launch on PS4 for around the same price?Super Mario All Stars didn't just come with extra content, it came with 3 other full games and it had a graphical and audio upgrade. You think that I didn't consider Super Mario All Stars when I made that statement?
Okay, so for someone like me who hasn't played Diablo 3 since launch -- or for someone who hasn't played it at all -- you don't think it's worth the asking price? Didn't it launch on PS4 for around the same price?
I'm just saying that ports are a part of the console's lifecycle, and there are complains about ports at the beginning of every console's lifespan.
A game console isn't merely made up of its holiday-hits and biggest exclusives. I think it'll be a cool game to own on Switch. However, I can understand if people pass on it.
Yes, that's true. Sad isn't it. Talking about ports from previous generations, not current gen multiplats.ALL consoles are “port machines” now.
Yes, that's true. Sad isn't it. Talking about ports from previous generations, not current gen multiplats.
Right, but I specifically waited and didn't buy the PS3 or PS4 versions, hoping to someday get a portable version. And here we are. Why're you trying to piss in my soup, man? This is a cool game announcement (if the rumor is true).If you've never played it then sure, it may worth $60 but is it worth $120 if you buy it twice or $180 if you buy it three times and so on....
Chances are though, instead of a graphical upgrade the Switch will likely see a graphical downgrade from the PS4..
Not only do I find it uncomfortable to play the Switch in portable mode, I find it fragile as well compared to the 3DS or even the Vita. To me, the Switch is just an under powered console with full priced ports. Nintendo really does consider it a console too which is why they are still supporting the 3DS but not the Wii U.And when it comes to the Switch, being able to play something like Skyrim easily when I am traveling for business is pretty damn awesome.
Obviously, I don't think it's a cool announcement. I think it's just another full priced port.Right, but I specifically waited and didn't buy the PS3 or PS4 versions, hoping to someday get a portable version. And here we are. Why're you trying to piss in my soup, man? This is a cool game announcement (if the rumor is true).
If you don't have positive comments you shouldn't comment at all?Not sure I understand the complaints. We can either have Diablo 3 on the Switch or not have Diablo 3 on the Switch. Having the option is better. People who want it can pick it up and people that don’t want it can ignore it. Nothing lost. Blizzard wouldn’t be making a new Switch exclusive if they weren’t making this so we aren’t giving up anything to get this.
If you don't have positive comments you shouldn't comment at all?
No, of course not. I’m just commenting that I don’t get the complaint about this being ported. To me a new game that wasn’t there before is a positive.
No, I don't expect deep thoughts go into blatant trolling.Super Mario All Stars didn't just come with extra content, it came with 3 other full games and it had a graphical and audio upgrade. You think that I didn't consider Super Mario All Stars when I made that statement?
No, I don't expect deep thoughts go into blatant trolling.
Anyway, as someone who never played Diablo 3, I'm excited for this news. I might pick it up someday.
make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.
Looking forward to Ice Climber on the Switch?
That’s just cold.
Agreed.The Switch is turning into what the Vita should have been. The Elder Scrolls and Diablo are perfect portable game (IMHO)
Totally not trollingI really did Laugh out Loud when I read this.
GBA had Super Mario Advance and Super Mario Advance 4 though, which were partial rereleases of Super Mario All-Stars with minor new content (plus the e-Reader stuff on SMA4, which required additional investment though and was only available in USA and Japan). Also, it had rereleases of DKC, DKC2, DKC3, SMW, YI, Zelda ALttP, each with at most minor new content (highlights being Four Swords in ALttP, a new world in DKC3 and six new levels in YI). That being said, I am also quite furious over the amount of ports of old games on Switch. There is almost nothing new coming out and as a long-time Nintendo fan I am very, very disappointed with the Switch right now. If Smash Bros. does not get a proper single player, it will be the first year sind 1995 that I do not buy a single Nintendo-published game...Super Mario All Stars didn't just come with extra content, it came with 3 other full games and it had a graphical and audio upgrade. You think that I didn't consider Super Mario All Stars when I made that statement?
What does finding a post funny have to do with trolling? In fact, I would say that calling someone a troll is 'making a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them'.Totally not trolling
Pretty sure all the GBA ports were cheaper than the SNES originals.GBA had Super Mario Advance and Super Mario Advance 4 though, which were partial rereleases of Super Mario All-Stars with minor new content (plus the e-Reader stuff on SMA4, which required additional investment though and was only available in USA and Japan). Also, it had rereleases of DKC, DKC2, DKC3, SMW, YI, Zelda ALttP, each with at most minor new content (highlights being Four Swords in ALttP, a new world in DKC3 and six new levels in YI). That being said, I am also quite furious over the amount of ports of old games on Switch. There is almost nothing new coming out and as a long-time Nintendo fan I am very, very disappointed with the Switch right now. If Smash Bros. does not get a proper single player, it will be the first year sind 1995 that I do not buy a single Nintendo-published game...
YOU WILL LIKE ITNo Blizzard.
No. Just no.
I will NOT quadruple-dip.
You hear me?
...
...
Goddamnit.
Well they were 40€ here, which is full price for GBA games, and yes, cheaper than SNES full price was. But only by ~30%.Pretty sure all the GBA ports were cheaper than the SNES originals.
Usually to be edgy you have to have an opinion that goes against the grain, not one that the average person agrees with...EDGE
D
G
E
OW
W
Well they were 40€ here, which is full price for GBA games, and yes, cheaper than SNES full price was. But only by ~30%.