fart town usa
Gold Member
I'm pretty sure it's beastly. But let me guess, something something high end PCs something something years ago
something something.
lol
This.
I'm pretty sure it's beastly. But let me guess, something something high end PCs something something years ago
something something.
will this be able to run BF3 on ultra? 1080p/60fps
UPDATE: some people is confused about the GPU, here you have more info about it:
Each CU contains dedicated:
- ALU (32 64-bit operations per cycle)
- Texture Unit
- L1 data cache
- Local data share (LDS)
About 14 + 4 balance:
- 4 additional CUs (410 Gflops) “extra” ALU as resource for compute
- Minor boost if used for rendering
Dual Shader Engines:
- 1.6 billion triangles/s, 1.6 billion vertices/s
18 Texture units
- 56 billion bilinear texture reads/s
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
8 Render backends:
- 32 color ops/cycle
- 128 depth ops/cycle
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
I still remain curious to know how can DDR3 at 106 GB of speed (more or less) overtake 176 GB of GDDR5 even with the double of the RAM. Can someone delight me?
"UPDATE: some people is confused about the GPU, here you have more info about it:
Each CU contains dedicated:
- ALU (32 64-bit operations per cycle)
- Texture Unit
- L1 data cache
- Local data share (LDS)
About 14 + 4 balance:
- 4 additional CUs (410 Gflops) extra ALU as resource for compute
- Minor boost if used for rendering
Dual Shader Engines:
- 1.6 billion triangles/s, 1.6 billion vertices/s
18 Texture units
- 56 billion bilinear texture reads/s
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
8 Render backends:
- 32 color ops/cycle
- 128 depth ops/cycle
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
"
Seems like the Cell parts some hoped for aren't int there Too bad.
VGLEAKS updated their latest Orbis article! More GPU info:
http://www.vgleaks.com/world-exclusive-orbis-unveiled/
I still remain curious to know how can DDR3 at 106 GB of speed (more or less) overtake 176 GB of GDDR5 even with the double of the RAM. Can someone delight me?
This + extra 2 CU's are the special sauce.
VGLEAKS updated their latest Orbis article! More GPU info:
http://www.vgleaks.com/world-exclusive-orbis-unveiled/
If the Move controller comes in the box, it's going straight in the bin.
"UPDATE: some people is confused about the GPU, here you have more info about it:
Each CU contains dedicated:
- ALU (32 64-bit operations per cycle)
- Texture Unit
- L1 data cache
- Local data share (LDS)
About 14 + 4 balance:
- 4 additional CUs (410 Gflops) extra ALU as resource for compute
- Minor boost if used for rendering
Dual Shader Engines:
- 1.6 billion triangles/s, 1.6 billion vertices/s
18 Texture units
- 56 billion bilinear texture reads/s
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
8 Render backends:
- 32 color ops/cycle
- 128 depth ops/cycle
- Can utilize full memory bandwith
"
1.8TFs was bad enough, now we're down to 1.4? Eugh... What did gamers do to deserve this?That's what the extra 4 CUs are doing is also present in a dedicated CU in Durango. Just saying.
So we have 1.4 TFlops vs. 1.2
VGLEAKS updated their latest Orbis article! More GPU info:
http://www.vgleaks.com/world-exclusive-orbis-unveiled/
Can someone now explain the TMU/TU's feature matching with a pitcairn with that 56 billion bilinear reads since they did not multiply by 4?
1.8TFs was bad enough, now we're down to 1.2? Eugh... What did gamers do to deserve this?
Seriously this article looks like it was written by fanboys. GAF points out that 14CUs makes no sense and magically the article is updated with new info that says there are now 4 extra compute CUs to make 18.
I don't believe VGLeaks after this and getting the Blu-ray spec wrong.
Because '1 Texture unit' in a CU is 4 texture filter units. Just think of it as 4 texture units if you prefer. It's the same 4 'texture units' in every other GCN CU.
Let me see :
The extra CUs were in fact...included in the original 18 CUs count.
Talk about extra...hahaha...
Have they been right in previous leaks?
So... is it more powerful than Durango ?
Seriously this article looks like it was written by fanboys. GAF points out that 14CUs makes no sense and magically the article is updated with new info that says there are now 4 extra compute CUs to make 18.
I don't believe VGLeaks after this and getting the Blu-ray spec wrong.
So... is it more powerful than Durango ?
Have they been right in previous leaks?
hey all you guys that were saying no one said "the Vita is going to be no less than $400", pay attention this time
Yeah it is.its what Proelite was saying all along
Woops, meant 1.4 for Orbis, corrected now.The 1.2 are for Durango.
So... is it more powerful than Durango ?
Have they been right in previous leaks?
What does this mean for the lowly ones that don't understand most of this?.
Have they been right in previous leaks?
Yes they have. Pertaining to confirmation of dev kits by sources.
Just because the Wii U is massively overpriced doesn't mean that this thing shouldn't come in at the same price as the Wii U considering the specs.I can't wait for the crying and unrealistic expectations for it to be the same price or cheaper than the WiiU.
And finally the heart breaking meltdowns when the price is revealed.