OrbitalBeard
Member
Heh, I guess that answers the questions I had in this thread
This is the quote that the article is using.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2015-05-27-sony-admits-first-party-lineup-a-little-sparse/
House doesn't say that 2nd quoted text in the OP, that's the author's interpretation.
Yep, still looking forward to play it for years to come.Japanese games and localizations aren't going anywhere so it's not like anyone that cares about the platform cares about what House thinks about it.
Give us the PS2 catalog on PSV.
family_guy said:Prices will probably go up since they'll probably quit restocking them.
http://gamingtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/gsm_169_walkingdead_vita_launch_ot_081913_640x360-620x347.jpg
http://download.gamezone.com/uploads/image/data/1150032/The-Walking-Dead-Vita.jpg
Ugh there should a memory card price drop instead :[
Nope, won't even get that honor because of Wii U.I think a lot of us will. Vita will go down in history as the greatest failed platform of all time, and I think we'll be looking back on the thing very fondly and condemning this terrible generation for not buying it. Vita is one of a kind. And the cool thing about Vita is that even when the system basically died and even Sony stopped supporting it, it somehow still got a fuck ton of great games for years! That's something that cant be said for systems like Dreamcast. Vita's legacy will be that it was the most alive dead system ever.
We noticed Andy. The whole 'not promoting it or making games for it' part sort of gave it away.
I'm moving on to the Nvidia Shield
What does 'Vita' mean anyway? I don't speak Spanish
Yup. It's baffling as to why they decided to just drop all major first party support for the system after their initial set of heavy hitters (Uncharted/Killzone/Gravity Rush/etc) failed. It would have been more logical to find out why they weren't as successful as they should have been and adjusted their strategy accordingly.
What? Oh hell no. Doesn't have tbe indie support of Vita to keep up the kind of impressive lineup of games once Nintendo drops support. It's a worse version of tge Gamecube since at least GC had something resembling third party support in its life. Also the first party lineup of Vita was fantastic wben Sony were supporting it so Wii U isn't even abead there imo. Ninty made gamea for longer, but Sony certainly left their mark in those first two years.Nope, won't even get that honor because of Wii U.
I'd also say this basically seals the deal that there won't be a successor.
I agree. It makes the system a lot more expensive than what it should be. But if it really drops to $100 at least the memory cards won't be as much of an issue anymore.
Its interesting seeing Nintendo and how they handled the Wii U and comparing it to Sony and the Vita. Both have sold roughly the same amount in almost the same timeframe, yet Nintendo is the only one supporting the Wii U. Sony on the other hand said "screw it, we tried, we made games from big franchises and they didnt get an audience and this isnt selling as well as the PSP so lets not bother." Then again, while a portable Call of Duty could have done well and maybe swung some sales, it being a shit game followed up with a shitty game in the Resistance franchise definitely hurt the system. Hell, Modnation Racers was a shell of the console game.
I mean really, Sony could have supported the device more before making it an afterthought everywhere. Where is a Patapon sequel or even a qHD collection? Where was a Vita God of War or Gran Turismo? Definitely shot themselves in the foot not lassoing that Monster Hunter exclusivity.
/KevinSorboDisappointed
If DanganRonpa 3 is released on PS4 or Steam (the developer seems interested in Steam) alongside the Vita release, then I'll won't have a reason to touch my Vita again, sadly.
I'll continue to enjoy my indie and wacky third party games while everyone else laments the death of the Vita for the 3rd year in a row.
Such a big damn waste. Loved both my vitas...
Its interesting seeing Nintendo and how they handled the Wii U and comparing it to Sony and the Vita. Both have sold roughly the same amount in almost the same timeframe, yet Nintendo is the only one supporting the Wii U. Sony on the other hand said "screw it, we tried, we made games from big franchises and they didnt get an audience and this isnt selling as well as the PSP so lets not bother." Then again, while a portable Call of Duty could have done well and maybe swung some sales, it being a shit game followed up with a shitty game in the Resistance franchise definitely hurt the system. Hell, Modnation Racers was a shell of the console game.
I mean really, Sony could have supported the device more before making it an afterthought everywhere. Where is a Patapon sequel or even a qHD collection? Where was a Vita God of War or Gran Turismo? Definitely shot themselves in the foot not lassoing that Monster Hunter exclusivity.
/KevinSorboDisappointed
I do wonder what they'll do with ps+ for vita and PS3 eventually. They've got to stop at some point but the way the handle the announcement will probably lead to meltdowns of the likes I've never seen.
I've been itching to buy a Shield for a while and I just upgraded my PC. It's time.
My Vita ain't going anywhere though. It's still my favourite handheld and my backlog is fucking huge.
I think the memory card prices did a lot more damage than anything, really. $249 on top of the price of the card itself.
Great system, but Sony gonna Sony with their proprietary BS.
It should have just been a regular MircoSD and it might have done a bit better.
Sure, more support would have helped too.
Nope, won't even get that honor because of Wii U.