SmoothRunningGun
Member
I don't know about them after bf4 but yes let's wait until they are compared side by side.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Destructoid "Call of Duty Ghosts performs smoothly on Xbox One"
- Thread starter FordGTGuy
- Start date
I don't know about them after bf4 but yes let's wait until they are compared side by side.
TheLegendary
Member
There are reported frame rate drops in multiplayer PS4 as well, not just single player.
That's quite strange. What I heard was that multiplayer was 60 FPS locked and not variable with single player being a variable 30 to 60 FPS. I'll have to do more research on it I guess. Though I don't really care too much. I have my copy of Killzone SF sitting on my shelf ready to go on the 15th.
Where are you getting these figures from? Can you link me to actual gameplay footage of Ryse with 50-100 enemies on screen at once?
shinra-bansho
Member
I believe ElTorro made the gif, based on frame by frame grabs to be representative (although I could be mistaken). I trust in his gif making abilities.
SRTtoZ
Member
Oops, I never played RageBut in my opinion, COD has always had a very solid frame rate online.
Somebody needs to find a video encoded by the same user and see if it stutters like that one.
His other CoD Ghosts XB1 video has the same issue (again, at a certain point in the game, not random):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It26p5M51OE&feature=youtu.be
starting @1:00 every time he walks across the roof it stutters.
SmoothRunningGun
Member
Exactly. They're just too honest for there own good.
depends on if one of those settings is 4xSSAA.
the furore over battlefield i can kinda accept. sure it's hypocritical seeing sony types do a 180 turn on arguments they've made against buying a PC for the last few years, but atleast BF4 is a real technical showcase and one of best looking games on any platform, with a scope to match.
this, on the other hand, i don't get. it's a mediocre rehash with clear technical shortcomings that's stumbling over its own sales targets in order to get out in time for launch. it doesn't look particularly good, it doesn't do anything particularly new, it's just become a dumb forum proxy battle over a stinky stretch of bogland that nobody wants to live on anyway.
Chance Hale
Member
The most recent footage has some large crowd scenes with you fighting alongside multiple legionaries(or something of that nature, my Roman history is limited) while there are many others in the background. Would say it's on the lower end of 50-100 but it's still quite nice.
The short clips don't seem to feature the bits I refer to, but it was in the 40 minute stream done earlier today.
phosphor112
Banned
I'll take Gerstmann's word over this guy's. Jeff even said that there was draw distance fog and a lower limit on how many bots you can add in the game. I doubt it would be "solid 60" if they needed to cut that many corners.
That's unfortunate then. I hope they can patch the game to correct it. I've heard that the PC version has the same issues with frame rate.
Huh? I never even mentioned Ryse. I was just stating that KZ is 60fps.
And surely I wouldn't compare a FPS to Crytek's latest tech demo.
Even single and SLI Titans have framerate problems.
Watch the newest stream video from Twitch there are easily scenes where it hits over 50 npcs even more so with the cutscene transitions that showed no graphical fidelity change at all.
Why do you have to call RYSE a tech demo? It looks like a fun hack and slash.
Rogue_Ledr
Banned
AND?
Its 60 FPS on every platform.
Even current gen. This is hardly news.
Its 60 FPS on every platform.
Even current gen. This is hardly news.
Hip Hop
Member
The map that he is on is the most graphics intensive in the game when playing on PC. Everytime you look into that side of the map, it stutters and the frames begin to drop.
You cant be serious? KZSF SP will be unlocked so ranges from 30-60FPS@ 1080p.
Also cant compare modes? Since when did IW say anything about having different resolutions for their SP/MP? Dude just face cold hard facts, even PC Elite dudes are suffering shit frames. What makes you think the Xbone is cleared? LOL
shu_letthemdream.jpeg
3rdamention
Member
So he cant tell what the resolution is but can tell the game doesnt drop frames AND is 60fps?
That's all that Crytek seems to release.
Chance Hale
Member
It could be so downgraded that it runs without issues! 360 version runs quite well apparently. Very unlikely though.
Hawk269
Member
It amazes me how quick you come in to any Xbox One thread that starts with anything positive to try to disprove it. It may be just me, but it seems like you have a personal agenda to counter any remote positive news in regards to the Xbox One. Again, just may be me that see's it that way.
I watched that footage. Not even close to those numbers on screen at once. Maybe 15-25 tops. But most of the characters in the background don't appear to be fully AI and aren't doing anything besides a routine animation over and over.
Man-is-Obsolete
Member
He is saying there was no drops in frames, but some mentioned there was on PS4. Everyone has a different tolerance to this though and some mentioned they didn't even see drips on the PS4 version.
In other words if you want to count frames best to wait for DF's side by side.
They did. Mark Rubin confirmed it in the Eurogamer interview.
There are contradicting reports on framer are drops on both consoles. This leads me to believe that these are either rare or unnoticeable to some.
Yep i was just about to post that. He only played one match...
Holy shit, this guy really likes Call of Duty.
Muppet of a Man
Member
I think what he is saying is that there is never more than 5 or 6 enemies max with any sort of AI that attack the player.
There looks to be dozens and dozens of non-interactive npcs that are running around the map to your point however..
Because from what I'm reading you can proceed one handed mindlessly mashing buttons. When it will come out and if it won't be like that I will consider it an actual game.
Chance Hale
Member
There was the one bit where he was battling the barbarians and the second group of Romans was coming towards you that looked to be quite large. Certainly no where near 100 though and completely incomparable to the scale of Dead Rising 3. And as mentioned they didn't seem to really be fully active.
FinalStageBoss
Banned
Right, I cant run it smooth on my PC and I'm supposed to believe this?
We're all used to mindlessly using one hand at this point.
Clear
CliffyB's Cock Holster
Kind of an obvious observation, but... if IW have time to fix up the Xbone version from a build they didn't want to show to a smooth final release, why wouldn't they be equally able to tidy-up a small number of frame-drops on the PS4 build they were happy to put out there, in the same time-frame?
Speedy Blue Dude
Banned
Want me to take a guess? Video Encoder issues or Old Build. I believe Destructoid on this.
Fuck if they're dropping it down to 720p, my frame rate better be consistent.
fluffydelusions
Member
And can you link me to a gameplay video of Dead Rising 3 that has two thousand zombies on screen at once?
Hellsing321
Member
It ultimately doesn't matter how it runs on Xbox One because we already knows it looks like and/or runs like shit on every other system. It should' be used as a critique of the power of either system and should only be used as evidence of IW's incompetence.
For some reason I just remembered that Planetside 2 has over 2000 players on one giant map.
If you want to play numbers I can play too you know.
Garrett 2U
Member
Right.. I'm sure it doesn't matter at all to the people who are going to be playing the game.
Or how about drop the resolution on PS4...this is kind of perplexing.
Chance Hale
Member
When did the PS4 footage come out?
SenjutsuSage
Banned
Yea, I noticed frame drops as I think he was heading towards some pickup item. It's definitely not a solid 60 in MP, but 30+ and an occasional 40-50+ seems isn't bad either. Game still looks fantastic visually, and it doesn't have bad performance.
Dude, it isn't as easy as you think... Forget the console wars stuff for a moment. It seriously isn't as easy as people think, or as easy you make it sound. Nobody could accurately tell Ryse wasn't 1080p. You would go mad trying to discern that just at a glance. Some think there's nothing about Forza 5 that makes it look particularly higher res than Ryse or certain other games. I had no idea Dead Rising 3 was 720p until they said something. It's a lot harder to tell these things than people appreciate. You put up a range of games in front of people and ask them to guess the resolution, or simply just to give a yes or no on whether this game is running at 720p, and to be prepared to lose some fingers for being wrong, and I guarantee a lot of us would end up on the losing end of that challenge lol.
phosphor112
Banned
derp, I"m an idiot.
FinalStageBoss
Banned
idk how they fucked this up. It's the same shit they do every year.
Hellsing321
Member
It meant it doesn't matter as a next-gen penis measuring contest. Obviously people who want to buy it will want to know if they're getting a quality product or just being sold a bill of goods.
I will say this though that since 360 was lead platform, there may be a chance its the best out of all platforms but Im not sure how well xbone will do.
KOMANI
KOMANI
i was thinking that too. I wonder if it's pressure from Sony. There's nothing to back up my thoughts, but it is inconsistent to have one with better resolution and one with a better frame rate (allegedly).