OK, so here's what I saw, an officer being pushed against a large plate glass window by an extremely large, actively resisting male, clearly a very dangerous situation for the officer, and one that needed to get addressed immediately. An officer used a choke hold for a matter of a few seconds to get him on the ground, once on the ground he pushed his face toward the ground to gain compliance as the male was still resisting. I didn't see a single punch thrown. When someone is talking, especially repeatedly, they are breathing, it is a well known ploy of resistive subjects to claim a physical ailment so officers will let up, at which time they amp up their resistive behavior in an attempt to escape or assault an officer. As long as the arrest or lawful detention is justified, which was not recorded (or at least provided), I don't see anything wrong with this. It does suck that the guy died, and it certainly wasn't the intention of the officers to have him die, but at the same time, it wasn't their fault. Here comes the lawsuit.
By the way, where's Al Sharpton when the New Jersey officer was ambushed and murdered, where's his outrage over the mother's insensitive and inflammatory statements. Where's his condemnation of the gang members swearing revenge on other officers. Oh, wait, there's probably no money coming in on that one. My bad.