Tangentially, that's one of the roots of Gamergate right there. You have some people explaining how the culture excludes them and saying how they think that it should be improved. And you have others - most of which weren't even the intended audience - replying with "why are you getting in the way of my fun?"
Scanning over the thread, there was a post much earlier where someone asked when this would end. Hopefully it mostly dies down over time, but I'm not sure if it will go away completely. Look at, say, Christian Weston Chandler, the autistic guy who people have been cyberstalking and harassing for years. Some people don't seem to get bored of harassment, whether because they expect to get some new reaction or because new people stumble upon it and it's new to them.
A big issue is that a lot of people, Chrischan being possibly the prime example, have been deemed "
acceptable targets" by the internet and are from that point on simply a weird cow to milk for entertainment.
Now I personally think it should be fine to be critical, even in a humorous way, of creative works or self-perpetuated media. But at the same time I see that (especially in the chan/ED corners of the internet) that a significant number of people absolutely
can't disconnect:
"Hey let's be critical of this person's product" & "Hey let's
stalk this person/
ruin this person's life/
exploit this person".
Although the underlying moral indignity is for the most part shallow & mostly intended to take away any safety net for the victim, you do see in almost all of these cases that rampant harassment is almost always paired with many, many examples of
how the victim "Had it coming/is deserving" because of x, y and z. But the thing is ... when you combine obsessive stalking over several years + the willingness of harassers to skew seemingly innocuous events into something terrible,
you can make anyone look bad.
Back in the old GG thread I actually went out of my way to source nearly every single claim made about Zoe's "Bad behavior" & it was just a gish gallop of relatively mild and often harmless stuff being spun into this narrative of a doxxing, harassing manipulative monster.
The sad thing is ... it works, with almost all of these cases you have droves of people trying to point out how they're "bad too", or derailing a conversation about how harassment needs to be dealt with with how victim x, y and z had it coming.
weird white-knighting posts equating the two in relation to her.
As I said, I'm ignorant on the subject but that's how it appears to me as an outsider.
Spoilers: Going around insinuating people are "White Knighting" a harassment victim isn't a good start to a subject you're ignorant on. That's an
extremely loaded term.