• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Eurogamer: Independently confirms source that the PS4.5 is real, referred as PS 4K

On the real though, what Zhuge posted is a PS4.01 and not a PS4.5 like the rumours are suggesting. A true PS4.5 would be a 2-4X leap in performance over what we have. This sounds like a PS4 Slim with some additional beef for VR.

A 4x Leap would be PS5 territory.
 
That was always a silly argument to begin with. Having to create mental constructs, by excluding platforms that don't count, just to feel that your experience is as good as that of anyone else is ridiculous.

Oh get the hell over yourself.

An even hardware level is the entire reason why I play multiplayer games on console in spite of a gaming quality PC. Full stop.

This is not a "mental construct", and referring to any concern as "silly" just shows that you are closed-minded.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
I keep seeing sentiment like this, but I have no idea what it's referring to.

What is being ignored??
Zoetis saying it's a PS4K and twitter dude saying it's a replacement for the PS4 rev 1200, which is the regular PS4 at MSRP. The concept that Zoetis said this was not.
 

dracula_x

Member
Something tells me the name won't be PS4K or PS4.5.

Could be PS4 VR edition.

It will be named PlayStation 4 or PS4. I doubt Sony will name it differently.

Maximum they will change logo, like it was with PS3 slim:

1185261-ps3_logo.png


sony-ps3-slim-logo-vector-01.png
 

dr_rus

Member
7 will likely be enhancements in the form of frame rate and/or antialiasing. That I think is likely especially if the APU is clocked higher or uses Zen. The GPU will also be slightly beefier for VR. It should smooth out frame rate in more than a few titles assuming the games get patched.

There isn't much you can do with AA or framerate without going for an X times more powerful GPU. So it's either not happening or is some sort of OS level enhancement like the ability to save more than the last 15min of gameplay etc.

It's rather interesting how they plan to actually make the additional performance closed off from the devs as I see no obvious way of doing this but through lowering the APU clocks maybe?
 

DOWN

Banned
So this is starting to sound more like the gaming experience won't be any different, it will just likely be a refresh slim model that adds support for 4K movies on 4K Blu-Ray?
 
Zoetis saying it's a PS4K and twitter dude saying it's a replacement for the PS4 rev 1200, which is the regular PS4 at MSRP.

Why not both?

Maybe this is just a traditional slim concept, but baking in the enhancements being rumored, priced at the same MSRP and a replacement console for the current model on the market?
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
It's not that crazy to think amds next console Apu could be 5 tflops, which is about right for 4k 30 fps at medium settings. It could potentially be a $100 at cost part, which is roughly want the launch ps4 Apu cost.
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
Nice, I was waiting for the redesign before I jumped in this time anyways. Looks like I made the right call.

I kind of like this idea. Maybe they are trying to stretch out the gens to be ps3 length(around 6 years) but have an upgraded hardware halfway between it so the wait isn't so agonizing. Kind of like the iPhone regular to S brand. But instead of a yearly turn around they do it halfway through the cycle.

So, 3 years for ps4, then slightly upgraded hardware 3 years later (ps4k), then ps5 on new architecture 3 years after that. 3 years later ps5+, etc. Etc.

Sounds like an alright strategy to me. Ps4 owners don't get fucked over, can upgrade if they want, or just wait out the three years for the next big release.

Taking a page from Nintendo. Like the DS to dsi or 3DS to New3DS.

I keep asking this, but will PS5 even be a new architecture? Couldn't it just be a more drastic upgrade?

Maybe Sony might use a different AMD GPU/APU or whatever, but I don't see any reason for it to leave behind x86.
 
Maybe native 1080p with 4k upscaling. Anyway I guess this is real. Sony has to say something soon because only a fool would buy a ps4 now especially if this story starts hitting mainstream sites.
 

KZObsessed

Member
Sounds a bit disappointing after all that PS4.5 talk. Was looking forward to a big boost but if it's just a small boost and 4k media ability then I think I'll just stick with the regular. Don't see it as anything anyone should be concerned about.
 

jelly

Member
I know Sony should do their own thing but wouldn't Microsoft be looking at something better because they really need a turnaround. Of course Microsoft may just match whatever Sony is doing more or less.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
The more I think about this the more I want this only to be a 4K/VR optimized PS4, with the regular PS4 left as the lead platform, if they release the 4.5 at all. Having to worry about a shoddy back port like the old 3DS is now seeing isn't what the most current generation of consoles should be about.

If it's a glorified upscaler that lets you get current levels of PS4 games in VR and 4K, with the regular PS4 still being the developer focus, that's fine. If it's a New PS4 in the Nintendo sense of the word with exclusive games and crappily running Old 3DS games, no to that.
 

DavidDesu

Member
Aren't UHD bluray players incredibly expensive still... this could be the cheapest option for those with 4K TVs, and doubles up as your go to 4K streaming box and of course plays games. I like that it could allow HDR games too, even if not in 4K. I can't wait to see what these new TV's look like, though I won't be able to afford one for years.

If that's all this is then I feel I will be quite happy with my PS4 for some time yet.
 
My guess (if real): smaller APU, HDMI 2.0 and 4K enabled for video content. Won't change a thing for games.

This is also my guess. I also wouldn't be surprised if they put all the VR stuff in the unit as well.

EDIT: More like the Xbox 360 and Xbox Elite. Came out later and added an HDMI port as well as Kinect stuff but was pretty much the same system for games.
 
Zoetis said this is about games and this is saying it's about system + media + VR.

Again, it could be both. Just not a generational leap that some were (perhaps foolishly) expecting.

Zoetis' comments don't contradict Zhuge's post. Perhaps Zoetis' posts had details read into them that weren't actually there? Perhaps I missed one or two?
 

Faenix1

Member
Hopefully this is just for 4K media and VR.

I'm disappointed this is even a thing, but as long as it doesnt impact my ability to play all future PS4 titles I guess I can live with it. If they expect me to shell out $400 every 2/3 years, PC sounds like the better bang for my buck.
 

DavidDesu

Member
I wonder if they release a regular PS4 Slim if they'll build in the VR Processing Unit into that as well as this PS4K console... They might as well, cos it's a cluster fuck of wires with the vanilla setup.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
Again, it's likely both. Just not a generational leap that some were (perhaps foolishly) expecting.

Zoetis' comments don't contradict Zhuge's post.
I disagree, but I also don't like post-modernism interpretation. One is saying primarily for games, the other is not but puts an out in.

If that is compatible then there is no spoon. How far we've fallen from rumors like "New IP named Knack will be shown and introduced by Mark Cerny" to this wishy washy bullshit.
 
Reasons why the PS 4K won't play a single AAA game at 4k.
  • 4K display owners are a tiny minority. It's projected that by 2025 only half of households in the US will have a 4K tv. Expect that percentage to be even less WW.

That's the main reason why there won't be 4K gaming for a long time (if ever).

Heck, there are people who are just now getting into Native 1080p HDTV's.
 
I guess the PS4k is real. Sony needs to clarify some shit, or maybe waiting for an E3 reveal.

I hate all the speculation. The old thread positing that the original PS4 was capable of 4k Blu-ray playback is laughably misinformed and, unless/until Sony clarifies the rumors, so is the wild speculation of what the PS4k will and won't do.
 
Not even going to argue with you, but the performance benefits are quite needed at the moment for VR, 4K, and "ambitious" developers. As an iOS developer do you guys have access to tools that allow you to estimate performance deltas between different devices?

If this happens, I think that this changes the cost/performance balance for consoles in a way that's never been done. I think it's hard to confidently predict the results.

Estimating GPU performance deltas is pretty simple, it's the CPU bound things that can get tricky/annoying.
 

zsynqx

Member
I disagree, but I also don't like post-modernism interpretation. One is saying primarily for games, the other is not but puts an out in.

If that is compatible then there is no spoon. How far we've fallen from rumors like "New IP named Knack will be shown and introduced by Mark Cerny" to this wishy washy bullshit.

The age of insiders is over.
 

Cyriades

Member
BTW I think this machine will be capable of 4K/30 , but in no way can they get 4K/60 up and running. Battlefront itself can't even do 4K/60 on a 980ti without huge dips. The good news though is, the benefits of going from 2500X1600p to 3840X2160p are not as substantial as you'd think. 2500X1600p is a sweet spot for on the spot 60 herz performance.

This is what I don't understand... they say this will improve VR to compete with rift/vibe but you cant change the 1080p panel in PSVR.
 
I disagree, but I also don't like post-modernism interpretation. One is saying primarily for games, the other is not but puts an out in.

If that is compatible then there is no spoon. How far we've fallen from rumors like "New IP named Knack will be shown and introduced by Mark Cerny" to this wishy washy bullshit.

Sorry but you've completely lost me.
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
So this is starting to sound more like the gaming experience won't be any different, it will just likely be a refresh slim model that adds support for 4K movies on 4K Blu-Ray?

Yes, I guess. We'll have to wait for Kotaku/Eurogamer to get more fleshed out details. They both have said it is more than a slim though.

The question I have is that if it is a slim with 4k output/blu ray only, why would game developers be discussing it at GDC and did they do the same with PS3 slim?

I also doubt the VR breakout box tech will be integrated into the APU or elsewhere. If VR goes poorly it would cost Sony a lot.
 

onQ123

Member
I disagree, but I also don't like post-modernism interpretation. One is saying primarily for games, the other is not but puts an out in.

If that is compatible then there is no spoon. How far we've fallen from rumors like "New IP named Knack will be shown and introduced by Mark Cerny" to this wishy washy bullshit.

Look at number 7


g1ZVvKX.png
 

Krisprolls

Banned
If it was a simple HDMI upgrade they wouldn't send kits and brief devs, so of course there's a graphical upgrade.

How big ? Nobody knows, but it's big enough to make some people buy a new model, so definitely not minor.
 

Kaako

Felium Defensor
I wanna know specifics regarding VR performance gains for existing PSVR titles. Insiders hook it up please, thanks.

Like can I run Dreams at 90fps native then repro to 120fps instead of 60 to 120?
 

mcrommert

Banned
Look at number 7


g1ZVvKX.png

Now that we have more info this seems to be a very different product from what we have heard publicly and what has been circulating privately about the xbox upgrades. The xbox upgrades will be continuous every few years and they will absolutely give power to devs...they are not mainly about vr/bluray 4k/system. They are mainly about moving games in rather sizable leaps forward. 1080 30 to 1080 60 with more effects and better textures

We will see how they show these...but i think they will be very different
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
'Developers won't have access to 100% of this power' is an interesting point - if true, of course.

Like maybe it's a set of fixed enhancement options devs can enable, to let Sony handle scalability between the two SKUs in a very managed/predictable way. Give devs some extra higher level things they can add on. So Sony could make sure nothing was done that used the power in a way that would make a game unplayable or distinctly less appealing on the original PS4.
 

Welfare

Member
A PS4 slim that comes with upgrades, for VR and games alike, sounds like the way to go. PS4 games will continue to be made, so you don't even need to upgrade to the slim if you so choose, while the mass market will be getting a more capable VR machine that plays most of what gaming has to offer.
 
That's the out.

Anyway, there is no point, as Cosmic said pre-edit. If he's wrong, so what?

Sure.

But I'm trying to figure out what was said that's being ignored (because I'm just really curious, not trying to argue any point).

Here are some of the big points:

-you don't have to fork over more money!
-your existing ps4 will still be the base for ps4 games!
-this is not a new gen, they have 30m+ userbase on existing ps4 consoles!
-there are only some issues if you're jealous! :p

Why are you 1080Ptv mad about this, you think your existing ps4 wont work anymore ?

You think sony will forget you ?

existing ps4 is and will stay the primary console for the coming expected years, all what this new ps4 system will do is run ps4 games in 4k, graphical assets will be the same across both systems. Will there be some enhancements here and there sure, but that's the point of having a 4k set

Just see nothing here that is being ignored at all, or anything that contradicts the latest rumors. What did I miss?

Or is it the term "run" in the final post that is what you're referring to? Since it's not specified precisely how it would be run... a bit difficult to assume it would be native, as it's "running" PS4 games, which are not built for native 4k?
 
Top Bottom