boredandlazy
Member
And on the Eighth day, God created bodybuilders.
So that's one per week?
And on the Eighth day, God created bodybuilders.
Is there an equilibrium score where everyone gets served crow, or nobody gets served crow?
Uh sorry to break it to you, but that was gameplay. Even if you don't want to think it is or don't deem it the kind you're into.
I like how the Order and No Man Sky threads, while being radically different games, boil down to the same statement above.If it's not gameplay that interests you, it's not gameplay. Nyer.
So that's one per week?
I like how the Order and No Man Sky threads, while being radically different games, boil down to the same statement above.
Is there an equilibrium score where everyone gets served crow, or nobody gets served crow?
The flow of gameplay is a pretty good reason to leave detailed and slow animations to in-game cutscenes. We have lots of footage that show the reloading animations are different while the player is in control and fighting against that clear tutorial style gun range scene. Clear as a day.
It's just not a very exciting 'gameplay' clip, that's all. If it had been titled "11 minutes of the intro to Order 1886" folk might not have been so unhappy.
Even then, if people dislike what they see they can still vent about it, that's only fair.
The only GIFs ive seen appear to be sped up and the gun is almost entirely obstructed by the player character whilst reloading. We have no way of know what the gun animation looks like while reloading in those scenarios because its not really visible. Regardless my only point was that it is certainly possible that the reload animation could be used throughout since we know its a realtime render. I obviously have no way of knowing whether or not it is till I play the game but I certainly hope so because it looks incredible.
Venting about disliking gameplay is fine the problem is the vast majority of the posts I quoted aren't doing that. They are shitting up the thread with pointless meaningless comments with the goal of diminishing other's excitement or anticipation of the title. If people want to have an actual discussion about why they don't like what they saw that's fine but coming into a thread dropping posts that are at best pointless and at worst completely false, in my humble opinion, should not be acceptable behavior.
The only GIFs ive seen appear to be sped up and the gun is almost entirely obstructed by the player character whilst reloading. We have no way of know what the gun animation looks like while reloading in those scenarios because its not really visible. Regardless my only point was that it is certainly possible that the reload animation could be used throughout since we know its a realtime render. I obviously have no way of knowing whether or not it is till I play the game but I certainly hope so because it looks incredible.
Venting about disliking gameplay is fine the problem is the vast majority of the posts I quoted aren't doing that. They are shitting up the thread with pointless meaningless comments with the goal of diminishing other's excitement or anticipation of the title. If people want to have an actual discussion about why they don't like what they saw that's fine but coming into a thread dropping posts that are at best pointless and at worst completely false, in my humble opinion, should not be acceptable behavior.
Venting about disliking gameplay is fine the problem is the vast majority of the posts I quoted aren't doing that. They are shitting up the thread with pointless meaningless comments with the goal of diminishing other's excitement or anticipation of the title. If people want to have an actual discussion about why they don't like what they saw that's fine but coming into a thread dropping posts that are at best pointless and at worst completely false, in my humble opinion, should not be acceptable behavior.
The review thread is going to be such a glorious trainwreckIf this game scores low on metacritic gonna need to hire a catering service to serve all the crow.
We're fucked either way.
The review thread is going to be such a glorious trainwreck
Meltdowns erywhere
You talk like it's some grand conspiracy. The more likely situation is just that the developers haven't shown anything to make a large group of people want the game.
If this game scores low on metacritic gonna need to hire a catering service to serve all the crow.
We're fucked either way.
But isn't everyone expecting a low score? Crow would only be served if it scored in the 90s.
You know what this looks like? When you encounter MISSINGNO in pokemon.
Meh, you're giving them basically exactly what they want. They're not hopeful to see "gameplay" of The Order. Just ignore them and let us deal with it. It's like when the awkward "jokester" in high school walks into the classroom and makes a stupid joke like, "Hey, look everyone, I have class! I'm classy! HAWWW" and then there's silence. They're just waiting for your echo to know they got what they wanted.
Party pooper 😞Not to pick on you, but I would encourage people to stop saying or anticipating this outcome. Agitators (on any side) are getting banned.
What? Define a low score.
What? Define a low score.
70s. Low relative to other big budget AAA games.
70s. Low relative to other big budget AAA games.
So 70s: worst game ever. 80s: average, lol all that money spent. 90s: it's "good". Is that it now?But isn't everyone expecting a low score? Crow would only be served if it scored in the 90s.
70s. Low relative to other big budget AAA games.
Be able to have a good look when the Photomode is released.![]()
If it gets above a 75 on meteoritic there'll be crow, I'm expecting/hoping it will average at an 85
Expecting high 60s, low 70s.
LOL and now I cannot unsee it.
That's great that you all will deal with it but in the mean time people trying to actually have discussions in these threads have to wade through all the bullshit to do so. It's never really bothered me that much before but with it happening on such a pronounced scale in every thread about certain games that I'm incredibly excited for (The Order, No Man's Sky) it's passed the realm of mild inconvenience to frustrating and annoying. Maybe it's just because I frequent the threads of these particular games so often but it just seems tome its become a major issue for those of us actually seeking to talk about the games in question.
TLDR: I honestly just wish it wasn"t an issue and I could share my anticipation and excitement for these games with other gaffers in peace.
You can share your excitement and other people can share their negativity. That's how a message board should work. But if you feel someone is not legitimately engaging in the topic, ignore them and report them and we'll deal with them. They only derail a thread when people let them do so.
So 70s: worst game ever. 80s: average, lol all that money spent. 90s: it's "good". Is that it now?
jesus this looks so good but yes i couldnt stand watching that video
The post that I quoted initially (yours), said people are expecting low scores, and that crow would only be served if the game scored in the 90s. Here you're saying people expect more than "good" from flagship games and then go on to categorize 80s as "great" and 70s as "good", yet you only think "crow would be served" if the game scores more than 80s. So what is it?Very strange assumption.
0 = worst game ever
70 = good
80 = great
90 = amazing
100=best game ever
People expect more than "good" from a flagship game, especially when there are plenty of great and amazing games to play instead.
Wow. I'm expect between 70-80 but 60-70 seems really pessimistic.Expecting high 60s, low 70s.
jesus this looks so good but yes i couldnt stand watching that video
Nearly fell asleep trying to fast forward through that clip.
So pretty and boring at the same time.
Not even close.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751
Post #6 is where the insanity starts.