Revolutionary
Member
Finally, a good episode. I just might see this through if it continues like this.
I thought it was kind of an odd choice to withhold for a while that Nora and Rev. Matt were brother and sister - like it was supposed to be some sort of moderately surprising revelation.
Yeah that's my one issue with this show so far. It's holding back on relationships between characters for what appears to be simply adding to the feeling of mystery. Like with the deal with Kevin's Dad for example. There were a few more things that stuck out that I forget now... maybe I'll remember later, but it definitely seems to be a trend.
My wife and I watched the 2nd episode today and decided to bail. It's not that it's bad, it's just that we decided there's way too much other stuff we're watching. And that other stuff doesn't require a lot of "is this just weird on purpose or is there a purpose to it being weird?"
So, I'm out.
Yeah he was pretty great.Is anyone else as thoroughly impressed Eccleston carried that entire episode by himself? I honestly couldn't have expected that. It felt like a character-centric episode of LOST from the earlier seasons like Walkabout (Locke; season 1) or The Long Con (Sawyer; season 2).
Pretty good episode, but i still don't get what the point of this show is.
Pretty good episode, but i still don't get what the point of this show is.
Wow, this priest is a dick.
"Brother, I love you..."
"Your husband was cheating on you. Long-term. With a waitress. I think he loved her...oh wait, love you too. And please think about lending me that $135,000."
His motivations just don't make sense. He's on some mission to prove that the Event wasn't the rapture and not everyone who was taken was good...but nobody seems to be deluded about that, so instead he's just coming off as a huge asshole.
What you don't like regular shows?Feels like the "rapture" is an excuse to show a drama.
Without it, it feels like a regular show
Like a soap operaWhat you don't like regular shows?
I'm not in love with it yet and I feel like despite Lindelof saying the mystery won't be Lost-like, I'll get fucked over by it at the end. But I'm intrigued and where others see boring I see a distinct tone and speed that is different from most but still good.
Uhh the guilty remnant?
The Christian commentators on TV I'd guess too
Also even if the majority of his community aren't like ermahgerd rapture, with the overwhelming confusion about the event and the hurt that causes, emphasising it wasn't the rapture still makes sense.
Which is why I'm not sure what people are seeing in the latest episode...I don't think the GR do what they do because they think that everyone taken was good. I think they do it just to serve as a "reminder" that the Event happened. Although, if you ask me their motivations don't seem to make sense for the same reason the priest's doesn't -- namely, they all seem to be fighting an invisible enemy. The priest seems to be fighting a a war against people thinking the Event was the rapture and the people who were taken were good people...buuuut nobody seems to think that they were (we've had several characters comment on how they knew someone who was taken was a giant asshole, going back to the first episode). Likewise, the GR's mission seems to be to serve as a reminder that the Event happened...buuuut nobody seems to be trying to forget that it did. Everyone is bogged down in the depression of it, even people who weren't close to anyone that was actually taken.
Hardly any of the characters' motivations align with the world as it has been presented to us, actually, which just contributes to how random this all feels. It's a huge problem with the show, in my opinion. I'm surprised so many of these glowing reviews don't comment on it.
I hope the show does these single character-focused episodes on a regular basis.
I think it's a far more compelling format than the more traditional setup used in the first two eps.
Huh, Eccleston is returning to Heroes?
Interest just went up.
I hope they were serious when they said that it should wrap up after the 10 episodes, I like when shows do that.
If the show connects and people want more of it, there are more stories to tell in this world, but if it doesnt, and these 10 episodes are the only 10 episodes of The Leftovers that will ever exist, I hope it will be more like The Prisoner than other series that were canceled after one season.
Which is why I'm not sure what people are seeing in the latest episode...
Why is that guy doing the things he does? He has to keep telling (reminding, really) people that some of those who disappeared had skeletons in their closet because... his suffering would be meaningless otherwise? Whah?
Does that make more sense than all those kids burning themselves or dropping out of college because "what's the point anymore?" Or those assholes in white trolling everybody because "don't waste your breath"?
Am I supposed to understand that this is the first time Eccleston's character has to consider the idea that sometimes shit just happens? That you don't necessarily "deserve" what happens to you?
That, before, he had faith it all made sense (somehow, I don't pretend to understand how believers make sense out of all the tragedies around them), but now that the world has experienced what could certainly be called an actual supernatural event, a phenomenon clearly caused by something intelligent, interested in humans and not too concerned about the laws of physics as we know them, now, he's losing that faith? "Millions of innocents dying or suffering in natural disasters or freak accidents prior to that? Well, God probably had His reasons. But that sudden disappearance thing? Man, now, that's fucked up. Nothing makes sense anymore!"
Would things have been different for him had his car crash been caused by... well, a slippery road? Is there any point in telling that story here?
Is there any way for me to empathize with that character's behavior?
Is there any reason for me to be interested in that protracted "will he or won't he get/keep that money?" sequence which merely seems to be the writer fucking with him just for shits and giggles?
So many questions!
And they also told him to bet on red. Rather than green or yellow. Thanks, birds. Thirds.the pigeons made him do it
Is anyone else as thoroughly impressed Eccleston carried that entire episode by himself? I honestly couldn't have expected that. It felt like a character-centric episode of LOST from the earlier seasons like Walkabout (Locke; season 1) or The Long Con (Sawyer; season 2).
if you look closely at the casino security dude's ring you will see the dharma initiative symbol
also when the casino teller is processing all the bills the bill sorter passes by the numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and even 42
Well I'm in after 3 eps. I hope they were serious when they said that it should wrap up after the 10 episodes, I like when shows do that.
I don't think anyone involved with this show has said this ever.
Likewise, the GR's mission seems to be to serve as a reminder that the Event happened...buuuut nobody seems to be trying to forget that it did.
I thought it was about people reacting to a situation that doesn't make any sense. At least that's what I am getting from it so far. It's about how their lives were shattered and how they are coping with something unimaginable. The "why" it happened isn't really the focus.
I didn't see anything, went frame by frame. Not sure what you mean.if you look closely at the casino security dude's ring you will see the dharma initiative symbol
also when the casino teller is processing all the bills the bill sorter passes by the numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and even 42
This is my only complaint about the show..it seems to want to make me smoke after years of not smoking. CHEW GUM DAMN IT!Holy shit was that intense. I seriously wanted a cigarette after watching and I haven't had one in years. Great fucking episode. Always been a fan of Eccleson and was cool that it pretty much revolved around him.
And they also told him to bet on red. Rather than green or yellow. Thanks, birds. Thirds.
(Although one could argue those traffic lights were mostly black, really, but hey!)
I can't imagine it doesn't come back for a second season. It's drawing okay numbers and of the four dramas HBO is airing now/this fall, three of them are final seasons (true blood, boardwalk, and newsroom).Is there any reason to believe this wouldn't be picked up by HBO for a second season?
The ratings haven't been amazing so far, but they're decent. Definitely not Enlightened-level bad and I doubt they ever will be.
Plus, I can't imagine it's very expensive to produce - certainly nowhere near the cost of stuff like Game of Thrones, True Blood and Boardwalk Empire.
Ha!Treme then, only much worse.
At least a reviewer should try to look it up. But at least she got the grade right... I guess?! Eh...Wow...it's kinda crazy how much the writer got wrong in this review. Not understanding the title, not knowing why he put the bet on red, misunderstanding the sex scene, etc.
I can't imagine it doesn't come back for a second season. It's drawing okay numbers and of the four dramas HBO is airing now/this fall, three of them are final seasons (true blood, boardwalk, and newsroom).
They also said at the TCAs the other day they were currently in talks for S2, so unless something weird happens it's probably just a matter of time before we hear of a renewal.
I liked the pilot, thought episode two was good - episode 3 hit a homerun though. Totally on board now. Ecclestone's one man-show was fascinating to watch, he did quite well. More than one time I was reminded of LOST's Walkabout and that is never a bad thing.