• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Verge: Microsoft 'has been testing a variety of prototype Xbox devices'

Theorry

Member
Maybe in the future. But this one is still gonna be called Xbox One (something)
Will otherwise be way to confusing.
 

MUnited83

For you.
didn't they recently say they have no interest in a .5 system mid gen?
Not in the slightest. All he said was PR bull on how they wanted to market such a thing as a significant difference.They will be doing the same as Sony and they will release a new iteration of the Xbox One.
 

Shpeshal Nick

aka Collingwood
I think I mentioned this in the other thread but I think voice control will be built in somehow.

They've abandoned Kinect but Cortana will still be pushed.

On the name, my bet is on one of:

Xbox One S (remember there was a 360 S and E)
Xbox
Xbox 4K
 

Bsigg12

Member
True enough. I have to admit, it is pretty sweet but at that price, i just cant afford it for what id do with it.

The Surface is product designed to be held every day. It's case is crazy expensive so the next Xbox will benefit from not needing an ultra premium feeling metal surrounding it. It should however look phenomenal.
 

Sydle

Member
Phil could have been overruled

But what he said is not in conflict.

He said new hardware capabilities during a generation and later added, after a lot of speculation from the internet, that he's not a fan of the idea of Xbox 1.5, that it would be a more substantial change, that he wants to move forward in big numbers.

Go read the actual quotes instead of the journo headlines.
 

Theorry

Member
Maybe a crazy thought. Would MS just take a loss and really make sure to beat the Neo spec wise and keep the same price as the Neo. I know MS has alot of money and just take that loss in the beginning?
 
Time to send out those Xbox computers

3.jpg
 

Kyrios

Member
Maybe a crazy thought. Would MS just take a loss and really make sure to beat the Neo spec wise and keep the same price as the Neo. I know MS has alot of money and just take that loss in the beginning?

Honestly, they really don't have much to lose at this point. Especially if sales of the Neo really take off.
 
Didn't Phil Spencer say he doesn't like the idea of an Xbox 1.5?

then again he seems to say whatever people want to hear at the time

yes, he said that right after he hinted at an xbox 1.5

it was pretty clear he was trying to say their new hardware would be better than a "half step".
 

Synth

Member
Perhaps it may be better on Xbox but looking at PC I would say whole heatedly no. UWP is a disaster on PC in its current form.

Have you actually been paying attention to it on PC (beyond simply "it sucks!")? Which of UWPs current issues on PC would be applicable to a more powerful console?
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
yes, he said that right after he hinted at an xbox 1.5

it was pretty clear he was trying to say their new hardware would be better than a "half step".

I also think he was taking the '1.5' thing too literal (on purpose to sway PR, and as someone mentioned, say what people want to hear at the time)... he is not obtuse, he knows when we say '1.5' we don't mean another 50% in power (to equal PS4 now ;p), but we mean a power boost mid gen for the same ecosystem, to give tech more time to mature for a true next gen.

But he had a PR field day, in which I could only roll my eyes. He knows what we meant. Come on Phil, lol.
 
twice the esram
new ddr4 (samsung 10nm)
dont know maybe solutions as sony for the cpu and gpu, would it be possible to fit since the esram takes a lot of space even on new 14/16nm ?
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
If it's a significant upgrade I might get one.

Go on MS. Bring out a scorcher.
 

Proelite

Member
Brainedstormed some nexbox devices:

Xbox TV:
2 core Puma / Zen at 1.8 ghz.
2 cu cpu, 128:16:8 GPU at 600 mhz.
4GB of LDDR4 on 64 bit bus. 32 gb/s.
Comes with gesture enabled remote with in built microphone.
Kinect sold separately. Controller sold separately. Works with any KB&M.
$199

Xbox Slim:
8 core Puma / Zen at 2.1 ghz
12 CU Polaris gpu, 768:48:16 GPU at 1050 mhz. 1.6 teraflops.
32mb esram.
12GB of LPDDR4 on 128 bit bus. 68 gb/s.
Comes with controller.
OS runs smoother.
Old xbox one games run in BC mode. New Xbox one games run in UWP mode, with ability to use up to 8GB of ram, the increased cpu and gpu power.
$299.

Xbox Two:
8 core Zen at 2.1 ghz
24 CU gpu, 1536:96:32 at 1050 mhz. 3.2 teraflops.
32mb of Esram.
16GB of DDR4 on 256 bit bus. 100 gb/s
$399

Xbox Three:
8 core Zen at 2.1 ghz
32 CU gpu at 1050 mhz. 4.8 teraflops
Some amounts of HBM2 on the APU.
16GB of DDR4 on 256 bit bus. 100 gb/s
$499

Xbox Four (in a few years time):
16 core CPU at 2.4 ghz
64 CU gpu at 1.2 ghz. ~10 teraflops
64GB of HBM2.
$399
 

Yoday

Member
Maybe a crazy thought. Would MS just take a loss and really make sure to beat the Neo spec wise and keep the same price as the Neo. I know MS has alot of money and just take that loss in the beginning?
It's not a crazy thought. I think they are going to take a bigger hit on hardware than they initially did with XBO. Just look at how fast they started dropping the price of XBO. Since the start of this gen digital sales have skyrocketed and continue to grow, this means that each user is worth a lot more now than in the past. On top of that with the melding of their Windows 10 ecosystem they have even more reason to get as many users as possible. Every Xbox user is going to grow that Windows Store ecosystem.
 

Proelite

Member
It's not a crazy thought. I think they are going to take a bigger hit on hardware than they initially did with XBO. Just look at how fast they started dropping the price of XBO. Since the start of this gen digital sales have skyrocketed and continue to grow, this means that each user is worth a lot more now than in the past. On top of that with the melding of their Windows 10 ecosystem they have even more reason to get as many users as possible. Every Xbox user is going to grow that Windows Store ecosystem.

If they introduce several configurations like the ones I listed before, they might want to take a hit only on the most popular and mainstream configuration, while make profits on the less popular ones.
 

El_Chino

Member
Brainedstormed some nexbox devices:

Xbox TV:
2 core Puma / Zen at 1.8 ghz.
2 cu cpu, 128:16:8 GPU at 600 mhz.
4GB of LDDR4 on 64 bit bus. 32 gb/s.
Comes with gesture enabled remote with in built microphone.
Kinect sold separately. Controller sold separately. Works with any KB&M.
$199

Xbox Slim:
8 core Puma / Zen at 2.1 ghz
12 CU Polaris gpu, 768:48:16 GPU at 1050 mhz. 1.6 teraflops.
32mb esram.
12GB of LPDDR4 on 128 bit bus. 68 gb/s.
Comes with controller.
OS runs smoother.
Old xbox one games run in BC mode. New Xbox one games run in UWP mode, with ability to use up to 8GB of ram, the increased cpu and gpu power.
$299.

Xbox Two:
8 core Zen at 2.1 ghz
24 CU gpu, 1536:96:32 at 1050 mhz. 3.2 teraflops.
32mb of Esram.
16GB of DDR4 on 256 bit bus. 100 gb/s
$399

Xbox Three:
8 core Zen at 2.1 ghz
32 CU gpu at 1050 mhz. 4.8 teraflops
Some amounts of HBM2 on the APU.
16GB of DDR4 on 256 bit bus. 100 gb/s
$499

Xbox Four (in a few years time):
16 core CPU at 2.4 ghz
64 CU gpu at 1.2 ghz. ~10 teraflops
64GB of HBM2.
$399
Didn't you say Zen would make it more expensive? I think Microsoft would at least match the 4tf.
 

Yoday

Member
If they introduce several configurations like the ones I listed before, they might want to take a hit only on the most popular and mainstream configuration, while make profits on the less popular ones.
I could very well see that too. Part of me thinks the $500 Elite bundle was testing the waters for a configuration that they could sell at $500. A $500 box without kinect that is close to breaking even on BOM would actually be pretty damn solid. Then they could sell a slim XBO at $250 this holiday.

I'm torn n on if they would reconfigure the XBO APU for a slim. Using 14nm they could easily OC what is already there and even add a few CUs to the GPU while still greatly shrinking the die. This would allow them to cut costs and match or exceed the standard PS4 in power at a mainstream price. The problem then becomes asking developers to support three different configurations at the same time since OG XBO would still need to be supported. I suppose it all hinges on how easy UWP makes all of this cross device development.
 

Proelite

Member
I could very well see that too. Part of me thinks the $500 Elite bundle was testing the waters for a configuration that they could sell at $500. A $500 box without kinect that is close to breaking even on BOM would actually be pretty damn solid. Then they could sell a slim XBO at $250 this holiday.

I'm torn n on if they would reconfigure the XBO APU for a slim. Using 14nm they could easily OC what is already there and even add a few CUs to the GPU while still greatly shrinking the die. This would allow them to cut costs and match or exceed the standard PS4 in power at a mainstream price. The problem then becomes asking developers to support three different configurations at the same time since OG XBO would still need to be supported. I suppose it all hinges on how easy UWP makes all of this cross device development.

Imo it'll be two configuration.

1 configuration would be Xbox 1 mode.
2nd configuration would be UWP. Less to the metal so less efficient, but the binaries can target a variety of hardware, including the new Xboxes and W10 PCs.

All the Xbox devices that I listed, the slim, the two, three, etc will be run legacy Xb1 games in the Xb1 VM on the hypervisor.

For newer Xb1 games, they'll ship with capability to run on two VMs, legacy and UWP vm.
Legacy will be fixed and to the metal, while UWP will be scaleable, essentially the PC version.

The problem will be the esram for new Xb1 games. They'll need to update the DX12 api for W10 to be able to make use of esram.
 

Yoday

Member
Imo it'll be two configuration.

1 configuration would be Xbox 1 mode.
2nd configuration would be UWP. Less to the metal so less efficient, but the binaries can target a variety of hardware, including the new Xboxes and W10 PCs.

All the Xbow devices that I listed, the slim, the two, three, etc will be run legacy Xb1 games in the Xb1 VM on the hypervisor.

For newer Xb1 games, they'll ship with capability to run on two VMs, legacy and UWP vm.
Legacy will be fixed and to the metal, while UWP will be scaleable, essentially the PC version.
That is more or less how I see it happening as well, I guess I just want to learn more about the full capabilities of UWP. Developers at the very least would have to include settings profiles for each hardware configuration, and I fear that too many configurations would lead to all of the profiles being slapped together. I also feel like more than two configurations at any given time would just create confusion on the market.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
I think I mentioned this in the other thread but I think voice control will be built in somehow.

They've abandoned Kinect but Cortana will still be pushed.

On the name, my bet is on one of:

Xbox One S (remember there was a 360 S and E)
Xbox
Xbox 4K

I'd almost buy another one I f they had a mic built into the console for cortana and 'Xbox pause'. They could also build in the Kinect IR blaster into the console front panel. Finally let me ditch my Kinect
 

Proelite

Member
That is more or less how I see it happening as well, I guess I just want to learn more about the full capabilities of UWP. Developers at the very least would have to include settings profiles for each hardware configuration, and I fear that too many configurations would lead to all of the profiles being slapped together. I also feel like more than two configurations at any given time would just create confusion on the market.

They'll program at a high level and make the game's performance scaleable across a myriad of specs like current PC games are. They will not be able to compete against the Neo on a power / watt or dollar level on year 1 due to using high level apis, but going forward it allows them to iterate new hardware and configurations at a much faster rate.
 
Top Bottom