Filthy Casual
Member
Based EA based Dice
Dis gon b gud!
Dis gon b gud!
I guess so, it wouldn't be a big deal if they included other races in combat roles -just saying it can be risky doing so by misrepresenting what was really going on.If racism isn't the point of the piece (which it obviously wouldn't be for BF5) I think portraying racism accurately probably does more harm than ignoring racism and being inclusive as a result. I don't really see what a blockbuster shooter has to gain by accurately including racism.
Perhaps it's not the setting that's boring but the conflicts in the games? Most just recycled the same battles and frontsI never sad that it is not fresh. But this world War 1 / world War 2 setting is so fucking boring to me. I played all the MOHs, CODs, Band of brothers, and what not. I really liked bf3 with its setting in the "now" or very near future. Black ops 2 was already too futuristic for me though.
Found my glasses. Definitely looks like a black man to me.
What is the explanation that they give about why WWII started?
It's alt history, that's exactly what they are going to doSeriously hoping this isn't WWI.
Or at least if it is, it has a hodge-podge of newer tech like CoD:BO did with the Cold War stuff.
What is the explanation that they give about why WWII started?
I wonder how much trench warfare this game will actually have. Bi-planes will be cool tho.
There a better or alternative pic? That pic makes it appear a bit more cutting edge for WW1 than actual WW1. Maybe it's that lighting.
Is this a serious question? Shaved heads on a soldier are like a standard. Pretty much every war movie ever has the mandatory scene of the soldiers all sitting in a line getting their heads shaved.
And there really is no "look" of a shaved head. A shaved head is a shaved head is a shaved head.
Freaking AThat dude looks majestic as fuck.
Im pretty sure he is a white guy.
There a better or alternative pic? That pic makes it appear a bit more cutting edge for WW1 than actual WW1. Maybe it's that lighting.
If you wanted to be one of the cool kids yeah. You wanna be cool don't ya?
please have a good campaign
Was this really called for?
The best part of these threads are and will continue to be the "Wtf, don't you people know anything about WW1?" posts.
Little hint: Nah they probably don't. WW1 gets no respect in typical US education. It's basically "Things were messed up, trenches and gas for 4 years, BUT YO LEMME TELL YOU BOUT HITLER THOUGH."
Bf2142 had something like weapons attachments Lite.Weapon attachments and vehicle unlocks were not in BF2, 2142, BF2MC, BC1, or 1943.
Sautéed, fried,grilled,Or baked chose wisely lol.I'll eat my crow now.
Looks like the white dude from the teaser.Anyone discussed the race of the fellow on the pic? Gotta be alternate timeline right? In WWI most african-american troops were put on labor battalions.
(can't find my glasses, eyesight is shit, so I'm sorry if I'm mistaken about his race)
Here is a proper capture I just did
ALSO
May 6th. 1937. the hindenburg zeppline crashed as well.
Today is May 6th
WW1 is barely, if at all, covered in American schools from my experience so not surprised at people being confused about it.
I don't get the negatively. I'm very highly intrigued by a WW1 setting.
God they are going with the blue and orange yet again !
Not even the same people.Looks like the white dude from the teaser.
But there is nothing in that keyart that would suggest it isn't WW1. So I don't know what you are trying to say.
Also, have no clue what RA2 is.
Literal walls of explosions and hailstorms of gunfire was like the bread and butter of the WWI front. If anything this is the game that will have the most explosions yetInterested in the game, BF3 & 4 remains some of my favourite multiplayer games but a WW1 setting seems kind of in poor taste. It wouldn't necessarily work as a FPS unless you jazz it up, but then you're glorifying one of the worst wars ever seen. Not saying you can't have games in that setting but give it the credence it deserves (Valiant Hearts does fantastically well in this regard). I only hope EA/DICE does do that rather than give it the AAA big budget guns and explosions treatment seen in past single player Battlefield campaigns.
The best part of these threads are and will continue to be the "Wtf, don't you people know anything about WW1?" posts.
Little hint: Nah they probably don't. WW1 gets no respect in typical US education. It's basically "Things were messed up, trenches and gas for 4 years, BUT YO LEMME TELL YOU BOUT HITLER THOUGH."
I wouldn't mind modern day if someone would bother to try to tackle it in a serious manner. We've got like Spec Ops. And that's it.Holy shit this is beautiful. It could end up being a burning trashpile but at this point I'm on board for literally any setting that's not near future or modern day.
not to go into racism or nothing like but the dude is black. the western front did not use much colonial troops on that theater, I think. If this game plays like the recent Verdun most people will hate it.
and since this probably is usa saving the world, it just don't make any logic.
I need to go read a history book, were helicopters around back then? Wondering how limited this game is going to be.
$10 says there will be a level in the campaign called "All Quiet On the Western Front".