Silly article, Leadbetter is upset when the PRO performs worse than OG PS4. Yet, this article says that PRO offering better framerates puts OG PS4 owners at a disadvantage???....Such a divide in thought patterns across the Eurogamer board.....
So what's the point of upgrading then, it's a mid gen refresh that keeps the OG PS4 in the same loop, of course Pro users would get better framerates, it's better hardware, it's the reason anyone bought the darn thing in the first place. News at 6..., they got better visuals too, better loadtimes, snappier menus, better fidelity in games, better resolution, these can all be considered advantages and was always anticipated from the get-go.
The only thing Sony could do, they did. Don't offer a 30fps mp game on PS4 and a 60fps mp version on Pro, the target must be the same. The onus is on developers to lower the settings on PS4 enough to maintain the 60fps as close as possible, even in that scenario, people would still complain that the PRO's framerate in only on par with the PS4. However you spin it, Eurogamer's stance here is silly.....
What are they asking for? That the Pro gimp framerate to match the PS4 in every scenario? This is hilarious...