dreamlongdead
Member
Yikes! It was just a few weeks away from releasing.
I don't really know what to expect from the product at this stage.
I don't really know what to expect from the product at this stage.
Holy shit, Inafune. I made the awful decision to back this game and it ruined Kickstarters for me.
The game has always looked terrible. Just release it or cancel it at this point.
All those people delaying their games shoud honestly stop making games, their incompetence is appaling.
I mean, delaying a game?And more than once? I don't know a single respected developer who has ever done this.
I'm not pretending anything, just responding as to why MS has invested in his next game. Sony has also invested in another Armature title. The delay doesn't bother me, I've got plenty to be playing in the meantime and I look forward to this releasing as a more polished product down the line.
Holy shit, poor guy, hope it happened before this all started falling apart so he could actually enjoy the memories.I wonder how the backer that had the dinner date with Inafune feels about the game.
Inafune had to keep rescheduling.I wonder how the backer that had the dinner date with Inafune feels about the game.
No, in theory it should release around May.At first I was thinking "spring 2006" as in southern hemisphere, but I'm assuming it's more like September onwards? I backed enough to receive a t-shirt and play the beta, so I think I'll cut my loss on the full game there. As Meatloaf said "Two outta three ain't bad" hah.
All those people delaying their games shoud honestly stop making games, their incompetence is appaling.
I mean, delaying a game?And more than once? I don't know a single respected developer who has ever done this.
As a lot of people have pointed out in this thread none of those games were kickstarted or have any controversy surrounding their development.
I don't see why it's relevant that it was kickstarted. The development process is the same. The only difference is that people actually get a transparent view into game development and don't at all understand that delays are normal and expected in game development. Milestones are missed. Unforseen problems arise.
I know, I just said they are probably not as experienced/don't have as many games under their belt as Inti Creates. I can only find 4 games they have worked on and although they have said that they have worked on many big games but are uncredited for them, that doesn't tell me much about them.Hyde is not a new developer...
UE3
They're having trouble with fucking UE3
I don't see why it's relevant that it was kickstarted. The development process is the same. The only difference is that people actually get a transparent view into game development and don't at all understand that delays are normal and expected in game development. Milestones are missed. Unforseen problems arise.
I understand why people are unhappy with the game in general. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm only talking about the outcry that happens pretty much every time a crowdfunded game gets delayed.
This was a mistake.
I backed for $250
This is why it's not wise for any Kickstarter project to add stretch goals which expands the scope of a game significantly. Even adding more people doesn't magically make development not take longer.
I don't see why it's relevant that it was kickstarted. The development process is the same. The only difference is that people actually get a transparent view into game development and don't at all understand that delays are normal and expected in game development. Milestones are missed. Unforseen problems arise.
I understand why people are unhappy with the game in general. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm only talking about the outcry that happens pretty much every time a crowdfunded game gets delayed.
Well, in this case it's doubly silly given that their excuse for delaying the game twice now is due to stretch goals which don't matter to the core game at all right? If they lack the resources to complete them by launch, I don't think anyone would fault them for releasing it later in a patch. It's really odd that they would continue to push the game back just for that, especially when they have a publisher and retail release behind the game too.
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?
This is why it's not wise for any Kickstarter project to add stretch goals which expands the scope of a game significantly. Even adding more people doesn't magically make development not take longer.
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?
Probably for the best. Looked a bit rough from what I've seen.
Maybe they think delaying it will make it good eventually. But they aren't Nintendo.
BS used to cover a more serious problem they don't want to mention. "Sorry but the dog ate my homework!"
Your post deliberately ignores that other issues surrounding the game, by presenting the delays as the only issues, as well as the fact that this is more than just a simple delay anyway. At least two of the delays have had clear deception surrounding them. Inafune as a brand is heavily tarnished at this point, and as a project lead Mighty No. 9 makes him seem riskier than a game that "only" got delayed a couple times would. "Mismanaged" is a very appropriate word for this game, and that would be worrisome to see from any publisher putting in a big investment.
Also, why are you bringing up Armature? They may be developing ReCore, but they have literally nothing to do with Mighty No. 9.
They're not significantly changing it (though impressions have been favorable from what I remember reading). This delay is to fix the online mode and not to significantly change the main game.
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?
So would y'all rather a delay, or for the game to come out broken?