Sword Of Doom
Member
Love the way this game looks. The neon is gorgeous
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
New Infamous Second Son night time shots 9/20
- Thread starter Ricerocket
- Start date
SkullHydra
Member
This game is all kinds of gorgeous. Those devs have seriously upped their game after the first Infamous. I loved the first games a TON, and can't wait to see what Sucker Punch has in store for us. HYPE!
PeregrinSe7en
Member
phenominal stuff!
recklesscognition
Member
The neon looks great, it is going to create a very unique and memorable world. I'm not too concerned with the fine details, even if they aren't improved over then next 5 months, as in real life I don't have zooming capabilities with my eyes. It looks realistic as heck right now.
KoopaTheCasual
Junior Member
I'm pretty sure he shits up every Sony thread he comments in.
He said as good as, not better than everything else, ohhohoho!
HORRORSHØW
Member
That clown's kind of a running joke now isn't he?
TheTrueLegend
Banned
Lol neogaf. Why are you guys so defensive? I love the god of war series but it doesn't make SSM into elite developers. As for Naughty dog, they made 2 master pieces this gen imo. That qualifies as gods, not elites.
I like how everyone attacks one post regarding my opinion but no one answers my question.
Are these screenshots inengine or not? Is the game going to really look this good?
Rodney McKay
Member
I will very likely buy a PS3 for this.
Looks great and as someone who lives in Washington I LOVE the detail of Seattle in this game. I'm really looking forward to seeing just how much of the city is in the game.
Looks great and as someone who lives in Washington I LOVE the detail of Seattle in this game. I'm really looking forward to seeing just how much of the city is in the game.
They seem kinda weird / zoomed in. Something just seems wrong with them, at least to me.
TheTrueLegend
Banned
They look great to me but I just get the feeling they aren't what the game would truly look like. I feel like they are enhanced.
malboroking
Banned
God I love that this game is set in Seattle. So many games are set in NYC or LA, its nice to be able to roam around in an environment that I know like the back of my hand. Love the Denny Way Pink Elephant carwash. I wonder how far you can explore? Will you be able to wreck shit at UW? Can you fight in the clink? Doesnt hurt that the game looks fantastic either.
HORRORSHØW
Member
Curious: Have you seen any other media related to Second Son? Search around GAF, there're threads that show how the game looks in stills/motion.
malboroking
Banned
I used to work in the Columbia Tower and seeing as its the tallest building in Seattle, they better have it in the game =P
Hnnng. This game! The fact that an open-world game looks this good bodes well for the future of next-gen games, imo.
Indeed! It would be nice to see another developer grow to be as capable as SSM and ND. Curious to see which one of them--if any-- (GG with KZ:SF and Sucker Punch with Infamous:SS) would reach those heights.
Sucker Punch looking to join elites like Naughty Dog and SSM with this game
Indeed! It would be nice to see another developer grow to be as capable as SSM and ND. Curious to see which one of them--if any-- (GG with KZ:SF and Sucker Punch with Infamous:SS) would reach those heights.
Aside from the screenshots being bigger than 1080p, it seems pretty normal with some aliasing here and there. Some of the textures looked not quite all there though, like 2d grass, or leaves on the ground. Not that it says anything about the resolution, but for a moment I had the impression that the game (for the purpose of the screenshots) was not quite 1080p. Surely quality was lost somewhere though.
These screenshots being bigger than 1080p, it's pretty safe to assume that this isn't what the game will actually look like then.
The game won't be rendered at that resolution, but these screenshots are, so the spec for the shots certainly isn't related to the PS4 hardware specs.
So just hey, grain of salt.
The game won't be rendered at that resolution, but these screenshots are, so the spec for the shots certainly isn't related to the PS4 hardware specs.
So just hey, grain of salt.
TheTrueLegend
Banned
Grimløck;82953197 said:
Yeah I did, but I saw the e3 demo so I though that was a long time ago and the graphics improved. The game looks really good in motion and the particle affects are amazing but these screenshots look a lot better than the game itself.
TheTrueLegend
Banned
lol
DemonCleaner
Member
pls fix those trees SP!!
Fushichou187
Member
I'm gonna climb all over that first building and suck up every last bit of neon. Can't wait!
Pound_lb003
Member
I have just got to say, aside from resolution (in addition to other IQ differences) and probably shadows, after seeing GTA5, this doesn't looks fantastically impressive.
I was so hyped for this game just before GTA5, but now, I just want to play GTA5.
I was so hyped for this game just before GTA5, but now, I just want to play GTA5.
Rizsparky
Member
This is exactly what I was thinking, cant wait to see what GTA PC/Next Gen looks like.
Not sure how, as impressive as gta is this is a step above it in terms of looks.
TheBioLover
Member
Wut, this looks way better than GTA5.
Pound_lb003
Member
What I am saying is these look like they could be bullshots of GTA5.
Which is to entirely ignore that at the resolution they're captured, they're actually bullshots anyway.
I am sure the difference will come when Delsin is climbing and most of those light sources have shadows associated - and there will be more impressive 'specular' effects. But the assets, let's say in this instance the trees, don't actually seem any more detailed than the ones in GTA5.
It's kind of not a technical comment, more an art comment.
Pound_lb003
Member
Also, just from a releasing screenshots standpoint.
Ofcourse the first shot shouldn't have a T-pose character in it, but the FOV is much more aesthetically pleasing.
The other two shots are so crap - just badly taken. Ridiculous FOV, which in gameplay and debug navigation is necessary, but to release screens in that state is beyond me.
Not like the frankly astounding visuals we saw come out of PAX.
Ofcourse the first shot shouldn't have a T-pose character in it, but the FOV is much more aesthetically pleasing.
The other two shots are so crap - just badly taken. Ridiculous FOV, which in gameplay and debug navigation is necessary, but to release screens in that state is beyond me.
Not like the frankly astounding visuals we saw come out of PAX.
The Maverick
Member
Is this your shtick?
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
I love the way you start of by laughing off the remarks as 'defensive' and then go on to ask whether the game will really look this good. I'm assuming you think that all the gameplay trailers we've seen so far are CG renders.
Kazuma Kiryu
Member
It's maplelord. If it's a sony thread, he's in there, derpin' like there's no tomorrow.
Winnie the Pimp
Member
looks amazing, let's hope the actual City will feel more "alive" than in the previous games, as that really was the only thing i could hold against Infamous 1&2.
travisbickle
Member
Has there been confirmation of a real-time day/night transition?
Good. I actually think it's really dumb when developers like Rockstar or Sucker Punch make it absolutely clear which real life city they are modeling after but they just give it a fake name.
Pirzolaman
Banned
Man I bought a new TV (Sony w905) for PS4 and for this game! Looks amazing.
Risk Breaker
Member
Good lord, this looks amazing.
Also, to the people complaining about brick textures... do you guys know about Level of Detail? Those are very far from the camera in that shot.
Also, to the people complaining about brick textures... do you guys know about Level of Detail? Those are very far from the camera in that shot.
BloodMoney
Banned
i can haz?